Calhoun Vision Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) in Subjects With Pre-Existing Corneal Astigmatism

May 30, 2018 updated by: Calhoun Vision, Inc.

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multi-Center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) in Subjects With Pre-Existing Corneal Astigmatism

The purpose is to evaluate the Calhoun Vision Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD) for reducing astigmatism and improving uncorrected vision after implantation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arkansas
      • Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States, 72704
        • Vold Vision
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Jules Stein Eye Institute
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90505
        • Wolstan & Goldberg Eye Associates
    • Florida
      • Sebring, Florida, United States, 33870
        • Newsom Eye
    • Illinois
      • Orland Park, Illinois, United States, 60467
        • Arbor Centers for Eye Care
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46256
        • Eye Surgeons of Indiana
    • Iowa
      • Sioux City, Iowa, United States, 51104
        • Jones Eye Clinic
    • Kansas
      • Leawood, Kansas, United States, 66211
        • Discover Vision & Laser Center
    • Minnesota
      • Bloomington, Minnesota, United States, 55431
        • Minnesota Eye Consultants, PA
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63131
        • Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd.
    • New Hampshire
      • Somersworth, New Hampshire, United States, 03878
        • Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA
    • North Carolina
      • Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States, 28304
        • Carolina Vision Center
    • Ohio
      • Brecksville, Ohio, United States, 44141
        • Cleveland Eye Clinic
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57105
        • Vance Thompson Vision
    • Texas
      • Grapevine, Texas, United States, 76051
        • Eye Consultants of Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Focal Point Vision
    • Utah
      • Draper, Utah, United States, 84020
        • Hoopes Vision

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing cataract surgery and be willing to have LAL or commercially available IOL implanted
  • Pre-operative regular corneal astigmatism of >= 0.75 diopters and <= 2.0 diopters
  • Best spectacle corrected visual acuity reduced to 20/40 or worse with or without glare
  • Projected best spectacle corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better
  • Clear intraocular media other than cataract
  • Potentially good vision in fellow eye
  • Fully dilated pupil of >= 7.0 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Zonular laxity or dehiscence
  • Pseudoexfoliation
  • Age related macular degeneration
  • Retinal degenerative disorder
  • Diabetes with any evidence of retinopathy
  • Glaucomatous optic neuropathy, uveitis, significant anterior segment pathology, keratoconus
  • Corneal dystrophy, previous corneal or intraocular surgery
  • Complications during cataract surgery
  • Serious co-morbid conditions
  • Systemic medications that my increase UV sensitivity
  • Irregular astigmatism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: LAL
LAL implanted
Device: LAL (Light Adjustable Lens) and Light Deliver Device (LDD)
LAL implanted and adjusted with LDD
Active Comparator: Monofocal control
Monofocal control IOL implanted
Device: Monofocal control IOL
Commercially available monofocal intraocular lens (IOL)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Reduction in Manifest Cylinder
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent reduction in manifest cylinder from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop. Manifest cylinder refers to only the astigmatic or cylindrical component of an ophthalmic manifest refraction. For example if someone had a refraction of +0.50-1.00x090, the -1.00 is the manifest cylinder component. The reduction of the manifest cylinder is determined from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop.
6 months
Percent Absolute Reduction in MRSE
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent absolute reduction in Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop. It is used to describe an ophthalmic refraction with one number. It is defined as the (sphere)+ 0.5(cylinder). So, if you had a refraction of +1.00-1.00x090 the MRSE would be +0.50, the +1.00 is the sphere and the -1.00 is the cylinder in this example. If you had a refraction of +0.25-1.50x145 the MRSE would be -0.50. The absolute value of the MRSE is taken and its reduction is calculated from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop.
6 months
Rotation of LAL Landmark Meridian to Anatomical Landmark at Pre-Adjustment and 6 Months Postop
Time Frame: 6 months
Number (%) of eyes with rotation of LAL meridian of ≤ 5 degrees from Pre-Adjustment to 6 months postop. This endpoint was achieved by taking dilated anterior segment photographs of the LAL at Pre-Adjustment and 6 months postop. The angular difference between a landmark on the LAL and an anatomical landmark on the subjects eye was measured. The same landmarks on the LAL and the subjects eye were used at each time point. The angular difference between the two time points was then determined.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uncorrected Visual Acuity 20/20 or Better
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent of eyes with UCVA of 20/20 or better in the LAL treatment group at 6 months postoperatively was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent of eyes with UCVA of 20/20 or better in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively.
6 months
Mean Reduction in Cylinder by Cylinder Adjustment Stratum (0.75D-1.25D)
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent reduction in absolute manifest cylinder in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in absolute cylinder in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to pre-adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group. Results were to be evaluated for each cylinder adjustment stratum (0.75-1.25 D and 1.50-2.00 D) separately.
6 months
Mean Reduction in Cylinder by Cylinder Adjustment Stratum (>1.25D)
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent reduction in absolute manifest cylinder in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in absolute cylinder in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to Pre-Adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group.
6 months
Percent Absolute Reduction in Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) for Eyes With <0.75 D Cylinder Postoperatively
Time Frame: 6 months
For eyes with <0.75 D of cylinder at pre-adjustment (LAL)/17-21 days (control group), percent mean absolute reduction in MRSE by subject in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in mean absolute MRSE in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to pre-adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group.
6 months
Mean BSCVA
Time Frame: 6 months
Mean BSCVA for the "best case" cohort (no macular problems) at 6 months postoperatively was compared between the LAL treatment group and the monofocal control group. Endpoint success was to be achieved if the difference in mean BSCVA between the LAL cohort and the monofocal control group is within 1 line (0.1 LogMAR) (non-inferiority margin or delta).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Calhoun Vision, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 15, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 21, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 30, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CSP-002-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings