A Study of Econazole Foam 1% in Athlete's Foot

December 5, 2012 updated by: AmDerma

A Multi-Center Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Vehicle Controlled, Parallel Group Comparison Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Econazole Nitrate Foam 1%, Econazole Nitrate 1% Cream, and Foam Vehicle in Subjects With Tinea Pedis

This is a 6-week clinical study (4 weeks of treatment, once per day, plus a 2-week follow-up period) of a topical foam to treat athlete's foot. The active ingredient in the foam -- econazole nitrate 1% -- is the same active pharmaceutical ingredient in a cream that your doctor can currently prescribe to treat athlete's foot. This study will help to understand if the foam works the same as the cream to treat athlete's foot.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Treating athlete's foot with a cream can leave a greasy, wet feeling on the foot that is uncomfortable to the user and messy on clothing and foot wear. A foam formulation that spreads easily and rubs-in easily that is as effective as the (reference) cream formulation in treating athlete's foot would be a benefit to the user. This study is designed to substantiate a clinical bridge between econazole nitrate foam 1% and econazole nitrate cream 1% based on clinical outcome, safety, and pharmacokinetic data. The study is (foam) vehicle-controlled and is randomized 1 to 1 to 1 (foam:cream:vehicle).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
135

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Stacy Smith, MD
    • Michigan
      • Clinton Township, Michigan, United States, 48038
        • Daniel Stewart, DO
    • Minnesota
      • Fridley, Minnesota, United States, 55432
        • Steven Kempers, MD
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37215
        • Michael Gold, MD
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
        • Michael Jarratt, MD
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84124
        • Leonard Swinyer, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be at least 18 years or age and of either sex.
  • Has a clinical diagnosis of tinea pedis with at least i) moderate scaling(interdigital and/or moccasin) and ii) mild erythema (interdigital only).
  • Be willing to give informed consent.
  • Be willing and able to give informed consent.
  • Has microscopic evidence (positive KOH) of the presence of fungi. Evaluable subjects must have a positive KOH and a fungal culture positive for a dermatophyte at Baseline. Subjects with a positive KOH may be entered into the study pending the results of the fungal culture.
  • Be in good health and free of any disease or physical condition which might, in the investigator's opinion, expose the subject to an unacceptable risk by study participation.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test and agree to use an effective, non-prohibited form of birth control for the duration of the study (abstinence, stabilized on oral contraceptives for at least two months, implant, injection, IUD, patch, NuvaRing, condom and spermicidal or diaphragm and spermicidal).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Is nursing or planning a pregnancy during the study.
  • Has used topical antifungal or corticosteroid therapy or systemic antibacterial therapy within 30 days prior to the start of the study.
  • Has received systemic antifungal therapy within 12 weeks prior to the start of the study medication.
  • Has a history of diabetes mellitus or is immunocompromised (due to disease, e.g., HIV, or medications).
  • Has concurrent tinea infection (in the opinion of the investigator). However, concurrent onychomycosis is allowed.
  • Has any other skin disease which might interfere with the evaluation of tinea pedis.
  • Is currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device study.
  • Has received an investigational drug or treatment with an investigational device within 30 days prior to entering this study
  • Is unreliable, including subjects with a history of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Has known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the study medications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 1
Econazole Nitrate Cream 1%
Drug: Econazole Nitrate Cream 1%
Topical cream, applied once daily for 4 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Econazole Nitrate Cream 1%, Fougera - Altana Inc.
Experimental: 2
Econazole Nitrate Foam 1%
Drug: Econazole Nitrate Foam 1%
Topical foam, applied once daily for 4 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Quinnova Econazole Nitrate Foam 1%
Placebo Comparator: 3
Vehicle Foam
Drug: Vehicle Foam
Topical foam, applied once daily for 4 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Quinnova Foam Vehicle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Cure Rate: Interdigital Disease
Time Frame: Day 43
A negative KOH and negative culture and no evidence of clinical disease as indicated by scores of 0 for each sign and symptom at Day 43.
Day 43
Complete Cure Rate: Moccasin Disease
Time Frame: 43 Days
A negative KOH and negative culture and no evidence of clinical disease as indicated by scores of 0 for each sign and symptom at Day 43.
43 Days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effective Treatment: Interdigital Disease
Time Frame: 43
Negative KOH, negative fungal culture, no or mild (a score of 0 or 1) erythema and/or scaling with all other signs or symptoms being absent (score = 0) at Day 43 (Week6).
43
Effective Treatment: Mocassin Disease
Time Frame: 43
Negative KOH, negative fungal culture, no or mild (a score of 0 or 1) erythema and/or scaling with all other signs or symptoms being absent (score = 0) at Day 43 (Week6).
43
Mycological Cure: Interdigital Disease
Time Frame: 43
Negative KOH and negative fungal culture at Day 43
43
Mycological Cure: Mocassin Disease
Time Frame: 43
Negative KOH and negative fungal culture at Day 43
43

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AmDerma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 7, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 7, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 8, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 9, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 5, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D79-2902-07

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings