Telmisartan 80mg Non-responder Trial

June 17, 2014 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

An Eight-week Randomised Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Telmisartan 80 mg+ Amlodipine 5 mg Fixed-dose Combination vs. Telmisartan 80 mg Monotherapy in Patients With Hypertension Who Fail to Respond Adequately to Treatment With Telmisartan 80 mg Monotherapy

If a patient cannot have his or her blood pressure controlled with telmisartan 80 mg, an antihypertensive drug from different class should be started concomitantly.

In the Japanese 3x3 factorial trial of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension patients whose diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are equal or more than 95 mmHg, the DBP control rate (less than 90 mmHg) after 8 weeks treatment of the telmisartan 80 mg monotherapy group (66 patients) was 41.5%. There should be medical needs of the telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 5 mg fixed dose combination because some patients cannot have his or her blood pressure controlled with telmisartan 80 mg.

Thus, this clinical trial is being conducted to evaluate the antihypertensive effect and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) drug of 2 antihypertensive agents with different pharmacological effects, telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 5 mg (T80/A5 mg), compared with telmisartan 80 mg (T80 mg) monotherapy in Japanese patients with essential hypertension who fail to respond adequately to treatment with the maximum dose of telmisartan 80 mg monotherapy. In this trial, a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel group comparison method is employed.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
174

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Chuo-ku,Tokyo, Japan
        • 1235.36.01 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
        • 1235.36.04 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • 1235.36.02 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Suita, Osaka, Japan
        • 1235.36.03 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Essential hypertensive patients

    • If already taking antihypertensive drugs, mean seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) must be >=90 and >=114 mmHg
    • If not taking any antihypertensive drugs, mean seated DBP must be >=95 and >=114 mmHg
  • Able to stop all current antihypertensive drugs without risk to the patient based on the investigators opinion.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients taking 3 or more antihypertensive drugs at signing the informed consent form
  • Patients with known or suspected secondary hypertension
  • Patients with clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmia
  • Congestive heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV
  • Patients with recent cardiovascular events
  • Patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack within last 6 months before signing the informed consent form
  • Patients with a history of sudden deterioration of renal function with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors; or patients with post-renal transplant or post-nephrectomy
  • Patients who have previously experienced characteristic symptoms of angioedema (such as facial, tongue, pharyngeal, or laryngeal swelling with dyspnea) during treatment with ARBs or ACE inhibitors
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational product, or a known hypersensitivity to dihydropyridine-derived drugs
  • Patients with hepatic and/or renal dysfunction
  • Pre-menopausal women who are nursing or pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Telmisartan and amlodipine FDC
once a daily
Drug: Telmisartan and amlodipine
Telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 5 mg once a daily
Active Comparator: Telmisartan monotherapy
once a daily
Drug: Telmisartan
80 mg once a daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction From the Reference Baseline in Mean Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Trough
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Reference baseline: Status of patients after the 8-week open-label run-in period with telmisartan monotherapy, where patients' eligibility to enter the double-blind treatment period was examined At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
Baseline, 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction From the Reference Baseline in Mean Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Trough
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Reference baseline: Status of patients after the 8-week open-label run-in period with telmisartan monotherapy, where patients' eligibility to enter the double-blind treatment period was examined At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
Baseline, 8 weeks
Seated DBP Control Rate at Trough
Time Frame: 8 weeks
DBP control rate: The rate of patients with controlled seated DBP at trough of less than 90 mmHg after the 8-week double-blind period At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
8 weeks
Seated SBP Control Rate at Trough
Time Frame: 8 weeks
SBP control rate: The rate of patients with controlled seated SBP at trough of less than 140 mmHg after the 8-week double-blind period At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
8 weeks
Seated DBP Response Rate at Trough
Time Frame: 8 weeks
DBP response rate: The rate of patients who achieved an adequate response in seated DBP at trough (<90 mmHg and/or reduction from reference baseline ≥10 mmHg) after the 8-week double-blind period At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
8 weeks
Seated SBP Response Rate at Trough
Time Frame: 8 weeks
SBP response rate: The rate of patients who achieved an adequate response in seated SBP at trough (<140 mmHg and/or reduction from reference baseline ≥20 mmHg) after the 8-week double-blind period At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
8 weeks
Seated Blood Pressure (BP) Normalisation at Trough
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Seated blood pressure (BP) normalisation: The numbers of patients whose blood pressure was within normalisation criterion in terms of seated blood pressure after the 8-week double-blind period At trough: 24-hour post-dosing
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boehringer Ingelheim

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 18, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 27, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1235.36

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings