Adjuvant Melatonin for Prevention of Lung Cancer Recurrence and Mortality (AMPLCaRe)

July 12, 2021 updated by: The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine

Adjuvant Melatonin for Prevention of Lung Cancer Recurrence and Mortality: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial

There is evidence to support the use of melatonin, a natural health product, as an additional treatment aid for cancer patients. This study is designed to see if the daily ingestion of 20 milligrams of melatonin for one year can lower the incidence of developing lung cancer recurrence and/or death. Only patients with a diagnosis of non small cell lung cancer who are eligible for surgical resection can participate in the trial. The study will also be assessing for changes in quality of life, pain, fatigue, anxiety, sleep, and depression amongst the participants.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The trial employs a two-armed parallel placebo controlled trial design whereby patients with a diagnosis of non small cell lung cancer are randomized to receive either 20 mg of melatonin nightly or an identically matched placebo. All patients will be followed for two years with primary outcomes assessed at a two year time point and secondary outcomes evaluated throughout the course of the trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
709

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Quebec
    • British Columbia
      • Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1Y 4N7
        • Kelowna General Hospital
      • Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, V3R 7P8
        • Fraser Health
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2Y9
        • QEII Health Sciences Centre/Capital Health
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • St. Joseph's/ McMaster University
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C1
        • London Health Sciences Centre
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 1J7
        • Ottawa General Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1Z5
        • University Health Network

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of non small cell lung cancer
  • Eligible for surgical resection
  • Willingness to adhere to randomized treatment
  • Availability for follow-up schedule of visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking exogenous melatonin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Melatonin
To receive 20 mg of melatonin nightly for 1 year post-surgery
Dietary supplement: melatonin
20 mgs ingested nightly
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
To receive 20 mg placebo nightly for 1 year post-surgery
Dietary supplement: placebo
similar to experimental in all ways except for lack of active ingredient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lung Cancer Recurrence or Mortality - 2 Years
Time Frame: 2 years
Disease-Free survival (DFS) at 2 years post-surgery. DFS is measured by the number of participants in both arms who have experienced a recurrence OR mortality at 2 years.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 2 years
Participant-reported quality of life using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ C-30) and Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ LC13) questionnaires. Scores represent a value from 0-100. Symptom and LC13 scale: 0 represents best health, 100 worst health. Global and functional scales: 100 represents best health, 0 represents worst health. Full scoring algorithms available here: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf
2 years
Fatigue
Time Frame: 2 years
Measured using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory 20 (MFI-20) questionnaire. Scores are on a scale of 0-100, where 100 is the best health and 0 is the worst health.
2 years
Sleep
Time Frame: 2 years
Measured using the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Survey. Scales used were Sleep Adequacy and Sleep problems Index II. Scores are on a scale of 0-100. Sleep Adequacy: 100 represents best health; 0 represents worst health. Problems index: 0 represents best health; 100 represents worst health.
2 years
Pain Levels
Time Frame: 3 months
Calculated using the Brief Pain Inventory. Each scale ranges from 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst possible pain.
3 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: 2 years
Measured using the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Scored range from 0-63, where 0 is no anxiety and 63 is the worst possible anxiety.
2 years
Depression
Time Frame: 2 years
Measured using the Beck Depression Inventory II. Scores range from 0-63, where 0 is no depression and 63 is the worst possible depression.
2 years
Adverse Events (Chemotherapy)
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of participants who experienced an adverse event related to their adjuvant chemotherapy
2 years
Lung Cancer Recurrence or Mortality - 5 Years
Time Frame: up to 5 years
Measured as disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years. DFS was measured by the incidence of a recurrence OR mortality up to 5 years post-surgery.
up to 5 years
Blood Tests to Examine the Effects of Melatonin on the Immune System (Raw Values)
Time Frame: 6 months
NK cell cytotoxicity changes from baseline to 6 months
6 months
Adverse Events (Radiation)
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of participants who experienced an adverse event related to their adjuvant radiation therapy
2 years
Blood Tests to Examine the Effects of Melatonin on the Immune System (Comparison Between Groups)
Time Frame: 6 months
Differences in NK cell cytotoxicity between both arms
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The Ottawa Hospital
Gateway for Cancer Research
Lotte & John Hecht Memorial Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dugald MR Seely, ND, MSc, The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew JE Seely, MD, The Ottawa Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 9, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 29, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2007077-01H

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings