Study to Assess the Efficacy of Direct Observation and Mental Visualization of Foot Movements to Treat Bilateral Lower Limb Phantom Limb Pain
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20307
- Recruiting
- Walter Reed Army Medical Center
-
Principal Investigator:
- Jack W Tsao, MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Katie E Hughes, BS
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Lindsay K Hussey-Andersen, AB
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female subjects, 18 to 70 years of age, active duty military, beneficiary, or retiree.
- Written informed consent and written authorization for use or release of health and research study information.
- Traumatic bilateral lower limb amputation.
- No prior history of vertebral disk disease/condition, sciatica or radiculopathy.
- Normal neurological examination.
- Minimum of 3 phantom limb pain episodes each week in one phantom leg.
- Degree of pain evaluated by VAS scoring a minimum of 3 cm at time of screening for entry into study.
- Ability to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age less than 18 or greater than 70.
- Unilateral upper or lower limb amputation.
- Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) - permanent or temporary impairments of cognitive, physical, and psychosocial functions with an associated diminished or altered state of consciousness - as indicated by neuropsychological screening which is currently performed routinely on patients by the TBI program at WRAMC and noted in the patient's medical record. Subjects with diagnosis of mild TBI following TBI testing, but with a normal score (>42) on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) (parts 1 or 2) can be included in the study.
- Known uncontrolled systemic disease- known cancer not in remission, known on-going infection, lupus, kidney disease requiring dialysis, any other systemic disease which might affect ability to participate in this study to its conclusion
- Concurrent participation in another investigational drug or device study for phantom limb pain or participation in the 30 days immediately prior to study enrollment.
- Any condition or situation that, in the investigator's opinion, may put the subject at significant risk, confound the study results, or interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study.
- Significant Axis I or II diagnosis determined by a neurologist in the 6 months prior to entry into the study, defined as a condition requiring initiation of medications or hospitalization with continuing medical treatment for the condition.
- Subjects with lack of effort as determined by the neurologist. Subjects will be screened for effort using the TOMM first in order to exclude those with blatant exaggeration or malingering.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Direct observation of a sequence of right foot movements performed by the experimenter while visualizing moving the amputated or phantom right foot.
|
direct observation of another person's foot moving
|
|
Experimental: 2
Direct observation of a sequence of left foot movements performed by the experimenter while visualizing moving the amputated or phantom left foot.
|
direct observation of another person's foot moving
|
|
Experimental: 3
Direct observation of a sequence of left and right foot movements performed by the experimenter while visualizing moving the amputated or phantom left and right feet.
|
direct observation of another person's foot moving
|
|
Experimental: 4
Mental visualization with closed eyes of a sequence movements performed with the right amputated or phantom foot.
|
mentally imagining moving one's phantom foot/feet
|
|
Experimental: 5
Mental visualization with closed eyes of a sequence movements performed with the left amputated or phantom foot.
|
mentally imagining moving one's phantom foot/feet
|
|
Experimental: 6
Mental visualization with closed eyes of a sequence movements performed with the left and right amputated or phantom feet.
|
mentally imagining moving one's phantom foot/feet
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Significant decrease in the level of phantom limb pain at 4 weeks.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Significant decrease in the number and duration of daily phantom limb pain episodes at 4 weeks.
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Apr 22;263(1369):377-86. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0058.
- Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Montoya P, Larbig W, Unertl K, Topfner S, Grodd W, Taub E, Flor H. Effects of regional anesthesia on phantom limb pain are mirrored in changes in cortical reorganization. J Neurosci. 1997 Jul 15;17(14):5503-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-14-05503.1997.
- Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P. Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation. Pain. 1983 Nov;17(3):243-256. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90097-0.
- Cohen LG, Bandinelli S, Findley TW, Hallett M. Motor reorganization after upper limb amputation in man. A study with focal magnetic stimulation. Brain. 1991 Feb;114 ( Pt 1B):615-27. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.1.615.
- Kew JJ, Ridding MC, Rothwell JC, Passingham RE, Leigh PN, Sooriakumaran S, Frackowiak RS, Brooks DJ. Reorganization of cortical blood flow and transcranial magnetic stimulation maps in human subjects after upper limb amputation. J Neurophysiol. 1994 Nov;72(5):2517-24. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.5.2517.
- Lotze M, Flor H, Grodd W, Larbig W, Birbaumer N. Phantom movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain. 2001 Nov;124(Pt 11):2268-77. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.11.2268.
- Elbert T, Flor H, Birbaumer N, Knecht S, Hampson S, Larbig W, Taub E. Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex in adult humans after nervous system injury. Neuroreport. 1994 Dec 20;5(18):2593-7. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199412000-00047.
- Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, Larbig W, Taub E. Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation. Nature. 1995 Jun 8;375(6531):482-4. doi: 10.1038/375482a0.
- Bone M, Critchley P, Buggy DJ. Gabapentin in postamputation phantom limb pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;27(5):481-6. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2002.35169.
- Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994 Feb;56(2):217-226. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3.
- Grusser SM, Winter C, Muhlnickel W, Denke C, Karl A, Villringer K, Flor H. The relationship of perceptual phenomena and cortical reorganization in upper extremity amputees. Neuroscience. 2001;102(2):263-72. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00491-7.
- Franz EA, Ramachandran VS. Bimanual coupling in amputees with phantom limbs. Nat Neurosci. 1998 Oct;1(6):443-4. doi: 10.1038/2161. No abstract available.
- Lotze M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N, Erb M, Huse E, Flor H. Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain? Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jun;2(6):501-2. doi: 10.1038/9145. No abstract available.
- Manchikanti L, Singh V. Managing phantom pain. Pain Physician. 2004 Jul;7(3):365-75.
- Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Stewart M. Perceptual correlates of massive cortical reorganization. Science. 1992 Nov 13;258(5085):1159-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1439826. No abstract available.
- Katz J, Melzack R. Pain 'memories' in phantom limbs: review and clinical observations. Pain. 1990 Dec;43(3):319-336. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90029-D.
- Carlen PL, Wall PD, Nadvorna H, Steinbach T. Phantom limbs and related phenomena in recent traumatic amputations. Neurology. 1978 Mar;28(3):211-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.28.3.211.
- Lotze M, Montoya P, Erb M, Hulsmann E, Flor H, Klose U, Birbaumer N, Grodd W. Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Sep;11(5):491-501. doi: 10.1162/089892999563553.
- Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, Richards CL, Doyon J. Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):1171-80. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00369-0.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DCI P07-71044
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.