Study of the Broad Clinical Benefit for Seroquel XR With Flexible Dose as an add-on Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Bipolar Mania Patients With Partial Response to Current Therapy (RELEASE)

April 11, 2012 updated by: AstraZeneca

A 4-week, Multi-Centre, Open-label, Non-comparative, Phase IV Study of the Broad Clinical Benefit for Seroquel XR (Quetiapine Fumarate Extended Release) With Flexible Dose as an add-on Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Bipolar Mania Patients With Partial Response to Current Therapy

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the broad clinical benefit of dosing Seroquel XR with flexible in the treatment of acute bipolar mania patients with partial response to existing therapy. Clinical benefit will be assessed with the Clinical Global Impression-Clinical Benefit (CGI-CB) score, according to a classification based on the principles outlined in the CGI efficacy index. Improvement in clinical benefit will be defined as a decrease from baseline in CGI-CB.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A 4-week, Multi-Centre, Open-label, Non-comparative, Phase IV Study of the Broad Clinical Benefit for Seroquel XR (Quetiapine Fumarate Extended Release) With Flexible Dose as an add-on Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Bipolar Mania Patients With Partial Response to Current Therapy

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
      • Gyungbook, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
      • Naju, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
    • Choongnam
      • Chunan, Choongnam, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
    • Chungcheongnam-do
      • CheonAn, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
    • Gangwondo
      • Chuncheon, Gangwondo, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
    • Gueonggido
      • Bucheon, Gueonggido, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
    • Gyeongsangbuk-do
      • Gyeongju, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
    • Seoul
      • Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented clinical diagnosis meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria (1. Bipolar I Disorder, manic or mixed type with/without psychotic feature, 2. Diagnosis should be confirmed by the Mini Inte)
  • Currently on Lithium/Valproate without antipsychotics more than 3 weeks consecutive treatment YMRS total score ≥16 at study entry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-response to antipsychotic treatments for manic symptoms in previous episodes
  • A patient with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) fulfilling one of the following criteria (1. Unstable DM defined as enrolment glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) >8.5%, 2. Admitted to hospital for treatment of DM or DM related illness in past 12 weeks, etc)
  • An absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 1.5 x 10^9 per liter

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Quetiapine XR
Quetiapine fumarate (Seroquel XR)
Drug: Quetiapine fumarate (Seroquel XR)
Extended Release(XR) 50 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg and/or 400 mg tablet, oral, once daily in the evening, from assignment to the end of the study.
Other Names:
  • Seroquel XR tablet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Proportion of Patients With Improvement From Baseline to Week 4 in Clinical Global Impression-Clinical Benefit Score (LOCF)
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4
CGI-CB is used to evaluate the investigator's global weighted impression of efficacy and interference of adverse event from baseline to every visit. Improvement in clinical benefit is defined as a decrease from baseline in CGI-CB. Rank 1 denotes best possible benefit from new treatment and rank 10 indicates that there is no benefit from treatment.
Baseline, week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in - YMRS (Young Mania Rating Scale) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4
The YMRS is an 11-item, multiple-choice diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure severity of manic episodes. There are 4 items graded on a 0 to 8 scale (irritability, speech, thought content, disruptive/aggressive behavior), and 7 items graded on 0 to 4 scale. These 4 items are given twice the weight of the others to compensate for poor cooperation from severely ill patients. Typical YMRS baseline scores can vary a lot. They depend on patients' clinical features such as mania (YMRS = 12), depression (YMRS = 3), or euthymia (YMRS = 2.
Baseline, week 4
The CGI-I (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement of Illness) Change From Baseline to Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4
The Global Improvement scale (CGI-I) is scored to rate the patient's change from baseline CGI. A CGI-I score of 1 indicates that a patient is "very much improved" and a score of 7 indicates that a patient is "very much worse." CGI-I scores greater than 4 indicate worsening, while scores less than 4 indicate improvement. At all following visits CGI-I will also be rated. The following calculations will be made: Proportion of patients with CGI Global Improvement rating ≤ 2 at Day 29
Baseline, week 4
The Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4
The CGI-S is scored to rate patient's current clinical state. At enrolment patient's condition is rated using the CGI-S. At assignment CGI-S is again completed and a score of at least 4 (moderately ill). The score at assignment Day 1 will be regarded as the baseline value. At all following visits CGI-S will be rated. Each CGI item is scored on a scale from 1 to 7. A CGI-S score of 1 indicates that a patient is "Normal, not at all ill" and a score of 7 indicates that a patient is "Among the most extremely ill patients".
Baseline, week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Joon Woo Bahn, AstraZeneca
  • Principal Investigator: Won-Myong Bahk, MD, St.Mary's hospital, The Catholic University of Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 21, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 17, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 11, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D1443L00080

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings