Safety and Effectiveness of the Calhoun Vision Light Adjustable Intraocular Lens (LAL)
A Prospective Multi-center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) in Subjects Undergoing Cataract Extraction
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Zona Rio
-
Tijuana, Zona Rio, Mexico, 22320
- CODET Vision Institute
-
-
-
-
California
-
Los Altos, California, United States, 94024
- Altos Eye Physicians
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90024
- Maloney Vision Institute
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
- Price Vision Group
-
-
Kansas
-
Leawood, Kansas, United States, 66211
- Discover Vision Centers
-
-
Missouri
-
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States, 63017
- Pepose Vision Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pre-operative regular corneal astigmatism less than or equal to 1.00 diopters by keratometry.
- Adults between the ages of 40 and 80 inclusive.
- Cataract causing reduction in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity to a level of 20/32 or worse.
- Best corrected visual acuity projected (by clinical estimate based upon past ocular history and retinal exam) to be 20/25 or better after cataract removal and IOL implantation.
- Clear intraocular media other than cataract.
- Potentially good vision in the fellow eye with BCVA 20/40 or better.
- Willing and able to comply with the schedule for power adjustment/lock-in treatments and the schedule for follow-up visits.
- Fully dilated pupil diameter of more than or equal to 7.0 mm.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Zonular laxity or dehiscence.
- Pseudoexfoliation.
- Age related macular degeneration involving the presence of geographic atrophy or soft drusen.
- Retinal degenerative disorder that is expected to cause future vision loss.
- Diabetes with any evidence of retinopathy.
- Evidence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
- History of uveitis.
- Significant anterior segment pathology, such as rubeosis iridis, aniridia, or iris coloboma.
- Corneal pathology that is either progressive or sufficient to reduce BCVA to 20/25 or worse.
- Keratoconus or suspected of having keratoconus.
- Corneal dystrophy including basement membrane dystrophy.
- Previous corneal or intraocular surgery
- Systemic medication that may increase sensitivity to UV light such as tetracycline, doxycycline, psoralens, amiodarone, and phenothiazines.
- Complications during cataract surgery including posterior capsule rupture, zonular rupture, radial capsulorhexis tear, vitreous loss, iris trauma, corneal complications or any intraoperative abnormality that may affect the postoperative pupillary dilation, or the centration or tilt of the intraocular lens.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Lens implantation +1.00 diopter (D) postop target
Lens implant power calculated for postoperative MRSE target of +1.00 D
|
Lens implantation +1.00 D postoperative MRSE target.
Light Delivery Device treatment based on postoperative manifest refraction.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Lens implantation -1.00 D postop target
Lens implant power calculated for postoperative MRSE target of -1.00 D
|
Lens implantation -1.00 D postoperative MRSE target.
Light Delivery Device treatment based on postoperative manifest refraction.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Lens implantation 0.00 D postop target
Lens implant power calculated for postoperative MRSE target of 0.00 D
|
Lens implantation 0.00 D postoperative MRSE target.
Light Delivery Device treatment based on postoperative manifest refraction.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes Achieving a Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within ± 0.50 D of the Intended Adjustment Target
Time Frame: 6 months post-operative
|
Predictability of post-operative refractive adjustments of the implanted LAL, with 75% of the eyes achieving a manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) within ± 0.50 D of the intended adjustment target at the point of stability.
All three arms of the study had the same end point so the results were presented as one combined cohort.
|
6 months post-operative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Eyes With Improvement in Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA)
Time Frame: 6 months post operative
|
Improvement in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA): For those best case eyes with a pre-light treatment UCVA of 20/50 or worse, 65% of eyes should have an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better at the refractive stable point after the adjustment and lock-in treatments.
All three arms of the study had the same end point so the results were presented as one combined cohort.
|
6 months post operative
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) of 20/40 or Better
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA): The percentage of eyes achieving overall and best case BSCVA of 20/40 or better should be comparable to the FDA grid of historical controls for intraocular lenses.
All three arms of the study had the same end point so the results were presented as one combined cohort.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: R. Doyle Stulting, MD, PhD, Emory Eye Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CSP 002-00
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.