A Study Comparing Vaginal Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Induction of Labor
Randomized Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Multiparous Women
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical candidate for labor induction utilizing either misoprostol or oxytocin
- Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Multiparous
- Singleton gestation;
- Greater than 37 weeks gestation;
- Cephalic presentation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any clinical contraindication to misoprostol as induction drug
- Age less than 18 years
- Contraindication to vaginal birth
- Nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing
- Prior uterine surgery
- Active labor
- Active maternal bleeding
- Chorioamnionitis (infection)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Vaginal Misoprostol
Dosage: 25 µg every 4 hours up to a maximum of 4 doses until cervical change is consistent with a diagnosis of active labor Route of administration: Intravaginal
|
Dosage: 25 µg every 4 hours up to a maximum of 4 doses until cervical change is consistent with a diagnosis of active labor Route of administration: Intravaginal
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Intravenous Oxytocin
2 miu per minute increased in increments of 1-2 miu per minute every 30 minutes to establish an effective contraction pattern. Route of administration: intravenous |
Dosage: 2 miu per minute increased in increments of 1-2 miu per minute every 30 minutes to establish an effective contraction pattern. Route of administration: intravenous
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time From Induction to Vaginal Delivery
Time Frame: Time to delivery in minutes from initiation of medication, up to 24 hours
|
Comparing the time to delivery in multiparas undergoing induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol or intravenous oxytocin.
|
Time to delivery in minutes from initiation of medication, up to 24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Neonatal APGAR Scores
Time Frame: At 1 minute and 5 minutes after delivery
|
APGAR is a scoring system that evaluates Activity, Pulse, Grimace, Appearance, and Respiration.
Each category is given a score of 0-2 points (with 0 being absent and 2 being normal), the points are then combined for a total score that ranges from 0-10.
Scores 7 and above are generally normal, 4 to 6 are fairly low, and 2 and below are considered critically low.
|
At 1 minute and 5 minutes after delivery
|
|
Neonatal Weight at Delivery
Time Frame: Immediately following delivery
|
Neonatal Weight
|
Immediately following delivery
|
|
Maternal Delivery Outcomes
Time Frame: Through discharge from hospital
|
Maternal delivery outcomes
|
Through discharge from hospital
|
|
Maternal Satisfaction With Labor
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-partum
|
6 weeks post-partum
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Excessive Uterine Activity Necessitating Treatment
Time Frame: Measured from initiation of medication until delivery time
|
Number of patients receiving terbutaline during labor for uterine tachysytole
|
Measured from initiation of medication until delivery time
|
|
NICU Admission and APGAR Less Than 7 at 5 Minutes
Time Frame: Through discharge from hospital
|
NICU admission and APGAR less than 7 at 5 minutes
|
Through discharge from hospital
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Angela Wilson-Liverman, MSN, CNM, Vanderbilt University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chaudhuri S, Mitra SN, Banerjee PK, Biswas PK, Bhattacharyya S. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 Nov;37(11):1564-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01575.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
- Olagbuji BN, Ezeanochie MC, Kubeyinje W, Dunsin T, Ande AB. Pregnancy outcome following induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol for decreased fetal movements at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Oct;24(10):1225-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.572309. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
- Saeed GA, Fakhar S, Nisar N, Alam AY. Misoprostol for term labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;50(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2009.08.001.
- Shakya R, Shrestha J, Thapa P. Safety and efficacy of misoprostol and dinoprostone as cervical ripening agents. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2010 Jan-Mar;49(177):33-7.
- Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;2010(10):CD000941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000941.pub2.
- Crane JM, Butler B, Young DC, Hannah ME. Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review. BJOG. 2006 Dec;113(12):1366-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01111.x.
- Lin MG, Nuthalapaty FS, Carver AR, Case AS, Ramsey PS. Misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;106(3):593-601. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000172425.56840.57.
- Li XM, Wan J, Xu CF, Zhang Y, Fang L, Shi ZJ, Li K. Misoprostol in labour induction of term pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2004 Mar;117(3):449-52.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 120660
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.