Open Label Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib in Confirmed Genetic BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Pats

August 11, 2025 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Phase II, Open Label, Non Randomised, Non Comparative, Multicentre Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Given Orally Twice Daily in Patients With Advanced Cancers Who Have a Confirmed Genetic BRCA 1 and/or BRCA2 Mutation

To assess the efficacy of oral olaparib in patients with advanced cancer who have a confirmed genetic BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation, by assessment of tumour response

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
298

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Expanded Access

Expanded Access

A way for patients with serious diseases or conditions who cannot participate in a clinical trial to gain access to a medical product that has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Also called compassionate use. There are different expanded access types.
Approved

Approved

  • Available: Expanded access is currently available for this investigational treatment, and patients who are not participants in the clinical study may be able to gain access to the drug, biologic, or medical device being studied.
  • No longer available: Expanded access was available for this intervention previously but is not currently available and will not be available in the future.
  • Temporarily not available: Expanded access is not currently available for this intervention but is expected to be available in the future.
  • Approved for marketing: The intervention has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use by the public.
 for sale to the public. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Melbourne, Australia, 3000
        • Research Site
      • Randwick, Australia, 2031
        • Research Site
  • Germany
      • Köln, Germany, 50931
        • Research Site
  • Israel
      • Haifa, Israel, 31096
        • Research Site
      • Haifa, Israel, 35152
        • Research Site
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91031
        • Research Site
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91120
        • Research Site
      • Petah Tikva, Israel, 49100
        • Research Site
      • Ramat Gan, Israel, 52621
        • Research Site
      • Tel-Aviv, Israel
        • Research Site
  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain, 08035
        • Research Site
  • Sweden
      • Lund, Sweden, 221 85
        • Research Site
  • United States
    • California
      • West Hollywood, California, United States, 90048
        • Research Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 130 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed documented deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA mutation. (The presence of a loss-of-function germline mutation in the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 gene must be confirmed prior to consent according to local practice).
  • Confirmed malignant solid tumours for which no standard treatment exists
  • At least one lesion (measurable and/or non measurable) at baseline that can be accurately assessed by CT/MRI and is suitable for repeated assessment at follow up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any previous treatment with a PARP inhibitor, including olaparib
  • Patients unable to swallow orally administered medication and patients with gastrointestinal disorders likely to interfere with absorption of the study medication
  • Patients receiving any systematic chemotherapy, radiotherapy (except for palliative reasons) within 2 weeks from the last dose prior to study treatment (or a longer period depending on the defined characteristics of the agents used)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1
Olaparib is available as a film-coated tablet containing 150 mg or 100 mg of olaparib. Subjects will be administered study treatment orally at a dose recommended by Investigator. Full dose: 300 mg twice daily (bid) or Reduced doses: 200 mg twice daily (bid) or 100 mg twice daily (bid). The planned dose of 300 mg bid will be made up of two x 150 mg tablets twice daily, with 100 mg tablets used to manage dose reductions.
Drug: olaparib
Tablets Oral BID
Other Names:
  • Lynparza

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumour Response Rate
Time Frame: Tumour assessments carried out at baseline ie 28 days before first study drug dose and then every 8 weeks up to 6 months after starting study treatment, then every 12 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Tumour response rate is the proportion of patients who experienced complete or partial response at least once during the assessment period, according to the definitions of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1).
Tumour assessments carried out at baseline ie 28 days before first study drug dose and then every 8 weeks up to 6 months after starting study treatment, then every 12 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 29 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate
Time Frame: Tumour assessments carried out at baseline ie 28 days before first study drug dose and then every 8 weeks up to 6 months after starting study treatment, then every 12 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Objective response rate is the proportion of patients with at least one measurable lesion at baseline, who experienced complete or partial response at least once during the assessment period, according to the definitions of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1).
Tumour assessments carried out at baseline ie 28 days before first study drug dose and then every 8 weeks up to 6 months after starting study treatment, then every 12 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: Tumour assessments are carried out at baseline ie 28 days before first study drug dose and then every 8 weeks up to 6 months after starting study treatment, then every 12 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Progression free survival is defined as the duration from first dose till objective progression or death. In absence of progression or death, the time is calculated from first dose till last evaluable scanning visit.
Tumour assessments are carried out at baseline ie 28 days before first study drug dose and then every 8 weeks up to 6 months after starting study treatment, then every 12 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Survival follow-up from first dose till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Overall survival is defined as the duration from first dose till death. In absence of death, the time is calculated from first dose till the date subject last known to be alive.
Survival follow-up from first dose till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Overall Survival Rate at 12 Months
Time Frame: Survival follow-up from first dose till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Overall survival rate at 12 months is defined as the proportion of patients who are alive 12 months after date of first dose
Survival follow-up from first dose till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Duration of Response
Time Frame: From onset of first occurrence of complete or partial response till documented progression or death by any cause in the absence of progression, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Duration of response is calculated from the date of first documented response (complete or partial) until date of documented progression (as defined by RECIST 1.1) or death (by any cause) in the absence of disease progression.
From onset of first occurrence of complete or partial response till documented progression or death by any cause in the absence of progression, assessed maximum up to 29 months
Disease Control Rate at Week 16
Time Frame: Tumour assessments carried out at baseline ie 28 days before first study drug dose and then at week 8 and week 16
Disease control rate is the proportion of patients with best response of complete or partial response or stable disease according to definitions of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1) till week 16.
Tumour assessments carried out at baseline ie 28 days before first study drug dose and then at week 8 and week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Jane Robertson, BSc, MBCHB, MD, AstraZeneca
  • Principal Investigator: Bella Kaufman, MD, Chaim Sheba Medical Centre, Tel Hashomer, Israel

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 21, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 12, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 1, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 2, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D0810C00042
  • 2010-022278-15 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure

IPD Sharing Time Frame

AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the de-identified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings