SMS Reminder to Assess Adherence

January 17, 2013 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Assessment if a Daily SMS (Short Message System) Reminder Improves the Adherence of COPD Patients to Therapy With Spiriva® 18 Microgram

6 months open label non-interventional observational study acc to § 4, section 23 and § 67, section 6 German Medicines Act with two parallel groups

  1. the SMS group receiving a daily SMS - a reminder to inhale Spiriva® 18 Microgram
  2. the control group not receiving a daily SMS reminder

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Purpose:

Study Design:

observational

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
95

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
      • Cottbus, Germany
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
      • Koblenz, Germany
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 4
      • Lübeck, Germany
        • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 5

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients requiring long-acting bronchodilators according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and guidelines
  • User of mobile phone

Exclusion criteria:

- Patients presenting with the general and specific contraindications listed in the Patient Information Leaflet and the SPC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
control group
Procedure: control group
no daily SMS to remind of treatment with tiotropium
SMS group
Procedure: SMS reminder
daily SMS in the SMS group to remind of treatment with tiotropium

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to Spiriva HandiHaler Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24
Adherence was defined as percentage of documented applications of Spiriva HandiHaler as compared to the regularly planned seven applications during the week before questioning the patients. Patients in the SMS reminder group and in the control group were asked via SMS how often they had used Spiriva HandiHaler during the last week and were requested to call the IVR system to provide their response. Baseline was defined as week 4.
Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Adherence to Spiriva HandiHaler Over Time
Time Frame: Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24
Adherence was defined as percentage of documented applications of Spiriva HandiHaler as compared to the regularly planned seven applications during the week before questioning the patients. Patients in the SMS reminder group and in the control group were asked via SMS how often they had used Spiriva HandiHaler during the last week and were requested to call the IVR system to provide their response. Baseline was defined as week 4.
Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24
Response Rate Regarding Adherence
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Adherence was dichotomised into yes and no at the end of study depending on whether the percentage of adherence was at least 80 percent or less than 80 percent, respectively. Patients who did not respond to the SMS/ IVR system to provide information about the actual number of inhalations were considered with 0 percent adherence.
24 weeks
Patients Compliance With SMS System
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Compliance was defined as the percentage of patients answers to the IVR system as compared to the number of SMS automatically sent to the patients by the SMS/ IVR system asking for the number of Spiriva HandiHaler applications.
24 weeks
Patients Assessment of Usefulness of the SMS System
Time Frame: Visit 2 (12 weeks) and visit 3 (24 weeks)
Only patients in the SMS reminder group were asked to assess the usefulness of the SMS system by the categories very helpful, helpful and not helpful.
Visit 2 (12 weeks) and visit 3 (24 weeks)
Physicians Assessment of Usefulness of the SMS System
Time Frame: Visit 2 (12 weeks) and visit 3 (24 weeks)
Only physicians of patients in the SMS reminder group were asked to assess the usefulness of the SMS system by the categories very helpful, helpful and not helpful.
Visit 2 (12 weeks) and visit 3 (24 weeks)
Physicians Recommendation of the SMS System
Time Frame: Visit 2 (12 weeks) and visit 3 (24 weeks)
Only physicians of patients in the SMS reminder group were asked if they would recommend the SMS system (no, yes, don't know)
Visit 2 (12 weeks) and visit 3 (24 weeks)
Patients Satisfaction With SMS System
Time Frame: Visit 2 (12 weeks) and visit 3 (24 weeks)
Only patients in the SMS group were asked to assess their satisfaction with the SMS system by assigning German school grades 1=very good, 2=good, 3=satisfactory, 4=sufficient, 5=deficient, 6=insufficient.
Visit 2 (12 weeks) and visit 3 (24 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boehringer Ingelheim

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 18, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 17, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 205.474

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings