Conventional Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Tinnitus Treatment (MagTIN)

December 13, 2025 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Assessment of Conventional Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Tinnitus

The objective of the investigators study is to assess conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with chronic severe tinnitus. A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled procedure, with four increasing levels of magnetic "pseudo-dose" has been designed, in order to characterize the effectiveness of rTMS while controlling its safety and tolerability. By combining various rTMS protocols with a twelve-month follow-up, and using an effect modeling, the study aims at: (i) specify the effective values of rTMS parameters, with an adequate tolerance; (ii) determine the expected benefit and the persistence of effect; (iii) assess the practical feasibility of this kind of therapeutic management.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
64

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Lyon, France, 69437
        • Département d'ORL et de Chirurgie Cervico-Maxillo-Faciale, Hôpital Edouard Herriot
      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69495
        • Service d'Audiologie et Explorations Orofaciales, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69495
        • Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women between the ages of 18 and 75 years old;
  • Adequate medical condition (ASA P1 or P2 in Physical Status Classification System);
  • Disabling tinnitus (STSS > 8/16 or THQ > 50%), with the following characteristics: continuous, subjective, non-pulsatile; unilateral (or bilateral with unilateral predominance), chronic (duration for at least one year), refractory for usual treatments taken for at least six months;
  • Naive regarding TMS;
  • Able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Objective tinnitus or tinnitus with treatable cause;
  • Presence of intracranial or intraocular ferromagnetic materiel or particles (with the exception of dental fillings and MRI-compatible stapedectomy prosthesis);
  • Cardiac pacemaker or other electronic implants (including cochlear implant);
  • Serious heart disease or other unstable major medical condition;
  • Personal history of central nervous system disorder, head injury, stroke or seizures (including childhood febrile seizures);
  • Familial history of epilepsy;
  • Concomitant medication with antidepressants and antipsychotics;
  • Possibility of pregnancy;
  • Known claustrophobia;
  • Others known contraindications to rTMS or brain MRI;
  • Refusal to be informed about the results of anatomical MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Active rTMS

48 subjects will receive active temporal rTMS, applied with the following combined parameters:

  • intensity: 100% of resting motor threshold
  • stimulation frequency: low-frequency continuous stimulation (0.5 or 1 Hz) or high-frequency stimulation trains (4 or 12 Hz)
  • number of stimulations per session: 300, 900 or 1800 per session
  • number of sessions per week: spaced out / low density protocol (1 per week) or dense / high density protocol (5 per week)
  • total number of sessions for the whole intervention: short protocol (5 sessions) or long protocol (20 sessions).
Device: transcranial magnetic stimulator (class 2b) Medtronic © MagPro X100 (with MagOption) stimulator and Butterfly Coil MCF-B65 (figure-8 coil with fluid cooling)
The study is based on a dual procedure consisting of comparisons between active and sham rTMS on the one hand and between four increasing levels of magnetic "pseudo-dose" on the other hand. Each level comprises 16 patients randomly assigned to active rTMS group (12 patients) or sham rTMS group (4 patients). The transition from one level to another is authorized by an independent oversight committee charged with checking the tolerability of rTMS sessions for the tested level. The neuronavigated rTMS use either active or sham figure-eight coil and is centered over the primary auditory cortex contralateral to the perceived predominant side of tinnitus. This target is located through anatomical brain MRI and neuronavigated brain system. According to the stimulation parameters, each rTMS session can last from 5 to 112 minutes and the whole rTMS intervention from 1 to 20 weeks. The follow-up is spread over twelve months.
Other Names:
  • Medtronic © MagPro X100 (with MagOption) stimulator and Butterfly Coil MCF-B65 (figure-8 coil with fluid cooling)
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS
16 subjects will receive sham rTMS, applied with the same combination of parameters as active rTMS, except for the number of stimulations per session (300 or 900)
Device: Sham transcranial magnetic stimulator Medtronic © MagPro X100 (shielded figure-8 coil with fluid cooling)
Same sound level as active rTMS, but magnetic field strongly attenuated
Other Names:
  • Medtronic © MagPro X100 (with MagOption) stimulator and Placebo Butterfly Coil MCF-P-B65 (shielded figure-8 coil with fluid cooling)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in tinnitus perception, as measured over time using a visual analog rating scale (subjective loudness of tinnitus)
Time Frame: At subject enrollment; daily for 2 weeks before the intervention; before and after each rTMS session, once at the end of each week and at the end of intervention; during follow-up: twice a week for 6 months, and 1 year after the end of intervention
The time between enrollment and rTMS intervention will vary from one subject to another (expected average of 4 months); depending on the protocol, the end of the intervention corresponds to the end of week 1, 4, 5 or 20 (first day of rTMS as reference)
At subject enrollment; daily for 2 weeks before the intervention; before and after each rTMS session, once at the end of each week and at the end of intervention; during follow-up: twice a week for 6 months, and 1 year after the end of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tolerance of rTMS, evaluated through a semi-structured interview on specific and nonspecific adverse events
Time Frame: After the first rTMS session; before and after each following session and at the end of intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
Depending on the protocol, the end of the intervention corresponds to the end of week 1, 4, 5 or 20 (first day of rTMS as reference)
After the first rTMS session; before and after each following session and at the end of intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
Auditory status, evaluated through tonal audiometry (pure-tone average)
Time Frame: At subject enrollment; before the first rTMS session and after the last rTMS session (for all types of protocols), and every five sessions of rTMS (for long protocols)
The time between enrollment and rTMS intervention will vary from one subject to another (expected average of 4 months)
At subject enrollment; before the first rTMS session and after the last rTMS session (for all types of protocols), and every five sessions of rTMS (for long protocols)
Change in severity of tinnitus, measured through a multidimensional self-questionnaire: Subjective Tinnitus Severity Scale (STSS)
Time Frame: At subject enrollment; before the first rTMS session, in the middle and at the end of intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
Depending on the protocol, middle (respectively, end) of the intervention corresponds to day 3, day 12, beginning of week 3 or beginning of week 11 (respectively, end of week 1, 4, 5 or 20), with the first day of rTMS as reference
At subject enrollment; before the first rTMS session, in the middle and at the end of intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
Change in handicap related to tinnitus, measured through a multidimensional self-questionnaire: Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ)
Time Frame: At subject enrollment; at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of rTMS intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
At subject enrollment; at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of rTMS intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
Change in hyperacusis, measured through a multidimensional self-questionnaire: Auditory Hypersensitivity Questionnaire
Time Frame: At subject enrollment; at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of rTMS intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
At subject enrollment; at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of rTMS intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
Change in anxiety and depression, measured through a two-dimensional self-questionnaire: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: At subject enrollment; at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of rTMS intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
At subject enrollment; at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of rTMS intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
Personality, assessed through a multidimensional self-questionnaire: Mini-Mult (short form of the MMPI)
Time Frame: At subject enrollment
The time between enrollment and rTMS intervention will vary from one subject to another (expected average of 4 months)
At subject enrollment
Change in tinnitus spectrum (loudness and pitch), characterized through psychoacoustical measurements: tinnitometry
Time Frame: At subject enrollment; at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of rTMS intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
At subject enrollment; at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of rTMS intervention period; 1, 4 or 5, and 20 weeks after the start of intervention; 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the end of intervention
Motivation level, assessed through a short self-questionnaire (Likert-type scale)
Time Frame: At the beginning of intervention period (before the first rTMS session) (day 1)
At the beginning of intervention period (before the first rTMS session) (day 1)
Satisfaction degree, assessed through a short self-questionnaire (Likert-type scale) Time Frame: At the end of SMTr intervention
Time Frame: At the end of intervention period (end of week 1, 4, 5 or 20, with the first day of rTMS as reference)
At the end of intervention period (end of week 1, 4, 5 or 20, with the first day of rTMS as reference)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospices Civils de Lyon

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Xavier PERROT, MD, PhD, Service d'Audiologie et Explorations Orofaciales (Pr. COLLET) - Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud - Hospices Civils de Lyon

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 1, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 2, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 13, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2004.365

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings