Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) for Nodal Staging in Esophageal Cancer (CT0003)

June 20, 2012 updated by: Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
The purpose of this study is determine if performing endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) in addition to standard endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can increase the precision and accuracy of staging esophageal cancer in comparison to EUS alone. The expectation is that EBUS can be used to biopsy lymph nodes that: (1) because of their position in the mediastinum would be inaccessible to EUS, or (2) would be inaccessible due to their position behind the esophageal tumor.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Problem:

    Endoscopic ultrasound techniques are becoming more and more popular. The safety of these technologies has been demonstrated on multiple occasions. These minimally invasive trans-luminal techniques do not require general anesthesia and can be performed, rapidly, accurately and at low cost. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) has been used by pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons primarily for the staging, diagnosis and management of lung cancer. Its efficacy and safety has been demonstrated in multiple studies.

    EBUS is not currently utilized by most centers in the staging of esophageal cancer. To date, no study has explored the possible use of EBUS for peritumoral lymph node biopsy, nor for biopsy of any suspicious mediastinal lymph nodes, not accessible by EUS. At Notre Dame Hospital, Centre Hospitalier de L'Universite de Montreal, all patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer undergo complete EUS staging followed by EBUS during the same procedure, in order to examine all the lymph nodes near or far from the primary tumor amenable to EBUS guided trans-bronchial biopsy. This is important because it allows physicians to bypass the primary tumor and pass through the normal (non-cancerous) bronchial wall, eliminating any chances of tumoral contamination of the sample. In addition, this also provides a much more complete mediastinal staging as it allows biopsy of a population of lymph nodes non-accessible to EUS biopsy. Thus far, we have performed EBUS in six patients with esophageal cancer with upstaging of the N stage of the tumor in two of these patients (33%). There have been no morbidities and all patients have been discharged home on the day of the procedure. EBUS was therefore able to change the treatment strategy, without adding any morbidity, discomfort or additional procedural time for two out of six patients.

    The proposed project will be the first study ever to evaluate the impact of EBUS on esophageal cancer staging as well as on the choice of therapy. This study consists of a prospective cohort study with no placebo group, all patients will have EBUS and stages obtained with and without EBUS will be compared as well as changes to the treatment plan based on EBUS staging.

  2. Objectives:

    • Examine the impact of adding EBUS to the gold standard work-up on esophageal cancer staging.
    • Examine the impact of adding EBUS to the gold standard work-up on the treatment plan for patients newly diagnosed with esophageal cancer.

  3. Methodology:

    The study consists of a prospective cohort study. Each patient will serve as his/her own control. All patients currently undergoing esophageal cancer staging in the Division of Thoracic Surgery at the CHUM will be approached for enrolment into the study.

    EUS followed by EBUS will be performed during the EUS staging procedure. The order of procedures for all patients is as follows: (1) Flexible Esophagoscopy with endoluminal biopsy, (2) Radial EUS for T staging (3) Linear EUS for lymph node biopsy and N staging, (4) Flexible Bronchoscopy for evaluation of the left mainstem bronchus for tumor invasion, (5) Linear EBUS for trans-tracheal and trans-bronchial lymph node biopsy.

    All FNA samples will be evaluated using standard methods by cytopathologists at the CHUM. Results will be evaluated for: (A) positivity, (B) negativity (no tumor cells, positive lymphocytes), (C) inadequacy (no tumor cells, no lymphocytes). A minimum of two passes will be performed into each lymph node.

    Patients will be discharged on the same day, as their procedure. Results will be discussed with them in a follow-up clinic appointment with their thoracic surgeon within 3 weeks of the procedure. Any procedure-related morbidity will be documented in the post-procedural period as well as at their follow-up appointment.

  4. Expected Results:

We believe that by adding EBUS to the gold standard work up and staging of esophageal cancer, we can make a significant difference in esophageal cancer staging. This may also significantly change the choice of therapy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 4M1
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Biopsy proven esophageal cancer
  • Endoluminal esophageal mass without previous biopsy
  • Medical suitability for endoscopic procedure
  • Ability to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient on Coumadin (Warfarin) or Plavix (Clopidogrel) with inability to stop medication for 5 days prior to procedure
  • Anatomy precluding EBUS
  • Endobronchial tumor
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome measure will be the accuracy of the combination of EUS and EBUS to correctly diagnose the presence or absence of mediastinal lymph node metastases compared to EUS alone.
Time Frame: 6 months intervals
6 months intervals

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The safety of all diagnostic techniques will be evaluated and compared between techniques.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Procedure-related morbidity
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Change in treatment plan based on EBUS
Time Frame: Study termination
Study termination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
C.E.T.O.C. - CHUM Endoscopic Tracheobronchial and Oesophageal Center
Marcel and Rolande Gosselin Chair in Thoracic Surgical Oncology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 22, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 22, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 24, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 22, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CE 09.146

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings