A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Stellate Ganglion Block in the Treatment of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

March 28, 2017 updated by: Steven Hanling, United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), is a devastating condition which causes distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important aspects of functioning. The occurrence of PTSD in the military is on the rise. This has significantly impacted military members, their families, and society as a whole. According to an expert panel convened by the Institute of Medicine in 2007, the effectiveness of most currently employed PTSD therapies is low. Safe and effective treatments are urgently needed. The specific aim of this investigation is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel approach to relieve PTSD symptoms, utilizing a procedure commonly used in pain management, a Stellate Ganglion Block (SGB) with local anesthesia. Male soldiers experiencing moderate to severe symptoms of PTSD will be recruited for evaluation of Stellate Ganglion Block with local anesthesia as an intervention for PTSD treatment. Participants will be randomized to receive either the SGB with local anesthesia to C6 tubercle or a sham procedure involving a subcutaneous saline injection to the neck. The PTSD symptoms before and after the procedure will be measured using a comprehensive clinician-administered scale, self-report measures, objective measures of cognitive ability, and physiologic reactivity measures. Subjects will undergo assessment prior to the procedure, one week following the procedure, one month and 3 months following the procedure. Patients receiving sham injections will be allowed to cross over to the treatment group. Based on published case reports of Lipov et al in Chicago and Mulvaney et al from Walter Reed Medical Center, who utilized this technique to successfully treat soldiers with combat-related PTSD, we predict that the use of Stellate Ganglion Block will result in reduction of PTSD symptoms as measured by clinician-administered scales, self-report measures, objective measures of cognitive ability, and physiologic reactivity measures, leading to a significant and lasting reduction of PTSD symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
41

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92134-1005
        • United States Naval Medical Center San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  1. Gender: Male and Female
  2. Minimum Age/ Maximum Age: Over the age of 18
  3. Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

Yes, but must be experiencing mild to severe symptoms of PTSD

Inclusion Criteria will include subjects who:

  • Subjects, (male and/or female), experiencing moderate-to-severe PTSD Symptoms
  • Subjects, (male and/or female), who elect to undergo the SGB procedure.
  • DEERS Eligible

Exclusion Criteria will include subjects who:

  • Have an acute, unstable medical condition i.e., temperature, blood pressure, heart rate outside normal limits; electrolyte abnormalities; mental conditions which preclude informed consent/unable to make decisions independently; on antibiotic therapy; uncontrolled seizures; nausea/vomiting; night sweats; blood dyscrasias.
  • Have acute infections or cardiac compromise or irregularities of heart rate or rhythm.
  • Pathologic bradycardia
  • Have local infections of the anterior neck region
  • Have severe pulmonary disease, (in severe pulmonary disease, the patient may experience severe shortness of breath on minimal exertion [even at rest], require supplemental oxygen, is progressively disabled and may have a constant cough and associated wheeze).
  • Are anticoagulated
  • Have a blood clotting disorder
  • Have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score of 3 or higher (severe systemic disease, not incapacitating)
  • Have allergic reactions to local anesthetics and / or contrast dyes,
  • Have conditions or disorders that affect cognitive functioning, including stroke, past or present diagnosis of psychosis,
  • Have conditions that invalidate testing procedures (e.g., English not first language, inability to write, speak, read, etc.)
  • Have Horner's syndrome on the right side
  • Have a diagnosis of glaucoma
  • Are pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Placebo
Subjects 1 month post in the placebo group who demonstrate either the same level of PTSD severity at enrollment or worsening of the condition (i.e., CAPS score greater than or equal to 40) will be offered SGB treatment and crossed over to active treatment. Patients who cross over from placebo to active SGB treatment will be followed one week, one month and three months after cross over.
Procedure: Placebo Procedure
In participants randomized to the placebo injection, the same positioning, monitoring, sterile preparation and technique and local anesthesia protocol will be used. The 22 g needle will instead be placed in the subcutaneous, superficial tissues overlying the C6 tubercle, but superficial enough that the prevertebral fascial plane of the stellate ganglion will not be breached. Using fluoroscopic guidance, this needle will be injected with 2 cc of contrast dye to confirm superficial spread. The needle will then be injected with 5 cc of preservative free normal saline and the needle will be removed.
Experimental: Stellate Ganglion Block (SGB)
Subjects assigned to SGB arm will undergo SGB procedure and be followed one week, one month and three months after procedure or until CAPS score is below 40.
Procedure: Stellate Ganglion Block injection with ropivicane
For participants receiving the stellate ganglion injection with ropivicaine, a 22 g needle will be directed percutaneously to the anterolateral C6 vertebral body Using ultrasound guidance to avoid the nearby vascular structures and identify the appropriate vertebral level and tissue plane. After negative aspiration for blood and CSF, and digital subtraction, 2cc of Iohexol,(Omnipaque 180) will be injected through the needle under live fluoroscopy to visualize dye spread over the pre-vertebral plane At this point, 7 cc 0.5% ropivicaine will be injected and the needle will be removed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinician Administered PSTD Scale (CAPS)
Time Frame: 1 week
The CAPS is generally considered the gold standard for PTSD assessment, and will be used to determine severity of PTSD symptoms compared to the 1 week pre baseline measures at enrollment
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSD Checklist Military Version (PCL-M)
Time Frame: 1 week
The PCL is a 17-item self-report measure of the 17 DSM-IV symptoms of PTSD. It is used to screen and diagnose individuals for PTSD, as well as monitoring symptom change during and after treatment. To be compared to the 1 week pre baseline measures at enrollment
1 week
The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 1 week
The PHQ-9 is the nine item depression scale of the Patient Health Questionnaire. The PHQ-9 is a powerful tool for assisting primary care clinicians in diagnosing depression as well as selecting and monitoring treatment. To be compared to the 1 week pre baseline measures at enrollment
1 week
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: 1 week
A 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory that is used for measuring the severity of an individual's anxiety. To be compared to the 1 week pre baseline measures at enrollment
1 week
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: 1 week
Assesses disability in work/school activities, family relationships, and social functioning, and it evaluates the functional impact of psychiatric disorders. To be compared to the 1 week pre baseline measures at enrollment
1 week
Behavioral Reactivity Test (BRT)
Time Frame: 1 week
To be compared to the 1 week pre baseline measures at enrollment
1 week
Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric (ANAM)
Time Frame: 1 week
Computer-based assessments of cognitive domains including attention, concentration, reaction time, memory, processing speed, and decision-making. Evaluate changes in an individual's cognitive status over time. To be compared to the 1 week pre baseline measures at enrollment.
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Steven Hanling, MD, CDR, United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 27, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 30, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 28, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NMCSD.2010.0157

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings