AG200-15 Transdermal Contraceptive Delivery System (TCDS) of Levonorgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol

December 21, 2017 updated by: Agile Therapeutics

An Open-Label Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetic Profile of Agile TCDS AG200-15 and to Compare Exposure to Ethinyl Estradiol to Oral Contraceptive (Orthocyclen®) in Healthy Female Volunteers

Pharmacokinetics and safety of AG200-15 over two consecutive cycles of therapy will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an open-label study comprised of two parts. Part I is a single-arm, run-in cycle with AG200-15 administered to all subjects as a 21-7 day regimen (three consecutive weeks of patch wear followed by a patch-free week).

Part II employs crossover design with subjects randomly assigned to one of the two treatment sequences. Each sequence will include AG200-15 and oral contraceptive (Ortho-Cyclen®) as described below: Sequence 1: AG200-15 (Period 1) followed by oral contraceptive, Ortho-Cyclen® (Period 2); Sequence 2: Oral contraceptive, Ortho-Cyclen® (Period 1) followed by AG200-15 (Period 2) Both AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® will be administered as 21-7 day regimen (three consecutive weeks of drug-taking followed by a drug-free week). Duration of each treatment Period is 28 days (one cycle of therapy).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy women, ages 18-45
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥18 and ≤32, and weight ≥ 110 lbs.
  • Willing to use a non-hormonal method of contraception if at risk of pregnancy, OR have already undergone previous bilateral tubal ligation or hysterectomy
  • Willing to refrain from use of alcohol and grapefruit juice from 48 hours prior until completion of each treatment period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected pregnancy;
  • Lactating women
  • Significant skin reaction to transdermal preparations or sensitivity to surgical / medical tape
  • Any disease that may worsen under hormonal treatment (cardiovascular, liver, metabolic)
  • Use of other contraceptive methods than study medication
  • Smokers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Ortho-Cyclen®
Ortho-Cyclen® is a comparator drug intervention
Drug: Ortho-Cyclen
Ortho-Cyclen is an oral contraceptive containing 35 µg of EE and 250 µg of norgestimate (NGM) in a 21 - 7 day regimen.
Other Names:
  • oral contraceptive
Experimental: AG200-15
AG200-15 is an investigational transdermal contraceptive delivery system that is a drug intervention
Drug: AG200-15
AG200-15 is a transdermal contraceptive delivery system delivering 100 - 120 mcg of LNG and 25 - 30 mcg EE
Other Names:
  • transdermal contraception

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparative Evaluation of Ethinyl Estradiol (EE) Cmax Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of ethinyl estradiol (EE) Cmax between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycle 2 and 3.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Cmax Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Cmax between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 3 for cycles 2 and 3.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE AUC(0-168hrs Post-first Dose) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE AUC (0-168hrs post-first dose) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycles 2 and 3.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE AUC (0-168hrs Post-first Dose) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE AUC (0-168hrs post-first dose) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 3 for cycles 2 and 3.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (1) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (1) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For AG200-15 the average concentration within the 48-168 h time-interval was measured.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (1) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (1) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 3 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For AG200-15 the average concentration within the 48-168 h time-interval was measured.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (2) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (2) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For Ag200-15, the average concentration at steady-state calculated from trapezoidal AUC within the 48-168h time interval (AUC/time interval).
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (2) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (2) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 3 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For Ag200-15, the average concentration at steady-state calculated from trapezoidal AUC within the 48-168h time interval (AUC/time interval).
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (3) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (3) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For AG200-15, the average concentration at steady-state calculated from trapezoidal AUC within the 0-168h time interval (AUC/time interval).
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (3) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (3) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 3 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For AG200-15, the average concentration at steady-state calculated from trapezoidal AUC within the 0-168h time interval (AUC/time interval).
3 months
Evaluation of LNG Cmax Between AG200-15 in Week 1 and 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluation of LNG Cmax Between AG200-15 in Week 1 and 3 for cycles 2 and 3.
3 months
Evaluation of LNG AUC (0-168hrs Post-first Dose) Between AG200-15 in Week 1 and 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluation of LNG AUC (0-168hrs post-first dose) Between AG200-15 in Week 1 and 3 for cycles 2 and 3.
3 months
Evaluation of LNG Css (1) Between AG200-15 in Week 1 and 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (1) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen, steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For Ag200-15, the average concentration at steady-state calculated from trapezoidal AUC within the 48-168h time interval (AUC/time interval).
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Agile Therapeutics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 16, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 18, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 21, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ATI-CL14

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings