AG200-15 Transdermal Contraceptive Delivery System (TCDS) of Levonorgestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol

December 21, 2017 updated by: Agile Therapeutics

An Open-Label Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetic Profile of Agile TCDS AG200-15 and to Compare Exposure to Ethinyl Estradiol to Oral Contraceptive (Orthocyclen®) in Healthy Female Volunteers

Pharmacokinetics and safety of AG200-15 over two consecutive cycles of therapy will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is an open-label study comprised of two parts. Part I is a single-arm, run-in cycle with AG200-15 administered to all subjects as a 21-7 day regimen (three consecutive weeks of patch wear followed by a patch-free week).

Part II employs crossover design with subjects randomly assigned to one of the two treatment sequences. Each sequence will include AG200-15 and oral contraceptive (Ortho-Cyclen®) as described below: Sequence 1: AG200-15 (Period 1) followed by oral contraceptive, Ortho-Cyclen® (Period 2); Sequence 2: Oral contraceptive, Ortho-Cyclen® (Period 1) followed by AG200-15 (Period 2) Both AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® will be administered as 21-7 day regimen (three consecutive weeks of drug-taking followed by a drug-free week). Duration of each treatment Period is 28 days (one cycle of therapy).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy women, ages 18-45
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥18 and ≤32, and weight ≥ 110 lbs.
  • Willing to use a non-hormonal method of contraception if at risk of pregnancy, OR have already undergone previous bilateral tubal ligation or hysterectomy
  • Willing to refrain from use of alcohol and grapefruit juice from 48 hours prior until completion of each treatment period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected pregnancy;
  • Lactating women
  • Significant skin reaction to transdermal preparations or sensitivity to surgical / medical tape
  • Any disease that may worsen under hormonal treatment (cardiovascular, liver, metabolic)
  • Use of other contraceptive methods than study medication
  • Smokers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ortho-Cyclen®
Ortho-Cyclen® is a comparator drug intervention
Ortho-Cyclen is an oral contraceptive containing 35 µg of EE and 250 µg of norgestimate (NGM) in a 21 - 7 day regimen.
Other Names:
  • oral contraceptive
Experimental: AG200-15
AG200-15 is an investigational transdermal contraceptive delivery system that is a drug intervention
AG200-15 is a transdermal contraceptive delivery system delivering 100 - 120 mcg of LNG and 25 - 30 mcg EE
Other Names:
  • transdermal contraception

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparative Evaluation of Ethinyl Estradiol (EE) Cmax Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of ethinyl estradiol (EE) Cmax between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycle 2 and 3.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Cmax Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Cmax between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 3 for cycles 2 and 3.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE AUC(0-168hrs Post-first Dose) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE AUC (0-168hrs post-first dose) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycles 2 and 3.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE AUC (0-168hrs Post-first Dose) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE AUC (0-168hrs post-first dose) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 3 for cycles 2 and 3.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (1) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (1) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For AG200-15 the average concentration within the 48-168 h time-interval was measured.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (1) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (1) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 3 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For AG200-15 the average concentration within the 48-168 h time-interval was measured.
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (2) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (2) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For Ag200-15, the average concentration at steady-state calculated from trapezoidal AUC within the 48-168h time interval (AUC/time interval).
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (2) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (2) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 3 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For Ag200-15, the average concentration at steady-state calculated from trapezoidal AUC within the 48-168h time interval (AUC/time interval).
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (3) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (3) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For AG200-15, the average concentration at steady-state calculated from trapezoidal AUC within the 0-168h time interval (AUC/time interval).
3 months
Comparative Evaluation of EE Css (3) Between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in Week 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (3) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 3 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For AG200-15, the average concentration at steady-state calculated from trapezoidal AUC within the 0-168h time interval (AUC/time interval).
3 months
Evaluation of LNG Cmax Between AG200-15 in Week 1 and 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluation of LNG Cmax Between AG200-15 in Week 1 and 3 for cycles 2 and 3.
3 months
Evaluation of LNG AUC (0-168hrs Post-first Dose) Between AG200-15 in Week 1 and 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluation of LNG AUC (0-168hrs post-first dose) Between AG200-15 in Week 1 and 3 for cycles 2 and 3.
3 months
Evaluation of LNG Css (1) Between AG200-15 in Week 1 and 3
Time Frame: 3 months
Comparative evaluation of EE Css (1) between AG200-15 and Ortho-Cyclen® in week 1 for cycles 2 and 3. For Ortho-Cyclen, steady-state concentration calculated as average concentration at steady-state from the 24-hour trapezoidal AUC (AUC0-24h/24). For Ag200-15, the average concentration at steady-state calculated from trapezoidal AUC within the 48-168h time interval (AUC/time interval).
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Ortho-Cyclen

Subscribe