Calhoun Vision Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) in Subjects With Pre-Existing Corneal Astigmatism

May 30, 2018 updated by: Calhoun Vision, Inc.

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multi-Center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) in Subjects With Pre-Existing Corneal Astigmatism

The purpose is to evaluate the Calhoun Vision Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD) for reducing astigmatism and improving uncorrected vision after implantation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States, 72704
        • Vold Vision
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Jules Stein Eye Institute
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90505
        • Wolstan & Goldberg Eye Associates
    • Florida
      • Sebring, Florida, United States, 33870
        • Newsom Eye
    • Illinois
      • Orland Park, Illinois, United States, 60467
        • Arbor Centers for Eye Care
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46256
        • Eye Surgeons of Indiana
    • Iowa
      • Sioux City, Iowa, United States, 51104
        • Jones Eye Clinic
    • Kansas
      • Leawood, Kansas, United States, 66211
        • Discover Vision & Laser Center
    • Minnesota
      • Bloomington, Minnesota, United States, 55431
        • Minnesota Eye Consultants, PA
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63131
        • Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd.
    • New Hampshire
      • Somersworth, New Hampshire, United States, 03878
        • Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA
    • North Carolina
      • Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States, 28304
        • Carolina Vision Center
    • Ohio
      • Brecksville, Ohio, United States, 44141
        • Cleveland Eye Clinic
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57105
        • Vance Thompson Vision
    • Texas
      • Grapevine, Texas, United States, 76051
        • Eye Consultants of Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Focal Point Vision
    • Utah
      • Draper, Utah, United States, 84020
        • Hoopes Vision

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing cataract surgery and be willing to have LAL or commercially available IOL implanted
  • Pre-operative regular corneal astigmatism of >= 0.75 diopters and <= 2.0 diopters
  • Best spectacle corrected visual acuity reduced to 20/40 or worse with or without glare
  • Projected best spectacle corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better
  • Clear intraocular media other than cataract
  • Potentially good vision in fellow eye
  • Fully dilated pupil of >= 7.0 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Zonular laxity or dehiscence
  • Pseudoexfoliation
  • Age related macular degeneration
  • Retinal degenerative disorder
  • Diabetes with any evidence of retinopathy
  • Glaucomatous optic neuropathy, uveitis, significant anterior segment pathology, keratoconus
  • Corneal dystrophy, previous corneal or intraocular surgery
  • Complications during cataract surgery
  • Serious co-morbid conditions
  • Systemic medications that my increase UV sensitivity
  • Irregular astigmatism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LAL
LAL implanted
LAL implanted and adjusted with LDD
Active Comparator: Monofocal control
Monofocal control IOL implanted
Commercially available monofocal intraocular lens (IOL)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Reduction in Manifest Cylinder
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent reduction in manifest cylinder from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop. Manifest cylinder refers to only the astigmatic or cylindrical component of an ophthalmic manifest refraction. For example if someone had a refraction of +0.50-1.00x090, the -1.00 is the manifest cylinder component. The reduction of the manifest cylinder is determined from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop.
6 months
Percent Absolute Reduction in MRSE
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent absolute reduction in Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop. It is used to describe an ophthalmic refraction with one number. It is defined as the (sphere)+ 0.5(cylinder). So, if you had a refraction of +1.00-1.00x090 the MRSE would be +0.50, the +1.00 is the sphere and the -1.00 is the cylinder in this example. If you had a refraction of +0.25-1.50x145 the MRSE would be -0.50. The absolute value of the MRSE is taken and its reduction is calculated from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop.
6 months
Rotation of LAL Landmark Meridian to Anatomical Landmark at Pre-Adjustment and 6 Months Postop
Time Frame: 6 months
Number (%) of eyes with rotation of LAL meridian of ≤ 5 degrees from Pre-Adjustment to 6 months postop. This endpoint was achieved by taking dilated anterior segment photographs of the LAL at Pre-Adjustment and 6 months postop. The angular difference between a landmark on the LAL and an anatomical landmark on the subjects eye was measured. The same landmarks on the LAL and the subjects eye were used at each time point. The angular difference between the two time points was then determined.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uncorrected Visual Acuity 20/20 or Better
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent of eyes with UCVA of 20/20 or better in the LAL treatment group at 6 months postoperatively was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent of eyes with UCVA of 20/20 or better in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively.
6 months
Mean Reduction in Cylinder by Cylinder Adjustment Stratum (0.75D-1.25D)
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent reduction in absolute manifest cylinder in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in absolute cylinder in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to pre-adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group. Results were to be evaluated for each cylinder adjustment stratum (0.75-1.25 D and 1.50-2.00 D) separately.
6 months
Mean Reduction in Cylinder by Cylinder Adjustment Stratum (>1.25D)
Time Frame: 6 months
Percent reduction in absolute manifest cylinder in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in absolute cylinder in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to Pre-Adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group.
6 months
Percent Absolute Reduction in Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) for Eyes With <0.75 D Cylinder Postoperatively
Time Frame: 6 months
For eyes with <0.75 D of cylinder at pre-adjustment (LAL)/17-21 days (control group), percent mean absolute reduction in MRSE by subject in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in mean absolute MRSE in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to pre-adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group.
6 months
Mean BSCVA
Time Frame: 6 months
Mean BSCVA for the "best case" cohort (no macular problems) at 6 months postoperatively was compared between the LAL treatment group and the monofocal control group. Endpoint success was to be achieved if the difference in mean BSCVA between the LAL cohort and the monofocal control group is within 1 line (0.1 LogMAR) (non-inferiority margin or delta).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CSP-002-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on LAL (Light Adjustable Lens) and Light Deliver Device (LDD)

Subscribe