A Trial To Assess The Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, And Pharmacodynamics Of Single Doses Of PF-04937319 In Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

January 20, 2017 updated by: Pfizer

A Phase 1 Placebo-controlled Trial To Assess The Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, And Pharmacodynamics Of Single Escalating Oral Doses Of Pf-04937319 In Adult Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-04937319 following single escalating oral doses in adult subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this phase 1 study is to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF04937319 following single escalating oral doses in adult subjects with T2DM.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85013
        • Dedicated Phase 1
    • California
      • Cypress, California, United States, 90630
        • West Coast Clinical Trials, Llc
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33169
        • Elite Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are taking stable doses of metformin only. Subjects treated with a sulfonylurea (SU) or a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor (DPP-IVi) in combination with metformin may be eligible if washed off the SU or DPP-IVi to metformin only for a minimum of 4 weeks before dosing.
  • Male and/or female subjects (females will be women of non childbearing potential) between the ages of 18 and 65 years, inclusive, with a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 to 45.0 kg/m2 and C-peptide >0.8 ng/mL.
  • Screening and Day -2 troponin I concentration </=0.05 ng/mL as measured by the Bayer Centaur Ultra assay.
  • HbA1c >/=7% and </=11%. If the patient requires to be washed off an SU or DPP-IVi, the HbA1c limits will be >/=7% and </=9.5%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence or history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurologic, or allergic disease (including drug allergies, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies at time of dosing).
  • Evidence or history of diabetic complications with significant end organ damage, eg, proliferative retinopathy and/or macular edema, creatinine clearance </=60 mL/min based on the Cockcroft-Gault equation, diabetic neuropathy complicated by neuropathic ulcers.
  • History of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months. Additionally, history of coronary artery bypass graft or stent implantation, clinically significant peripheral vascular disease, or congestive heart failure (NYHA Classes II-IV). Furthermore, a current history of angina/unstable angina. Also, 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrating QTc >450 msec at screening, ECG findings suggestive of asymptomatic myocardial ischemia, or supine blood pressure >/=160 mm Hg (systolic) or </=100 mm Hg (diastolic).
  • One or more self reported episodes of hypoglycemia within the last 3 months, or two or more self reported episodes of hypoglycemia within the last 6 months.
  • Screening or Day -2 fasting (>/=8 hours) blood glucose, </=70 or >/=270 mg/dL, confirmed by a single repeat if deemed necessary.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
In each ascending-dose cohort, approximately 6 subjects will receive active treatment and 3 will receive placebo.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo to match PF-04937319 will be provided.
Experimental: PF-04937319
In each ascending-dose cohort, approximately 6 subjects will receive active treatment and 3 will receive placebo. There will be approximately 6 dosing levels of PF-04937319
Drug: PF-04937319
The initial planned dosing schedule is: 10, 30, 100, 200, and 400 mg, with one cohort to be determined. Doses shown may be adjusted upwards or downwards and may be adjusted to include intermediate doses. All doses will be administered as a single oral dose as a powder-in-capsule (PIC) formulation. PF-04937319 will be supplied as 10 mg and 80 mg (and potentially 1 mg) PIC.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Day 1 up to 10 days after last dose of study medication (up to 11 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 10 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Day 1 up to 10 days after last dose of study medication (up to 11 days)
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F)
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood.
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug.
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2)
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
Plasma decay half-life (t1/2) is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf)
Time Frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose
AUCinf is the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to extrapolated infinite time.
0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 hours post-dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Ratio of C-peptide Area Under Curve (C-peptide AUC) to Glucose Area Under Curve (Glucose AUC) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) on Day 1
Time Frame: -46, -45.75, -45.5, -45, -44.5, -44, -43, -42 hours pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 hours post-dose on Day 1
Ratio of area under the plasma C-peptide concentration-time curve from time 2 to 6 hrs (in terms of nanogram*deciliter*hour [ng*dL*hour]) to area under the plasma glucose concentration-time curve from time 2 to 6 hrs (in terms of milligram*milliliter*hour [mg*mL*hour]) was calculated. Linear trapezoidal method was used to compute AUC. The change in ratio from baseline (Day -1) was calculated at Day 1.
-46, -45.75, -45.5, -45, -44.5, -44, -43, -42 hours pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 hours post-dose on Day 1
Percent Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial Glucose Area Under the Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC [2-6]) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) on Day 1
Time Frame: -46, -45.75, -45.5, -45, -44.5, -44, -43, -42 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Percent change from baseline in post-prandial area under the plasma glucose concentration-time curve as determined by standardized MMTT. Linear trapezoidal method was used to compute AUC. Baseline value was the AUC (2-6) calculated on Day -1.
-46, -45.75, -45.5, -45, -44.5, -44, -43, -42 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Percent Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial Insulin Area Under the Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC [2-6]) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) on Day 1
Time Frame: -46, -45.75, -45.5, -45, -44.5, -44, -43, -42 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Percent change from baseline in post-prandial area under the plasma insulin concentration-time curve as determined by standardized MMTT. Linear trapezoidal method was used to compute AUC. Baseline value was the AUC (2-6) calculated on Day -1.
-46, -45.75, -45.5, -45, -44.5, -44, -43, -42 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Percent Change From Baseline in Post-Prandial C-peptide Area Under the Curve From Time 2 to 6 Hours (AUC [2-6]) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) on Day 1
Time Frame: -46, -45.75, -45.5, -45, -44.5, -44, -43, -42 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Percent change from baseline in post-prandial area under the plasma C-peptide concentration-time curve as determined by standardized MMTT. Linear trapezoidal method was used to compute AUC. Baseline value was the AUC (2-6) calculated on Day -1.
-46, -45.75, -45.5, -45, -44.5, -44, -43, -42 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Insulin Delta C30 to Glucose Delta C30 After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) on Day 1
Time Frame: -46, -45.5 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.5 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Ratio of insulin delta C30 (in terms of milliunits*deciliter [mU*dL]) to glucose delta C30 (in terms of milligram*liter [mg*liter]) was calculated. The change in ratio from baseline (Day -1) was calculated at Day 1.
-46, -45.5 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.5 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Change From Baseline in Ratio of C-peptide Delta C30 to Glucose Delta C30 After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT)
Time Frame: -46, -45.5 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.5 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Ratio of C-peptide Delta C30 (in terms of nanogram*deciliter [ng*dL]) to glucose delta C30 (in terms of milligram*milliliter [mg*mL]) was calculated. The change in ratio from baseline (Day -1) was calculated at Day 1.
-46, -45.5 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.5 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Insulin Area Under Curve (Insulin AUC) to Glucose Area Under Curve (Glucose AUC) After a Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT) on Day 1
Time Frame: -46, -45.75, -45.5, -45, -44.5, -44, -43, -42 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 hrs post-dose on Day 1
Ratio of area under the plasma insulin concentration-time curve from time 2 to 6 hrs (in terms of milliunit*deciliter*hour [mU*dL*hour]) to area under the plasma glucose concentration-time curve from time 2 to 6 hrs (in terms of milligram*liter*hour [mg*liter*hour]) was calculated. Linear trapezoidal method was used to compute AUC. The change in ratio from baseline (Day -1) was calculated at Day 1.
-46, -45.75, -45.5, -45, -44.5, -44, -43, -42 hrs pre-dose on Day -1; 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6 hrs post-dose on Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 7, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 7, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 8, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 20, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B1621001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings