Efficacy of an Early Antipsychotic Switch in Case of Poor Initial Response to the Treatment of Schizophrenia

July 2, 2024 updated by: Technical University of Munich

The Switch Study - Efficacy of Early Antipsychotic Switch Versus Maintenance in Patients With Schizophrenia Poorly Responding to Two Weeks of Antipsychotic Treatment

The main aim of the trial is to study whether a change of medication in non-responders to a two-weeks antipsychotic drug trial is more effective than continued treatment with the same antipsychotic. Hypothesis: Non-responders who are switched at 2 weeks to another antipsychotic are more frequently in symptomatic remission at week 8 than non-responders who stay on the same antipsychotic

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The patients will be randomised to a double-blind 2 week run in phase with fixed doses of either oral amisulpride 800 mg/day or olanzapine 20mg/day.

Those participants who have not responded to treatment at two weeks (PANSS improvement <25%) will be randomised to a 6 week double blind flexible dose phase:

  1. Experimental intervention: switch to the other antipsychotic (oral olanzapine 5-20mg/d or oral amisulpride 200-800 mg/d)
  2. Control intervention: continuation with the same drug as in the first 2 weeks in flexible dose ranges as above for another six weeks Those participants who have responded at week 2 (≥25% PANSS reduction) will continue on the same drug in flexible dose ranges as above Total duration of intervention per patient: 8 weeks

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
350

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
    • Bavaria
      • Munic, Bavaria, Germany, 81675
        • Psychiatrische Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Technischen Universitaet Muenchen am Klinikum rechts der Isar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inpatients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition Text Revision (DSM-IV TR) diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizophreniform or schizoaffective disorder
  • PANSS total score at baseline > 75, at least two PANSS psychosis items ≥ 4, Clinical Global Impression of severity score moderately ill or more (≥4)
  • Increase in the level of care (outpatient care to day clinic or inpatient care)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication to study drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: initial amisulpride
Drug: Olanzapine or amisulpride
Oral olanzapine 5mg to 20mg/d OR oral amisulpride 200mg to 800mg/d; both preferably once daily, both encapsulated for blinding
Active Comparator: early responders
Drug: Olanzapine or amisulpride
Oral olanzapine 5mg to 20mg/d OR oral amisulpride 200mg to 800mg/d; both preferably once daily, both encapsulated for blinding
Active Comparator: early non-responders switched
Drug: Olanzapine or amisulpride
Oral olanzapine 5mg to 20mg/d OR oral amisulpride 200mg to 800mg/d; both preferably once daily, both encapsulated for blinding
Active Comparator: ealy non-responders non-switched
Drug: Olanzapine or amisulpride
Oral olanzapine 5mg to 20mg/d OR oral amisulpride 200mg to 800mg/d; both preferably once daily, both encapsulated for blinding
Active Comparator: initial olanzapine
Drug: Olanzapine or amisulpride
Oral olanzapine 5mg to 20mg/d OR oral amisulpride 200mg to 800mg/d; both preferably once daily, both encapsulated for blinding

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients in Symptomatic Remission at Week 8 Comparing the "Switched" With the "Non Switched" Early Non-responders
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Remission is defined as a maximum rating of 3 points (equals a severity rating of "mild") in each of all the following eight items of the PANSS (Kay et al.) rating scale: Delusions (P1), unusual thought content (G9), hallucinatory behavior (P3), conceptual disorganization (P2), mannerisms/posturing (G5), blunted affect (N1), social withdrawal (N4) and lack of spontaneity (N6); if one item is >3 the remission status is "no" (non-remission); all times have a rating from 1 to 7, so the min. rating is 8, the max. rating is 56. Remission is a dichotomous item (yes/no) without a specific min. or max. rating
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PANSS Total Score Change
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA: The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bull 1987; 13:261-276) is a 30- item inventory assessing the absence or severity of schizophrenia symptoms across three subscales: positive symptoms (items P1-P7, including hallucinatory behavior, delusions, and conceptual disorganization), negative symptoms (items N1-N7, including blunted affect, social and emotional withdrawal, and lack of spontaneity), and general psychopathology symptoms (items G1-G16, including mannerisms and posturing, unusual thought content, and lack of insight). Each item is scored on a scale ranging from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme), with item ratings incorporating the presence, effects of symptoms on an individuum's thinking, feeling or behaving as well as their severity. The min. sum rating is 30, the max. sum rating is 210.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Technical University of Munich

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stefan Leucht, MD, Psychiatrische Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Technischen Universität München am Klinikum rechts der Isar

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 9, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 10, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 01KG0910

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings