Study of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone With or Without Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Relapsed or Not Controllable Multiple Myeloma

July 31, 2014 updated by: Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H

Randomized Phase III Study on Bortezomib and Low-Dose Dexamethasone With or Without Continuous Low-Dose Oral Cyclophosphamide for Primary Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to compare bortezomib, dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide to bortezomib and dexamethasone alone for primary refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multi-centre, randomized (the study drug is assigned by chance), controlled, open-label (all people involved in the study know the identity of the assigned drug), parallel (each group of patients will be treated at the same time) group phase III study to determine the efficacy of the standard therapy of bortezomib and low dose dexamethasone in combination with or without continuous low dose oral cyclophosphamide for primary refractory or relapsed myeloma patients (1st - 3rd relapse). The study will consist of screening period, which may last from day -14 until day -1 before application of the first dose of bortezomib (on cycle 1, day 1), treatment phase begins on cycle 1 day 1 and continues until completion or discontinuation of all study drugs and follow-up phase. All patients will be followed up after end of treatment regardless of their response. Eligible patients will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either treatment arms (Group A: receiving bortezomib plus dexamethasone or Group B receiving bortezomib plus dexamethasone plus cyclophosphamide). Patients will receive up to eight 3-weeks treatment cycles, unless they experience either unacceptable toxicity or if the patients request to withdraw from the study. The maximum number of cycles is dependent on patient response and investigator's discretion. It is recommended that patients with a confirmed complete response (CR) receive 2 additional cycles beyond a confirmation. Patients who do not achieve a CR but a partial response will receive a total of 8 cycles. For patients achieving stable disease it is within the investigator's discretion to continue study treatment beyond 6 cycles, after discussion with the sponsor. After completion of treatment the patients will be followed up every 12 weeks for up to 72 weeks. If the study is still ongoing a further follow up period will be done every 26 weeks until study end, or until the patient reaches progressive disease or start of alternative anti-myeloma therapy, if earlier. In case progressive disease (PD) has already been established during the treatment phase the patients will not enter the follow-up phase. In case of PD or start of alternative anti-myeloma treatment before the end of study the follow-up phase will be discontinued for the patient but the date of death of the patient will be documented (if applicable) before the end of study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
96

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Augsburg, Germany
      • Berlin, Germany
      • Bielefeld, Germany
      • Bremerhaven, Germany
      • Darmstadt, Germany
      • Donauwörth, Germany
      • Dresden, Germany
      • Frankfurt, Germany
      • Halle, Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany
      • Hamm, Germany
      • Hannover, Germany
      • Hildesheim, Germany
      • Hof, Germany
      • Koblenz, Germany
      • Köln, Germany
      • Lebach, Germany
      • Leer, Germany
      • Lübeck, Germany
      • Magdeburg, Germany
      • Mannheim, Germany
      • Moers, Germany
      • München, Germany
      • Münster, Germany
      • Neunkirchen, Germany
      • Offenburg, Germany
      • Oldenburg, Germany
      • Osnabrück, Germany
      • Passau, Germany
      • Porta Westfalica, Germany
      • Ravensburg, Germany
      • Rostock, Germany
      • Saarbrücken, Germany
      • Singen, Germany
      • Stuttgart, Germany
      • Velbert, Germany
      • Weiden, Germany
      • Wiesbaden, Germany
      • Würselen, Germany
      • Würzburg, Germany

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previously diagnosed with multiple myeloma
  • Primary refractory multiple myeloma or relapsed following 1 to 3 previous lines of therapy
  • Karnofsky performance status must be equal to 60 percentage (ie, better or equal performance than requiring some help and taking care of most personal requirements)
  • Has life expectancy estimated at screening must be of at least 6 months
  • Agrees to protocol-defined use of effective contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not received more than three previous lines of therapy for multiple myeloma
  • Not received nitrosoureas or any other chemotherapy or immunotherapy or antibody therapy for multiple myeloma within 6 to 8 weeks before enrolment. Plasmapheresis must not be applied within 2 weeks before enrolment
  • Patients with peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain of Grade 2 or greater intensity
  • Patients with poorly controlled cardio vascular, vascular, pulmonary, gastro-intestinal, endocrine, neurological, psychiatric, hepatic, renal or metabolic diseases or hematological disorders
  • Not have oligosecretory or non-secretory multiple myeloma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Vd (bortezomib + dexamethasone)

Participants received bortezomib at a dose of 1.3 mg/m² body surface area (BSA) for eight 3-week cycles. Within each cycle it was administered twice weekly (on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11) followed by a 10-day rest period (Days 12 through 21). They received single oral doses of 20 mg dexamethasone on Days

1 and 2, 4 and 5, 8 and 9, and 11 and 12 of each cycle.
Drug: Dexamethasone
Type=exact number, number=20, unit=mg, form=tablet, route=oral. The patients will receive 20 mg of dexamethasone on days 1+2,4+5,8+9,11+12 for 21 days for 8 cycles.
Drug: Bortezomib
Type=exact number, number=1.3, unit=mg, form=injection, route=intravenous. The patients will receive 1.3mg/m2 on days 1,4,8,11 for 21 days for 8 cycles.
Active Comparator: Vcd (bortezomib + low-dose dexamethasone + cyclophosphamide)
Participants received bortezomib at a dose of 1.3 mg/m² body surface area (BSA) for eight 3-week cycles. Within each cycle it was administered twice weekly (on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11) followed by a 10-day rest period (Days 12 through 21). They received single oral doses of 20 mg dexamethasone on Days 1 and 2, 4 and 5, 8 and 9, and 11 and 12 of each cycle and single oral doses of 50 mg cyclophosphamide on a once daily basis from Day 1, Cycle 1 continuously until Day 21, Cycle 8.
Drug: Dexamethasone
Type=exact number, number=20, unit=mg, form=tablet, route=oral. The patients will receive 20 mg of dexamethasone on days 1+2,4+5,8+9,11+12 for 21 days for 8 cycles.
Drug: Bortezomib
Type=exact number, number=1.3, unit=mg, form=injection, route=intravenous. The patients will receive 1.3mg/m2 on days 1,4,8,11 for 21 days for 8 cycles.
Drug: Cyclophosphamide
Type=exact number, number=50, unit=mg, form=tablet, route=oral. The patients will receive 50 mg of cyclophosphamide once daily continuously from cycle 1 to 8.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Progression of Disease
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the disease progression or participant's death from any cause whichever occurred first, as assessed up to 72 weeks after end of treatment visit (ie, 46 days after last dose of study medication)
'Median time to progression of disease is assessed according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria or death from any cause. IMWG criteria: increase of >=25% from lowest level in Serum M-component or (the absolute increase must be >=0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dL]); Urine M component or (the absolute increase must be >=200 milligram per 24 hour. Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels. The absolute increase >10 mg/dL. Bone marrow plasma cell percentage >=10%. Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing. Development of hypercalcemia. Participants who died or dropped out due to any reason without progression will be censored with the day of death or drop-out, respectively and who are alive at the end of the study without any progression was censored with the last available date.
From the date of randomization until the disease progression or participant's death from any cause whichever occurred first, as assessed up to 72 weeks after end of treatment visit (ie, 46 days after last dose of study medication)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the disease progression or participant's death from any cause whichever occured first, as assessed up to 72 weeks after end of treatment visit (ie, 46 days after last dose of study medication)
PFS is defined as time from randomization to myeloma progression according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria or death from any cause. IMWG criteria: increase of ≥25 percent from lowest response level in Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL) Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24 hour. Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels. The absolute increase must be >10 mg/dL. Bone marrow plasma cell percentage: the absolute percent must be ≥10 percent. Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.65mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. PFS included disease progression as well as death.
From the date of randomization until the disease progression or participant's death from any cause whichever occured first, as assessed up to 72 weeks after end of treatment visit (ie, 46 days after last dose of study medication)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until Month 49
Time interval in months time from randomisation to death from any cause.
From the date of randomization until Month 49
Overall Response Rate (ORR) - International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria
Time Frame: Up to 46 days after last bortezomib dose, or as soon as possible after early discontinuation of study treatment or before start of alternative anti-myeloma therapy
Percentage of participants who achieved stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) is reported in the below table. IMWG criteria- CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow; sCR: CR+Normal free light chain ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescencec; PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90%; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg per 24 hour.
Up to 46 days after last bortezomib dose, or as soon as possible after early discontinuation of study treatment or before start of alternative anti-myeloma therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 18, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 22, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 15, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 31, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR015247
  • 26866138MMY3022 (Other Identifier: Janssen-Cilag G.m.b.H, Germany)
  • 2008-003213-27 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings