A Phase 1 First-in-Human Study Evaluating AMG 900 in Advanced Solid Tumors

May 2, 2019 updated by: Amgen

A Phase 1, First-in-Human Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Orally Administered AMG 900 in Adult Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors

This first-in-human study of AMG 900 will be conducted in two parts: dose escalation and dose expansion. The dose escalation part of the study is aimed at evaluating the safety, tolerability and PK of oral AMG 900 in subjects with advanced solid tumors. Up to 50 subjects may be enrolled in dose escalation. The dose expansion part of the study will consist of 42 subjects in three taxane-resistant tumor types. The dose of AMG 900 will be dependent upon data from the dose escalation part of the study

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

that G-CSF must be started at day 5, 1 day after the last day of AMG 900 and be continued until neutrophiles are > 1000 or until day 12, meaning 2 days before the reinduction.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
95

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • South Australia
      • Kurralta Park, South Australia, Australia, 5037
        • Research Site
    • Victoria
      • Bentleigh East, Victoria, Australia, 3165
        • Research Site
      • Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3050
        • Research Site
  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
        • Research Site
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Research Site
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • Research Site
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89148
        • Research Site
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87131
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men or women ≥ 18 years old
  • Part 1 Dose Escalation only: advanced solid tumor refractory to standard treatment for which no standard therapy is available or the subject refuses standard therapy
  • Part 1 Dose Escalation only: Measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST guidelines
  • Part 2 Dose Expansion only: Taxane-resistant tumor (defined as refractory to or progression within 6 months of discontinuing paclitaxel or docetaxel) of prespecified histology
  • Part 2 Dose Expansion only: Measurable disease per RECIST guidelines
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of ≤ 2
  • Life expectancy of > 3 months, in the opinion of the investigator
  • Willing to provide existing and/or future paraffin-embedded tumor samples
  • Part 1 Dose Escalation: must have tumor tissue that is accessible for biopsy by fine needle aspiration (FNA) and must consent to undergo biopsies of their tumor (subjects in non-accelerated phase only)
  • Ability to take oral medications
  • Competent to sign and date an Institutional Review Board approved informed consent form
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
  • Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L
  • Hemoglobin > 9 g/dL
  • Prothrombin time (PT) or partial thromboplastin time (PTT) < 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Serum creatinine < 2.0 mg/dL
  • Calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min
  • AST < 2.5 x ULN (if liver or bone metastases are present, ≤ 5 x ULN)
  • ALT < 2.5 x ULN (if liver or bone metastases are present, ≤ 5 x ULN)
  • Alkaline phosphatase < 2.0 x ULN (if liver or bone metastases are present, ≤ 5 x ULN)
  • Total bilirubin < 1.5 x ULN

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active parenchymal brain metastases. Subjects who have had brain metastases resected or have received radiation therapy ending at least 4 weeks prior to study day 1 are eligible if they meet all of the following criteria: a) residual neurological symptoms grade < 1; b) no dexamethasone requirement; and c) follow-up MRI shows no new lesions appearing
  • Prior bone marrow transplant (autologous or allogeneic)
  • History or presence of hematological malignancies
  • History of bleeding diathesis
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months of study day 1, symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association > class II), unstable angina, or unstable cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication
  • Active peptic ulcer disease
  • Gastrointestinal (GI) tract disease causing the inability to take oral medication, malabsorption syndrome, requirement for intravenous alimentation, prior surgical procedures affecting absorption, uncontrolled inflammatory GI disease (eg, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis)
  • Active infection requiring intravenous (IV) antibiotics within 2 weeks of study enrollment (day 1)
  • Known positive test for HIV
  • Active or chronic hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection, determined by serologic tests
  • Unresolved toxicities from prior anti-tumor therapy, defined as not having resolved to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 0 or 1, or to levels dictated in the eligibility criteria with the exception of alopecia
  • Anti-tumor therapy within 28 days of study day 1; concurrent use of hormone deprivation therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer or breast cancer is permitted
  • Treatment with immune modulators including, but not limited to, corticosteroids, cyclosporine and tacrolimus within two weeks prior to enrollment
  • Therapeutic or palliative radiation therapy within two weeks of study day 1
  • Systemic anticoagulation therapy, including warfarin, within 28 days of day 1
  • Prior treatment with aurora inhibitors
  • Prior participation in an investigational study (drug or device) within 28 days of study day 1
  • Major surgery within 28 days of study day 1
  • Any co-morbid medical disorder that may increase the risk of toxicity, in the opinion of the investigator or sponsor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm 1- Dose Expansion
The dose expansion part of the study will begin after completion of the dose escalation phase and will consist of 3 cohorts of 14 subjects each. One taxane-resistant tumor type will be evaluated in each cohort.
Drug: Arm 1- Dose Expansion
AMG 900 is a small molecule inhibitor of aurora kinases A, B and C. AMG 900 will be administered daily for 4 days every 2 weeks (i.e., 4 consecutive days of dosing followed by 10 consecutive days off treatment).
EXPERIMENTAL: Arm 1- Dose Escalation
The dose escalation part of the study is aimed at determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AMG 900 and if necessary, the MTD with prophylactic GCSF support (MTD-G).
Drug: Arm 1- Dose Escalation
AMG 900 is a small molecule inhibitor of aurora kinases A, B and C. AMG 900 will be administered daily for 4 days every 2 weeks (i.e., 4 consecutive days of dosing followed by 10 consecutive days off treatment).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Safety: subject incidence of adverse events, first-cycle DLTs and clinically significant changes in vital signs, weight, ECGs and clinical laboratory tests
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
PK profile: AMG 900 PK parameters including, but not limited to, maximum observed concentration (Cmax), minimum observed concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve and, if feasible, half-life
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Change in levels of p-Histone H3 from baseline (part 1 - dose escalation only)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Response rate in each taxane-resistant tumor type assessed per RECIST guidelines (part 2 - dose expansion only)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in tumor volume from baseline measured by volumetric CT or MRI
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Tumor response measured by CT or MRI and assessed per RECIST guidelines
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Change from baseline in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) using 18FLT-PET/CT (part 2 - dose expansion only)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amgen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 10, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 3, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 26, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 9, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 2, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20080016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the link below.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings