Autopsy Follow-up of Subjects Previously Imaged With Florbetapir F 18 (18F-AV-45) PET in Trial 18F-AV-45-A07

March 7, 2025 updated by: Avid Radiopharmaceuticals

This study is designed to test the relationship between measurements of brain amyloid using florbetapir F 18 PET imaging and true levels of amyloid plaque density as measured by histopathological assessment. The study will address the following specific aims:

  1. To expand the number of subjects included in the A07 (NCT00857415) trial correlation analysis (measuring the correlation between the global visual rating of brain amyloid plaque density on an independent blinded read of the florbetapir F 18 PET scan and the cortical amyloid plaque density at autopsy as assessed by histopathology for subjects in the autopsy cohort).
  2. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of an independent blinded visual read assessment of the florbetapir F 18 PET scan (Aβ+ or Aβ-) versus the final blinded neuropathological assessment made at autopsy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Research Site
      • Sun City, Arizona, United States, 85351
        • Research Site
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72211
        • Research Site
    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92697
        • Research Site
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33912
        • Research Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33137
        • Research Site
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33140
        • Research Site
      • Miami Springs, Florida, United States, 33166
        • Research Site
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32835
        • Research Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33709
        • Research Site
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34231
        • Research Site
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33407
        • Research Site
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21221
        • Research Site
    • Mississippi
      • Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States, 39401
        • Research Site
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12208
        • Research Site
      • New Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11040
        • Research Site
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Research Site
    • Ohio
      • Centerville, Ohio, United States, 45459
        • Research Site
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73112
        • Research Site
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Johnson City, Tennessee, United States, 37614
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects are enrolled in this study if they:

  • Met entrance criteria and were enrolled and imaged in trial 18F-AV-45-A07 (NCT00857415)
  • Gave informed consent for the 18F-AV-45-A07 (NCT00857415) study procedures and brain donation consistent with the legal requirements of the State in which they are enrolled and the State in which they die
  • Consent to participate in the 18F-AV-45-A16 (NCT01447719) extension protocol, if required by the IRB
  • Reconfirm their consent to a research brain autopsy, if required by the IRB.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity Analysis in All Autopsy Population
Time Frame: at autopsy within 24 months of florbetapir PET scan
Sensitivity of florbetapir-PET scan to detect moderate to frequent amyloid plaques. Plaque density was calculated using CERAD (Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD) criteria. Florbetpir-PET scans were read by five independent readers blinded to clinical information using the binary read method (amyloid positive/negative).
at autopsy within 24 months of florbetapir PET scan
Specificity Analysis in All Autopsy Population
Time Frame: at autopsy within 24 months of florbetapir PET scan
Specificity of florbetapir-PET scan to detect moderate to frequent amyloid plaques. Plaque density was calculated using CERAD criteria. Florbetpir-PET scans were read by five independent readers blinded to clinical information using the binary read method (amyloid positive/negative).
at autopsy within 24 months of florbetapir PET scan
Correlation of Florbetapir-PET Image and Amyloid Plaque Density
Time Frame: at autopsy within 24 months of florbetapir PET scan
Spearman's rank order correlation of the median visual read of the florbetapir-PET image and the amyloid plaque density assessed post-mortem by quantitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) averaged across 6 brain regions (precuneus, parietal cortex, frontal cortex, temporal cortex, posterior cingulate, anterior cingulate). Spearman's rank order correlation ranges from -1 to +1. A value of -1 indicates perfect negative correlation, and a value of +1 indicates a perfect positive correlation.
at autopsy within 24 months of florbetapir PET scan

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity Analysis in Subjects With Autopsy Within 1 Year of Scan
Time Frame: at autopsy within 12 months of florbetapir PET scan
Sensitivity of florbetapir-PET scan to detect moderate to frequent amyloid plaques. Plaque density was calculated using CERAD criteria. Florbetpir-PET scans were read by five independent readers blinded to clinical information using the binary read method (amyloid positive/negative).
at autopsy within 12 months of florbetapir PET scan
Specificity Analysis in Subjects With Autopsy Within 1 Year of Scan
Time Frame: at autopsy within 12 months of florbetapir PET scan
Specificity of florbetapir-PET scan to detect moderate to frequent amyloid plaques. Plaque density was calculated using CERAD criteria. Florbetpir-PET scans were read by five independent readers blinded to clinical information using the binary read method (amyloid positive/negative).
at autopsy within 12 months of florbetapir PET scan

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median Sensitivity and Specificity vs. CERAD Diagnosis
Time Frame: at autopsy within 24 months of florbetapir PET scan
Median sensitivity and specificity for 5 independent readers to detect moderate to frequent amyloid plaques (per CERAD criteria).
at autopsy within 24 months of florbetapir PET scan
Individual Reader Results (All Scans With Autopsy)
Time Frame: at autopsy within 24 months of florbetapir PET scan
Reader results (number of false negatives and number of false positives) for blinded independent readers. There were a total of 39 positive and 20 negative scans based on histopathology at autopsy.
at autopsy within 24 months of florbetapir PET scan
Individual Reader Results (Autopsy Within 1 Year of Scan)
Time Frame: at autopsy within 12 months of florbetapir PET scan
Reader results (number of false negatives and number of false positives) for blinded independent readers. There were a total of 28 positive and 18 negative scans based on histopathology at autopsy.
at autopsy within 12 months of florbetapir PET scan

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Avid Radiopharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 5, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 7, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18F-AV-45-A16

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings