Peanuts Second Meal Glycemic Response

August 8, 2011 updated by: Federal University of Vicosa

Acute and Second Meal Effects of Peanuts on Glycemic Response and Appetite in Obese Women With High Type 2 Diabetes Risk: a Randomized Crossover Trial

Nut consumption is associated with reduced risk of Type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of peanut (whole or peanut butter) to breakfast meals on glycemic, insulinemic and selected gut hormone responses, appetite, and food intake over two consecutive meals in obese women with high Type 2 diabetes risk. Fifteen women participated in a randomized crossover trial where 42.5g of whole peanuts (P), peanut butter (PB), or no peanuts (control-C) were added to a 75g available carbohydrate-matched breakfast meal. Postprandial concentrations of blood glucose, insulin, non-esterified free fatty acids (NEFA), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), peptide YY (PYY), cholecystokinin (CCK), appetitive sensations and food intake were assessed after breakfast treatments and a standard lunch (75g available carbohydrate).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Minas Gerais
      • Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 36570-000
        • Federal University of Vicosa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index between 30 - 35 kg/M2
  • Not taking medications known to affect glycemia, fat metabolism, or appetite
  • Regular breakfast consumer (≥100 kilocalories ingested within 2 hours of waking on ≥4d/wk)
  • No body weight fluctuation (<5kg in the past 3 months)
  • Willingness to eat all test foods
  • No self-reported allergy to the foods provided in the study
  • No self-reported sleep disorders
  • At least one of the following conditions: waist circumference ≥ 88 cm; reported family history of Type 2 diabetes in first degree relatives; capillary glycemia between 5.5 - 7.0 mmol/L; and/or a 2-hour blood glucose of 7.8 - 11.1 mmol/L (impaired glucose tolerance)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Dyslipidemia
  • High blood pressure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Peanut butter
42.5 g of Peanuts butter were added to a 75g available carbohydrate-matched breakfast meal
Dietary supplement: Whole peanuts without skins, Peanut butter, or no peanuts (control)
In accordance with the Food and Drug Administration qualified health claim regarding daily nut intake, 42.5 g of whole peanuts or peanut butter were added to a 75g available carbohydrate-matched breakfast meal each test session.
Experimental: Whole peanut
42.5 g of whole peanuts were added to a 75g available carbohydrate-matched breakfast meal
Dietary supplement: Whole peanuts without skins, Peanut butter, or no peanuts (control)
In accordance with the Food and Drug Administration qualified health claim regarding daily nut intake, 42.5 g of whole peanuts or peanut butter were added to a 75g available carbohydrate-matched breakfast meal each test session.
No Intervention: No peanuts (control)
Dietary supplement: Whole peanuts without skins, Peanut butter, or no peanuts (control)
In accordance with the Food and Drug Administration qualified health claim regarding daily nut intake, 42.5 g of whole peanuts or peanut butter were added to a 75g available carbohydrate-matched breakfast meal each test session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in glucose homeostasis at eight hours
Time Frame: Baseline (-10), 15, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 265, 295, 310, 340, 370, 430 and 490 minutes
Postprandial concentrations and incremental area under the curve of blood glucose, insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1, and incremental area above the curve of non-esterified free fatty acids were assessed after breakfast treatments and a standard lunch
Baseline (-10), 15, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 265, 295, 310, 340, 370, 430 and 490 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in incretin hormones at four hours
Time Frame: Baseline (-10), 15, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 240 minutes
Postprandial concentrations and the incremental area under the curve of peptide YY and cholecystokinin were assessed after breakfast treatments
Baseline (-10), 15, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 240 minutes
Change in food intake over 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours
All food consumed in laboratory and after leaving the laboratory in the experiment day were recorded
24 hours
Change from baseline in appetitive sensations at twelve hours
Time Frame: Baseline (-10), 15, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 265, 295, 310, 340, 370, 430, 490, 550, 610, 670 and 730 minutes
Appetite ratings were scored at baseline and in a pre-determined times on a 100 mm visual analogue scale anchored with descriptors of "not at all" and "extremely"
Baseline (-10), 15, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 265, 295, 310, 340, 370, 430, 490, 550, 610, 670 and 730 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Federal University of Vicosa

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do estado de Minas Gerais

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Caio EG Reis, PhD Student, University of Brasília, Brazil
  • Study Chair: Daniela N Ribeiro, M.Sc., Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil
  • Study Chair: Neuza MB Costa, Ph.D., Federal University of Espírito Santo, Brazil
  • Study Chair: Josefina Bressan, Ph.D., Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil
  • Principal Investigator: Rita CG Alfenas, Ph.D., Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil
  • Study Director: Richard D Mattes, Ph.D., Purdue University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 8, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 10, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 10, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 8, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NUTBRA

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings