IGF-1 Inhibitor Pasireotide Lar in Combination With the m-TOR Inhibitor Everolimus

January 8, 2013 updated by: Giampaolo Talamo, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Phase II Study of the IGF-1 Inhibitor Pasireotide Lar in Combination With the m-TOR Inhibitor Everolimus in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Observe the safety/tolerability and effectiveness in terms of response rate and duration of response of the combination pasireotide + everolimus in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple melanoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy of plasma cells. It represents the second most common hematological malignancy, with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma being the most common.In this protocol, we propose a regimen consisting of a novel combination of two agents with a promising preclinical activity, i.e., pasireotide (IGF-1 inhibitor) and everolimus (mTOR inhibitor), exploring the efficacy of this therapy in patients with MM. We propose enrollment after failure to the first two lines of FDA-approved agents, even in patients who did not have high-dose chemotherapy and SCT. In fact, overall survival after SCT has been shown to be identical when "early" SCT is compared to "late" SCT, i.e., administered at the time of relapse. This provides an important opportunity to test our novel therapeutic approach, reserving SCT for relapse. The advantage of the this strategy is that similar overall survival outcomes can be achieved with fewer patients undergoing SCT. Both everolimus and pasireotide have the potential of being clinically effective against myeloma. A phase II trial of the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus, an analogue of everolimus, produced a response rate of 38% in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The IGF-1 inhibitor pasireotide is a promising agent, because IGF has been recently found to be one of the most important growth signal molecule in myeloma cells. The combination of everolimus and pasireotide should have a synergistic antimyeloma effect because preclinical data invitro have shown that combined inhibition of mTOR inhibition and IGF-1 led to a synergistic increase of cell growth inhibition in multiple myeloma cells and might represent a potential new treatment strategy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically documented multiple myeloma
  • Multiple myeloma relapsing or refractory to at least 2 of the currently accepted therapies for multiple myeloma
  • Age > 18 years
  • Minimum of 4 weeks since any major surgery, radiation or 5 half life since prior systemic anticancer therapy
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 2
  • Anticipated life expectancy of 12 weeks or more
  • Adequate bone marrow function
  • Adequate liver function
  • Calculated creatinine
  • INR ≤ 1.5
  • Fasting serum cholesterol ≤ 300 mg/dL or ≤ 7.75 mmol/L and fasting triglycerides ≤ 2.5 x ULN
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test. Women must not be lactating. Both men and women of childbearing potential must be advised of the importance of using effective birth control during the course of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients should not receive immunization with attenuated live vaccines within one week of study entry or during study period.
  • Patients should not receive immunization with attenuated live vaccines during study period or within 1 week of study entry.
  • Patients with prior or concurrent malignancy
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Patients who have congestive heart failure, unstable angina, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, clinically significant bradycardia, advanced heart block or history of acute myocardial infarction within the 6 months preceding enrollment.
  • Liver disease
  • Patients who have any severe and/or uncontrolled medical condition or other conditions that could affect their participation in the study.
  • Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding, adults of reproductive potential who are not using effective birth control methods.
  • Male patients whose sexual partner(s) are women of child bering potential and who are not willing to use adequate contraception during the study and for 8 weeks after the end of treatment.
  • Patients with a known hypersensitivity to everolimus or other rapamycin or to its excipients.
  • Known hypersensitivity to somatostatin analogues or any component of the pasireotide or octreotide LAR formulations
  • History of noncompliance to medical regimens
  • Patients unwilling to or unable to comply with the protocol
  • Patients taking medication know to inhibit, induce or be a substrate to isoenzyme CYP3A
  • QTcF at screening > 450 msec, history of syncope or family history of idiopathic sudden death, sustained or clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias, risk factors for Torsades de points, concomitant disease that could prolong QT intervals, use of concomitant medications know to prolong the QT interval.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Pasireotide
Pasireotide 60 mg day 1 every 28 days
Drug: Pasireotide
Given as an intramuscular injection on day 1 every 28 days, 60 mg per dose
Other Names:
  • SOM230
  • Pasireotide LAR
  • Pasireotide s.c.
Drug: Everolimus
given as an oral tablet every day on days 1-28, 10 mg per day
Other Names:
  • RAD001

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary objective
Time Frame: 12 patients enrolled
Initially 12 patients will be enrolled. If there are no responses among these patients with the combination pasireotide + everolimus in the treatment the study will be terminated.
12 patients enrolled

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary objective
Time Frame: 25 to 37 patients enrolled
After initial 12 patients enrolled and these patients respond, an additional 25 to 27 patients will be enrolled. We will evaluate efficacy of the combination regimen based primarily on response rate. Progression free-survival and overall survival will also be recorded and analyzed.
25 to 37 patients enrolled

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Giampaolo Talamo, MD, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2012

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 24, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 4, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 10, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 8, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PSHCI 09-095

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings