WallFlex Esophageal Fully Covered (FC) Benign Anastomotic Stricture (E7025)
A Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized (RCT) Study Comparing WallFlex® Esophageal Fully Covered (FC) Metal Stent to Bougie Dilation for the Treatment of Refractory Anastomotic Esophageal Strictures
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05612-000
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
-
-
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
- Academisch Medisch Centrum
-
-
CE
-
Rotterdam, CE, Netherlands, 3015
- Erasmus Medical Center
-
-
-
-
-
Stockholm, Sweden, S-14186
- Karolinska Universitets Sjukhuset
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:Esophageal anastomotic stricture post esophagectomy (esophagogastric strictures).
- Esophagectomy performed at the same institution where patient enrollment and follow-up is planned.
- Two dilations to at least 16 mm in diameter since esophagectomy.
- 1st dilation no more than 6 months post esophagectomy and 2nd dilation within 6 months of 1st dilation to 16mm.
- Dysphagia score of 2 (ability to swallow semi-solid foods), 3 (ability to swallow liquids only) or 4 (unable to swallow liquids) at baseline.
- Unable to pass a standard endoscope (approx. 9.8 mm diameter).
- Age 18 years or older.
- Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide
Exclusion Criteria:Stricture within 2 cm of the upper esophageal sphincter.
- Dysphagia related to motility disorder.
- Non-anastomotic esophageal strictures.
- Esophagocolonic strictures.
- Planned adjuvant radiation therapy post esophagectomy.
- Prior esophageal stent placements post esophagectomy.
- Active erosive esophagitis.
- Sensitivity to any components of the stent or delivery system.
- Concurrent medical condition that would affect the investigator's ability to evaluate the patient's condition or could compromise patient safety. Participation in a clinical trial evaluating an investigational device within 3 months prior to enrollment in this study.
- Stricture length > 5 cm.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Metal Stent
The WallFlex Biliary Fully Covered Esophageal Stent System is being evaluated for treatment of refractory anastomotic esophageal strictures.
|
Temporary placement of the WallFlex Esophageal RX Fully Covered Stent for treatment of refractory anastomotic esophageal strictures.
The stent will be removed after 8 weeks (plus or minus 7 days) indwell
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Bougie Dilation
Esophageal Bougie Dilator commercially available devices used per Investigator preference are being evaluated for treatment of refractory anastomotic esophageal strictures.
|
Commercially available Esophageal Bougie Dilator Per Investigator preference
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Dilation Procedures
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number of dilation procedures for the management of dysphagia within 12 months following initial study treatment.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Technical Stent Placement Success
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Technical stent placement success is defined as the ability to deploy the stent in satisfactory position across the stricture.
|
12 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Technical Stent Removal Success
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Technical stent removal success is defined as the ability to remove the stent without complications.
|
12 months
|
|
Patient's Satisfaction With the Therapy
Time Frame: Day 2, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12
|
Patient's satisfaction with the therapy (scored by a visual analog scale) assessed at day 2, week 2, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 6, month 9, and month 12. Patient Satisfaction with Therapy scale ranges from 0-10.
The minimum on this scale is 0 (0 being completely unsatisfied with the therapy; a worse outcome) and the maximum on this scale is 10 (10 being completely satisfied with the therapy; a better outcome).
|
Day 2, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12
|
|
Patient's Report of Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 2, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12
|
Patient's report of pain (scored by a visual analog scale) assessed at Baseline, day 2, week 2, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 6, month 9, and month 12. Pain Numerical Rating Scale ranges from 0-10.
The minimum on this scale is 0 (0 being no pain; a better outcome) and the maximum on this scale is 10 (10 being worst pain ever; a worse outcome).
|
Baseline, Day 2, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12
|
|
Quality Of Life Overall Health Score
Time Frame: Day 2, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12
|
Quality of life scale measuring overall health score assessed at day 2, week 2, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 6, month 9, and month 12.
The scale is numbered from 0 to 100.
0 is the worst health the participant can imagine.
100 is the best health the participant can imagine.
A lower score indicates a worse outcome.
A higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
Day 2, Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12
|
|
Occurrence and Severity of Adverse Events Related to the Stent/Bougie Dilator and/or the Procedure
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Occurrence and severity of adverse events related to the stent/bougie dilator and/or the procedure.
|
12 months
|
|
Time to Recurrence of Dysphagia
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Time to recurrence of dysphagia, defined as inability of a normal diameter gastroscope (9.8mm) to pass the stricture.
|
12 months
|
|
Total Number of Stent Migrations
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Total number of stent migrations with or without symptoms.
|
12 months
|
|
Number of Reinterventions Within 12 Months Following the Initial Study Treatment
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number of reinterventions within 12 months following the initial study treatment.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter D. Siersema, MD, study principal investigator
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 90913904
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.