Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of rhuMAb Beta7 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

August 10, 2016 updated by: Genentech, Inc.

Phase II Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of rhuMAb Beta7 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

This Phase II study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rhuMAb Beta7 in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
124

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • Australian Capital Territory
      • Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia, 2605
    • Victoria
      • Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
      • Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia, 3065
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3181
      • Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3050
  • Belgium
      • Bonheiden, Belgium, 2820
      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
      • Liège, Belgium, 4000
  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2X8
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
      • Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada, L4L 4Y7
  • Czech Republic
      • Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, 500 12
      • Nachod, Czech Republic, 547 01
      • Ostrava - Poruba, Czech Republic, 708 52
      • Zlin, Czech Republic, 762 75
  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
      • Minden, Germany, 32423
      • Ulm, Germany, 89081
  • Hungary
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1136
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1073
      • Gyor, Hungary, 9024
      • Gyöngyös, Hungary, 3200
      • Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary, 9200
  • Israel
      • Beer Sheva, Israel, 84105
      • Haifa, Israel, 31096
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91031
      • Ramat Gan, Israel, 52621
      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 64239
  • New Zealand
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1023
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1640
      • Christchurch, New Zealand, 8011
      • Dunedin, New Zealand, 9054
      • Takapuna, New Zealand, 0620
  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08003
  • United Kingdom
      • Harrow, United Kingdom, HA1 3UJ
      • London, United Kingdom, SW10 9NH
      • London, United Kingdom, N6A 4L6
      • Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 4LP
  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
    • Maryland
      • Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-0682
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
    • New York
      • Great Neck, New York, United States, 11021
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis outpatient
  • Disease duration at time of screening of >/= 12 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Extensive colonic resection or subtotal or total colectomy
  • Presence of an ileostomy or colostomy
  • Moderate to severe anemia
  • A history or evidence of colonic mucosal dysplasia
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Significant uncontrolled co-morbidity, such as neurological, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrine, or gastrointestinal (GI) disorders
  • Significant screening ECG abnormalities, including evidence of acute myocardial infarction, complete left bundle branch block, second-degree heart block, or complete heart block
  • Poorly controlled diabetes
  • Impaired renal function
  • Impaired hepatic function in the absence of a diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis
  • Positive tests for antibodies indicating active or prior infection with HIV or hepatitis B (HBV) or C (HCV)
  • Positive screening test for latent mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) infection
  • Demyelinating disease
  • Received any investigational treatment within 12 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment
  • Previous exposure to rhuMAb Beta7

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: placebo
Drug: placebo
Repeating subcutaneous injection
EXPERIMENTAL: rhuMAb Beta7
Drug: rhuMAb Beta7
Repeating subcutaneous injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical remission defined as a Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) </= 2 with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point
Time Frame: Week 10
Week 10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical response as defined by at least a 3-point decrease and 30% reduction from baseline in MCS and a >/=1-point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1
Time Frame: Week 6 and Week 10
Week 6 and Week 10
Clinical remission defined by a MCS </= 2 with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Proportion of patients with endoscopic score and rectal bleeding score of 0
Time Frame: Week 6 and Week 10
Week 6 and Week 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Genentech, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Sharon O'Byrne, M.D., Genentech, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 14, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 18, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 10, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ABS4986g
  • GP27778 (OTHER: Hoffmann-La Roche)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcerative Colitis

Clinical Trials on placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings