Risk of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) in Patients With Moderate Renal Insufficiency After the Administration of Magnevist

September 17, 2014 updated by: Bayer

Prospective Non-randomized Observational (Pharmacoepidemiologic) Cohort Study (Open-label, Multicenter) to Assess the Magnitude of Potential Risk With the Administration of Magnevist® Injection in Patients With Moderate Renal Impairment for the Development of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) Based on Diagnostically Specific Clinical and Histopathologic Information.

Assess potential risk for NSF in subjects with renal impairment (moderate) post magnevist injection. Subjects will be screened within 48 hours of previously scheduled MRI, those meeting the enrollment criteria will be enrolled prior to MRI and followed for 2 years post MRI with visits occuring at 1yr and 2 yr timepoints, in addition follow-up phone calls conducted at 1, 3, 6 and 18 months to assess for skin changes suggestive of NSF.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
168

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85008
    • California
      • Chula Vista, California, United States, 91910
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
      • Santa Rosa, California, United States, 95405
    • Colorado
      • Pueblo, Colorado, United States, 81008
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520--804
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209-6595
    • Hawaii
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96813
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96859
    • Kansas
      • Topeka, Kansas, United States, 66604
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11219
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11790
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
    • Pennsylvania
      • Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822-2001
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19141
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38104
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
    • Washington
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98321

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who are scheduled to undergo CE-MRI with Magnevist and for which the inclusion and exclusion criteria are fulfilled are eligible for enrolment into the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have moderate (eGFR 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m^2) renal impairment and be scheduled for a contrast enhanced MRI with Magnevist Injection at the recommended dose of 0.1 mmol/kg.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gadolinium Based Contrast Agent (other then Magnevist) enhanced MRI within 12 months prior to administration of Magnevist
  • History of NSF
  • Clinically unstable or age <2 yrs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, BAY86-4882)
Participants received Magnevist in accordance with its labeling
Drug: Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, BAY86-4882)
Patients will be followed for 2 years after the administration of Magnevist at the approved dose to see if symptoms consistent with NSF develop

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Developed Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF), Based on Diagnostically Specific Clinical and Histopathological Information-cohort Analysis and Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Either clinical or histopathology score had to be at least 2 and the other at least 3 for diagnosis of NSF. Clinical score 2, 3 or 4 was derived from more than one minor criterion finding, one major criterion finding or more than one major criterion finding respectively. Major Criteria include patterned plaques, joint contractures, cobblestoning and marked induration/Peau d'orange (upper extremity or above knee); minor Criteria include puckering/linear banding, superficial (plaque/patch), dermal papules and scleral plaques (subject aged <45 years). Pathology score 2, 3 or 4 was derived from 2, 3 or at least 4 histological criteria findings respectively. Histological Criteria include increased cellularity (spindled and/or epithelioid) with few other inflammatory cells, CD34+ spindle or epithelioid cells in a reticular or parallel arrangement with "tram-tracking," presence of both fine collagen and ropey collagen surrounded by clefts, elastic fibers preserved and septal involvement.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Number of Participants Who Developed NSF, Based on Diagnostically Specific Clinical and Histopathological Information-full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Either clinical or histopathology score had to be at least 2 and the other at least 3 for diagnosis of NSF. Clinical score 2, 3 or 4 was derived from more than one minor criterion finding, one major criterion finding or more than one major criterion finding respectively. Major Criteria include patterned plaques, joint contractures, cobblestoning and marked induration/Peau d'orange (upper extremity or above knee); minor Criteria include puckering/linear banding, superficial (plaque/patch), dermal papules and scleral plaques (subject aged <45 years). Pathology score 2, 3 or 4 was derived from 2, 3 or at least 4 histological criteria findings respectively. Histological Criteria include increased cellularity (spindled and/or epithelioid) with few other inflammatory cells, CD34+ spindle or epithelioid cells in a reticular or parallel arrangement with "tram-tracking," presence of both fine collagen and ropey collagen surrounded by clefts, elastic fibers preserved and septal involvement.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Number of Participants Who Developed NSF, Based on Diagnostically Specific Clinical and Histopathological Information-cohort Analysis and Per Protocol Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Either clinical or histopathology score had to be at least 2 and the other at least 3 for diagnosis of NSF. Clinical score 2, 3 or 4 was derived from more than one minor criterion finding, one major criterion finding or more than one major criterion finding respectively. Major Criteria include patterned plaques, joint contractures, cobblestoning and marked induration/Peau d'orange (upper extremity or above knee); minor Criteria include puckering/linear banding, superficial (plaque/patch), dermal papules and scleral plaques (subject aged <45 years). Pathology score 2, 3 or 4 was derived from 2, 3 or at least 4 histological criteria findings respectively. Histological Criteria include increased cellularity (spindled and/or epithelioid) with few other inflammatory cells, CD34+ spindle or epithelioid cells in a reticular or parallel arrangement with "tram-tracking," presence of both fine collagen and ropey collagen surrounded by clefts, elastic fibers preserved and septal involvement.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Number of Participants Who Developed NSF, Based on Diagnostically Specific Clinical and Histopathological Information-per Protocol Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Either clinical or histopathology score had to be at least 2 and the other at least 3 for diagnosis of NSF. Clinical score 2, 3 or 4 was derived from more than one minor criterion finding, one major criterion finding or more than one major criterion finding respectively. Major Criteria include patterned plaques, joint contractures, cobblestoning and marked induration/Peau d'orange (upper extremity or above knee); minor Criteria include puckering/linear banding, superficial (plaque/patch), dermal papules and scleral plaques (subject aged <45 years). Pathology score 2, 3 or 4 was derived from 2, 3 or at least 4 histological criteria findings respectively. Histological Criteria include increased cellularity (spindled and/or epithelioid) with few other inflammatory cells, CD34+ spindle or epithelioid cells in a reticular or parallel arrangement with "tram-tracking," presence of both fine collagen and ropey collagen surrounded by clefts, elastic fibers preserved and septal involvement.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Number of Participants With Clinicopathological Correlation of 'NSF' or 'Consistent With NSF' and Subjects Without Biopsy Developing Clinical Signs Consistent With NSF-cohort Analysis and Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Either clinical or histopathology score need at least 2 and the other at least 3 for diagnosis of NSF. Clinical score 2, 3 or 4 required more than 1 minor criterion, 1 major criterion or more than 1 major criterion respectively. Major criteria: patterned plaques, joint contractures, cobblestoning, marked induration/Peau d'orange (upper extremity or above knee); minor Criteria: puckering/linear banding, superficial (plaque/patch), dermal papules, scleral plaques (subject aged <45 yrs). Pathology score 2, 3 or 4 required 2, 3 or at least 4 histological criteria respectively. Histological criteria include Increased cellularity with few other inflammatory cells, CD34+ spindle or epithelioid cells in a reticular or parallel arrangement with "tram-tracking," presence of fine collagen and ropey collagen surrounded by clefts, elastic fibers preserved and Septal involvement. A clinical score of 4 was suggestive of developing clinical signs consistent with NSF in subjects without biopsy.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Total Number of Participants With Clinicopathological Correlation of 'NSF' or 'Consistent With NSF' and Subjects Without Biopsy Developing Clinical Signs Consistent With NSF-full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Either clinical or histopathology score need at least 2 and the other at least 3 for diagnosis of NSF. Clinical score 2, 3 or 4 required more than 1 minor criterion, 1 major criterion or more than 1 major criterion respectively. Major criteria: patterned plaques, joint contractures, cobblestoning, marked induration/Peau d'orange (upper extremity or above knee); minor Criteria: puckering/linear banding, superficial (plaque/patch), dermal papules, scleral plaques (subject aged <45 yrs). Pathology score 2, 3 or 4 required 2, 3 or at least 4 histological criteria respectively. Histological criteria include Increased cellularity with few other inflammatory cells, CD34+ spindle or epithelioid cells in a reticular or parallel arrangement with "tram-tracking," presence of fine collagen and ropey collagen surrounded by clefts, elastic fibers preserved and Septal involvement. A clinical score of 4 was suggestive of developing clinical signs consistent with NSF in subjects without biopsy.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Total Number of Participants With Clinicopathological Correlation of 'NSF' or 'Consistent With NSF' and Subjects Without Biopsy Developing Clinical Signs Consistent With NSF-cohort Analysis and Per Protocol Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Either clinical or histopathology score need at least 2 and the other at least 3 for diagnosis of NSF. Clinical score 2, 3 or 4 required more than 1 minor criterion, 1 major criterion or more than 1 major criterion respectively. Major criteria: patterned plaques, joint contractures, cobblestoning, marked induration/Peau d'orange (upper extremity or above knee); minor Criteria: puckering/linear banding, superficial (plaque/patch), dermal papules, scleral plaques (subject aged <45 yrs). Pathology score 2, 3 or 4 required 2, 3 or at least 4 histological criteria respectively. Histological criteria include Increased cellularity with few other inflammatory cells, CD34+ spindle or epithelioid cells in a reticular or parallel arrangement with "tram-tracking," presence of fine collagen and ropey collagen surrounded by clefts, elastic fibers preserved and Septal involvement. A clinical score of 4 was suggestive of developing clinical signs consistent with NSF in subjects without biopsy.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Total Number of Participants With Clinicopathological Correlation of 'NSF' or 'Consistent With NSF' and Subjects Without Biopsy Developing Clinical Signs Consistent With NSF-per Protocol Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Either clinical or histopathology score need at least 2 and the other at least 3 for diagnosis of NSF. Clinical score 2, 3 or 4 required more than 1 minor criterion, 1 major criterion or more than 1 major criterion respectively. Major criteria: patterned plaques, joint contractures, cobblestoning, marked induration/Peau d'orange (upper extremity or above knee); minor Criteria: puckering/linear banding, superficial (plaque/patch), dermal papules, scleral plaques (subject aged <45 yrs). Pathology score 2, 3 or 4 required 2, 3 or at least 4 histological criteria respectively. Histological criteria include Increased cellularity with few other inflammatory cells, CD34+ spindle ore epithelioid cells in a reticular or parallel arrangement with "tram-tracking," presence of fine collagen and ropey collagen surrounded by clefts, elastic fibers preserved and Septal involvement. A clinical score of 4 was suggestive of developing clinical signs consistent with NSF in subjects without biopsy.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Reported in Association With the Administration of Magnevist-cohort Analysis and Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Adverse events occurring within 1 day after administration of Magnevist or skin-related adverse events occurring during follow-up (FU) were recorded.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Reported in Association With the Administration of Magnevist-full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Adverse events occurring within 1 day after administration of Magnevist or skin-related adverse events occurring during follow-up (FU) were recorded.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Reported in Association With the Administration of Magnevist-cohort Analysis and Per Protocol Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Adverse events occurring within 1 day after administration of Magnevist or skin-related adverse events occurring during follow-up (FU) were recorded.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Reported in Association With the Administration of Magnevist-per Protocol Set
Time Frame: Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist
Adverse events occurring within 1 day after administration of Magnevist or skin-related adverse events occurring during follow-up (FU) were recorded.
Up to 24 months following the administration of Magnevist

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bayer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 20, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 1, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 22, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 17, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 13256
  • X312141 (Other Identifier: Company internal)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings