Activity of Sorafenib in Salivary Gland Cancer

October 18, 2023 updated by: Lisa Licitra, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano

Sorafenib in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Salivary Gland Carcinomas: Phase II Study

This is a single agent, prospective, open-label, monocenter, phase II trial of sorafenib in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland carcinoma. This trial will be conducted with the primary aim to determine the response rate (CR+PR) according to the RECIST criteria. Response rate according to CHOI criteria, correlation between CHOI criteria and outcome, disease Control Rate (DCR) and acute toxicity will be evaluated as secondary objectives.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This phase II trial was conducted on adult patients with RMSGC. Inclusion criteria were as follows: histologically proven diagnosis of RMSGC; availability of primary tissue (block or formalin fixed paraffin embedded [FFPE] tissue slides); age _18 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) 0e1; adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function (haemoglobin >9.0 g/dl; neutrophil count >1500/mm3; platelet count _100,000/ml; total bilirubin <1.5 _ upper limit of normal [ULN]; ALT and AST <2.5 _ ULN and <5 _ ULN for patients with liver metastases; serum creatinine <1.5 _ ULN; alkaline phosphatase <4 _ ULN; PT-INR/PTT <1.5 _ ULN); _1 measurable unidimensional lesion by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Patients with cardiac disease (i.e. congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) > 2, cardiac arrhythmia; uncontrolled hypertension) in the six months before study entry were excluded. Previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease was allowed and progression of disease was not required for the enrolment. All patients provided written informed consent. The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Ethical Committee (Registry number, NCT01703455). 2.2. Treatment and assessments: Patients received 400 mg of sorafenib orally every 12 h on a continuous basis in 4-week cycles until disease progression and/or unacceptable toxicity. Biochemical and clinical evaluation, and drug safety monitoring according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 were performed every 4 weeks. The attribution of adverse events (AEs) to the study drug was judged by the investigators. CT scans were performed every 8 weeks until disease progression. An independent evaluation of radiological response (RECIST and Choi criteria) was performed by two radiologists on anonymised CT scans. Stomatology evaluation was performed at baseline to exclude any sign of osteoradionecrosis. Dose reduction was adopted in cases of clinically significant haematologic or other AEs that were considered related to sorafenib. In such cases, doses were reduced to 400 mg once daily and then to 400 mg every other day. If further reductions were required, patients were withdrawn from the trial. Dose reescalation was not allowed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Milano, Italy, 20133
        • IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven relapsed and/or metastatic salivary gland cancer for which potentially curative options such as surgery or radiotherapy are not indicated
  • One target lesion measurable by CT-scan or MRI according to RECIST criteria
  • Age + 18 years
  • ECOG 0 or 1
  • Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function
  • Signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors
  • History of cardiac disease such as congestive heart failure>NYHA class 2
  • Active CAD
  • Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy or uncontrolled hypertension
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding patient
  • Patients with evidence or history of bleeding diathesis
  • Patients undergoing renal dialysis
  • Patients unable to swallow oral medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily
Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily, on a continuous basis (each morning and evening), in 4 week cycles
Drug: Sorafenib
400 mg twice daily, on a continuous basis (each morning and evening), in 4 week cycles
Other Names:
  • Nexavar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Response Rate according to RECIST criteria. Response will be evaluated every 2 months.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
response rate according to CHOI criteria
Time Frame: 8 weeks
assessment of tumor response according to CHOI criteria
8 weeks
correlation between CHOI criteria and outcome
Time Frame: one year
correlation between CHOI criteria and survival (OS and PFS)
one year

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
adverse events
Time Frame: 4 weeks
number of patients with adverse events
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lisa Licitra, MD, Prof, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 18, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • INT29/10

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings