Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness in Chronic Heart Failure (CASA) Trial (CASA)

July 28, 2017 updated by: David Bekelman, M.D., Denver Research Institute
Chronic heart failure is an important public health problem as it is a leading cause of disability, hospitalization, death, and costs. People who live with advanced chronic heart failure suffer from numerous symptoms that affect their daily lives. The investigators are conducting a randomized clinical trial to evaluate a symptom management and psychosocial care intervention to improve health status (symptom burden, functioning, and quality of life). The results will be directly relevant to patients and families who suffer with this illness, as well as to providers, payers, and other researchers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
317

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • Denver Health
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80220
        • VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System(ECHCS)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years of age or older
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Consistent access to a telephone
  • Patients have a primary care or other provider who is willing to facilitate intervention medical recommendations
  • A diagnosis of heart failure with at least one of the following:

[hospitalization primarily for heart failure in the year prior (including current); taking at least 20 mg oral furosemide (or equivalent) daily in a single or divided dose; Brain natriuretic peptide(BNP) ≥ 100 or N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP) ≥ 500; EF≤40%]

  • Report a low health status (KCCQ-SF≤70)
  • Bothered by at least one target symptom:

[Pain; Depression; Fatigue; Breathlessness]

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of dementia
  • Active substance abuse or dependence, defined by either a diagnosis of abuse or dependence or an AUDIT-C ≥ 8, or self-reported substance abuse in the past 3 months
  • Comorbid metastatic cancer
  • Nursing home resident
  • Heart Transplant recipient
  • LVAD recipient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CASA Intervention

The CASA (Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness) intervention includes 3 components:

  • A nurse (RN) follows structured algorithms to help patients with symptoms, specifically breathlessness, fatigue, pain, and depression.
  • A social worker provides structured counseling targeting adjustment to illness and depression if present.
  • A collaborative care model of care delivery, in which the nurse and social worker meet weekly with a primary care provider, cardiologist and palliative care specialist. This team makes medical recommendations to the intervention subjects' providers and supervises the nurse and social worker.

Most of the nurse and social worker visits are by phone.
Other: CASA Intervention

CASA Intervention

The CASA (Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness) intervention includes 3 components:

A nurse (RN) follows structured algorithms to help patients with symptoms, specifically breathlessness, fatigue, pain, and depression.

A social worker provides structured counseling targeting adjustment to illness and depression if present.

A collaborative care model of care delivery, in which the nurse and social worker meet weekly with a primary care provider, cardiologist and palliative care specialist. This team makes medical recommendations to the intervention subjects' providers and supervises the nurse and social worker.

Most of the nurse and social worker visits are by phone.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Patients in the control group will continue to receive care at the discretion of their providers, which may include referral to cardiology, palliative care, or mental health. If patients self-report depression on baseline surveys, this information will be given to their provider, and patients will be given resources. Patients will have the same amount of interaction with research assistants as the intervention patients, completing questionnaires and participating in study visits at the same frequency.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall score
Time Frame: 6 months
The KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that measures heart failure-specific health status. The KCCQ is reliable, sensitive to clinical change, and predicts hospitalization and mortality. The study will test whether there is a difference in KCCQ overall score between the intervention and control groups at 6 months.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score
Time Frame: 6 months
The PHQ-9 is a 9-item valid and reliable instrument that provides a continuous measure of depressive symptoms and is 88% sensitive and specific for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. The PHQ-9 was developed in medically-ill outpatients, including patients with heart failure.
6 months
Difference in symptom distress, measured using the General Symptom Distress Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
The General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS)includes a measure of overall symptom distress and ability to manage symptoms.
6 months
Difference in Self-care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI)
Time Frame: 12 months
The SCHFI is a valid and reliable 22-item self-report measure of self-care that includes three self-care scales: maintenance, management, and confidence
12 months
Difference in Satisfaction with Healthcare
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Difference in pain using the PEG
Time Frame: 6 months
The PEG items assess average pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G).
6 months
Change in fatigue using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue measure
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Change in Dyspnea
Time Frame: 6 months
PEG pain measure modified to assess breathlessness
6 months
Change in Sheehan Disability Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
Measure of functioning
12 months
Change in Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-E)
Time Frame: 12 months
The QUAL-E is a valid and reliable self-report measure of several domains, each scored separately, of quality of life in advanced illness. We will use the relationship with health care system, preparation, life completion, and global quality of life sub-scales.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Denver Research Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Colorado, Denver
University of Iowa
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System
Denver Health Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David Bekelman, MD, MPH, Denver Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 29, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 3, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 5R01NR013422-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 11-0969 (Other Identifier: Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB))

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on CASA Intervention

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings