A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement: Results of a New Modular Trabecular Metal Tibial Component Using the NexGen System
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee
- Patients undergoing primary total knee replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age over 75 years old
- Prior unicondylar knee arthroplasty
- Grossly porotic bone or bone defects requiring bone grafting
- Bone cuts not sufficiently accurate for cementless fixation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Cemented fixation
Nexgen High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cemented Fixation
|
|
|
Other: Cementless fixation
Nexgen High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cementless Fixation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Radiographic analysis
Time Frame: 4 week
|
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
|
4 week
|
|
Radiographic analysis
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
|
1 year
|
|
Radiographic analysis
Time Frame: 2 year
|
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
|
2 year
|
|
Radiographic analysis
Time Frame: 5 year
|
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
|
5 year
|
|
Radiographic analysis
Time Frame: 10 year
|
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
|
10 year
|
|
Radiographic analysis
Time Frame: 15 year
|
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
|
15 year
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: Date of surgery
|
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
|
Date of surgery
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 4 week
|
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
|
4 week
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 4 month
|
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
|
4 month
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
|
1 year
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 2 year
|
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
|
2 year
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 5 year
|
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
|
5 year
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 10 year
|
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
|
10 year
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 15 year
|
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
|
15 year
|
|
Radiographic analysis
Time Frame: 4 month
|
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
|
4 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 4 week
|
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
|
4 week
|
|
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 1 year
|
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
|
1 year
|
|
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 2 year
|
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
|
2 year
|
|
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 5 year
|
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
|
5 year
|
|
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 10 year
|
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
|
10 year
|
|
Knee Society Score
Time Frame: 15 year
|
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
|
15 year
|
|
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: 4 week
|
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
|
4 week
|
|
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: 1 year
|
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
|
1 year
|
|
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: 2 year
|
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
|
2 year
|
|
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: 5 year
|
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
|
5 year
|
|
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: 10 year
|
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
|
10 year
|
|
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: 15 year
|
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
|
15 year
|
|
Visual analog pain score
Time Frame: 4 week
|
Pain score will be measured from a patient-assessed visual analog pain scale.
|
4 week
|
|
Visual analog pain score
Time Frame: 4 month
|
Pain score will be measured from a patient-assessed visual analog pain scale.
|
4 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kevin B Fricka, MD, Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AORI2010-0105
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.