Three Different Therapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Hodgkin Lymphoma

September 15, 2016 updated by: French Innovative Leukemia Organisation

Study Characterizing the Impact of Different Therapeutic Strategies on Event Occurrence at 2 Years, 5 Years, 10 Years, and 15 Years, According to Prognostic Groups in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving drugs in different combinations may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet know which treatment regimen is more effective in treating Hodgkin lymphoma.

PURPOSE: This phase III trial is studying three different therapy regimens to compare how well they work in treating patients with previously untreated Hodgkin lymphoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Evaluate event-free survival.

Secondary

  • Evaluate overall survival.
  • Evaluate the prognostic value of FDG-PET scanning.
  • Evaluate progression-free survival.
  • Evaluate tolerability.
  • Evaluate rate of relapse.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups according to prognosis.

  • Group 1 (favorable prognosis): Patients receive ABVD chemotherapy comprising doxorubicin hydrochloride IV, bleomycin sulfate IV, vincristine sulfate IV, dacarbazine IV, and methylprednisolone IV on days 1 and 14. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 2 courses. Patients then undergo PET scan for evaluation of response. Patients receive additional treatment according to response.

    • Favorable response: Patients with favorable response receive 1 additional course of ABVD chemotherapy.
    • Unfavorable response: Patients with unfavorable response receive 1 course of VABEM chemotherapy comprising vindesine IV continuously on days 1-5, doxorubicin hydrochloride IV continuously on days 1-3, carmustine IV on day 3, etoposide IV on days 3-5, and methylprednisolone IV on days 1-5.

  • Group 2 (intermediate prognosis): Patients receive 2 courses of ABVD chemotherapy. Patients then undergo PET scan for evaluation of response. Patients receive additional treatment according to response.

    • Favorable response: Patients with favorable response receive 4 additional courses of ABVD chemotherapy.
    • Unfavorable response: Patients with unfavorable response receive VABEM chemotherapy. Treatment with VABEM chemotherapy repeats every 28 days for 2 courses.

  • Group 3 (poor prognosis): Patients receive 2 courses of VABEM chemotherapy. Patients then undergo PET scan for evaluation of response. Patients receive additional treatment according to response.

    • Favorable response: Patients with favorable response receive 1 additional course of VABEM chemotherapy.

    • Unfavorable response: Patients with unfavorable response receive CEO chemotherapy comprising cisplatin IV continuously on days 1-3, gemcitabine hydrochloride IV on days 1 and 8, and oral dexamethasone once daily on days 1-4. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 3 courses. Patients then undergo PET scan. Patients receive additional treatment according to response.

      • Favorable response: Patients with favorable response receive BEAM chemotherapy comprising carmustine IV on day -7, etoposide IV and cytarabine IV on days -6 to -3, and melphalan IV on day -2. Patients then undergo autologous stem cell transplantation on day 0.
      • Unfavorable response: Patients with unfavorable response receive MINE chemotherapy comprising mitoguazone IV, vinorelbine ditartrate IV, and ifosfamide IV on days 1-5 and etoposide IV on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 3 courses. Patients then undergo allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation.

Patients with favorable response or a "bulky" mass at diagnosis may also undergo radiotherapy.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for 15 years.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
442

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Tours Cedex, France, 37044
        • FILO French Innovative Leukemia Organization

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Life expectancy > 3 months
  • LVEF normal
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • Must be able to undergo follow-up for ≥ 15 years
  • No impaired cardiac function that would preclude the administration of an anthracycline
  • No other prior or concurrent malignancy, except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell skin cancer
  • No respiratory, kidney, or liver failure or other severe clinical insufficiency that would preclude study treatment
  • No HIV or hepatitis B virus positivity
  • No other disease that would preclude treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • No concurrent participation in another experimental trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group 1 (favorable prognosis)
Patients receive ABVD and VABEM chemotherapy.
Drug: carmustine
Given IV
Drug: etoposide
Given IV
Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride
Given IV
Drug: vincristine sulfate
Given IV
Drug: methylprednisolone
Given IV
Biological: bleomycin sulfate
Given IV
Drug: dacarbazine
Given IV
Drug: ABVD regimen
Given IV
Drug: vindesine
Given IV
Experimental: Group 2 (intermediate prognosis)
Patients receive ABVD and VABEM chemotherapy.
Drug: carmustine
Given IV
Drug: etoposide
Given IV
Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride
Given IV
Drug: vincristine sulfate
Given IV
Drug: methylprednisolone
Given IV
Biological: bleomycin sulfate
Given IV
Drug: dacarbazine
Given IV
Drug: ABVD regimen
Given IV
Drug: vindesine
Given IV
Experimental: Group 3 (poor prognosis)
Patients receive VABEM, CEO, BEAM, and MINE chemotherapy. Patients also undergo allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation.
Drug: dexamethasone
Given orally
Drug: carmustine
Given IV
Drug: etoposide
Given IV
Drug: cytarabine
Given IV
Drug: melphalan
Given IV
Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride
Given IV
Drug: doxorubicin hydrochloride
Given IV
Drug: vinorelbine tartrate
Given IV
Drug: cisplatin
Given IV
Drug: methylprednisolone
Given IV
Drug: ifosfamide
Given IV
Procedure: autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Patients undergo autologous stem cell transplantation
Drug: vindesine
Given IV
Drug: mitoguazone
Given IV
Procedure: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Patients undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Event-free survival
Time Frame: treatments evaluation
event free survival
treatments evaluation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
French Innovative Leukemia Organisation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Delphine Senecal, French Innovative Leukemia Organization

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 12, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 15, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 15, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LH 2007

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on dexamethasone

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings