Carpal Arch Space Augmentation (CASA) Clinical Trial (CASA)

January 5, 2024 updated by: Zong-Ming Li, University of Arizona

Biomechanical Treatment of CTS Via Carpal Arch Space Augmentation: A Pilot Clinical Trial

This research proposes to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel device designed for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. The device applies a small cyclic force to the wrist. The cycles include a small time period of force is applied, followed by a brief period of no force. The device is intended to be worn during hours of sleep. The efficacy of the treatment is evaluated based on patient reported outcomes. Treatment efficacy will also be evaluated based on comparisons to patient reported outcomes for a SOC treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a commonly diagnosed disorder of the hand that affects 3.7% of the population. Carpal tunnel release surgery can provide some symptomatic relief to patients but surgical transection of the transverse carpal ligament can disrupt essential anatomical, biomechanical, and physiological functions of the carpal tunnel. This clinical trial seeks to determine the effectiveness of the CASA device in alleviating CTS pain by augmenting the carpal arch space. During an early investigation of the transverse carpal ligament, investigators discovered the biomechanical mechanism of carpal arch space augmentation (CASA) for median nerve decompression. The CASA approach is supported extensively through research findings utilizing geometric modeling, finite element analysis, in vitro cadaveric experiments, and in vivo human studies.

In this proposed pilot clinical trial, investigators will compare the device's performance with a widely accepted standard of care (SOC) brace intervention (Thermoformable Exos# Wrist Brace, DJO, Vista, CA). Incorporating the CASA intervention as part of a brace is an innovative intervention study design offering a unique opportunity to identify the additive benefit of CASA and for patients to benefit from the combined effects of both CASA and a SOC.

This study is designed to be a randomized, single-blinded, two-arm trial. A sufficient number of patients will be recruited such that a total of 76 subjects will successfully complete the baseline run-in period and be randomized, with consideration of a 20% attrition rate among randomized patients, to yield 60 participants with complete data. The CASA group will be required to undergo wrist compression during the evening. The wrist compression is achieved by automated inflation of the balloon for a saturated pressure of 140 mmHg, which is calibrated to impart the targeted therapeutic compression force on the patient's wrist of 10 N. The intervention period will last for four weeks for the CASA group. For the SOC group, there is no compression force, as it is measuring a brace-alone condition, and will similarly last for a period of four weeks.

Patients will self-administer their assigned intervention of either CASA or sham device, and will have off-site access to study materials and questionnaire journals, thus reducing participant burden and eliminating travel expense. Data forms are designed to capture all data elements with the structure to facilitate completeness, quality, and statistical analysis. Furthermore, exploratory endpoints will be evaluated such as (a) number of participants that began to take analgesics during the study intervention phase, (b) the number of participants who opted for surgery during the intervention and post-intervention follow-up phases, (c) per-protocol comparisons of treatment arms, and (d) the impact of sex on response to treatment.

The trial will consist of 3 phases for participants; run-in, intervention, follow-up. During the run-in phase, subjects will be randomized and undergo compliance testing, along with a brief duration of device wearing, to ensure they conform with protocol instructions.

Once participants successfully complete the run-in, they will move into the intervention phase. During the intervention phase, subjects will wear their arm's respective device/brace nightly. Participants will report their adherence each day before falling asleep and once again upon waking. Participants will receive weekly phone calls in which they will report the outcome measures for the week to a member of the study team who will record the data.

After the intervention phase, participants will proceed to the follow-up phase which will last for four weeks. In this phase, participants will continue to receive weekly phone calls.

Regardless what the participant's compliance to protocol requirements for abstaining from analgesics or wearing the device 8 hours per day, the participant will be asked to complete their journals per protocol for the primary intent to treat outcome. The data gained from these patients will be used in an exploratory statistical analysis to determine if any significant differences exist between patients who were compliant to the study and those who were not. If adherence standards are not consistently met within either treatment group, a sensitivity analysis using a per-protocol cohort will be performed. A significance level of 0.05 will be assumed for tests of the primary outcome. Analyses of secondary outcomes will be interpreted cautiously due to multiple comparisons.

It is predicted that an intervention period of wearing the CASA device will significantly improve patient reported outcomes of the primary endpoint, BCTQ SSS, and some of the secondary endpoints. Furthermore, it is expected that the positive effects of the CASA device intervention will continue after the treatment period has concluded. In both long-term wear and combined CASA-brace effect, it is anticipated that the CASA device group will outperform the SOC group in alleviating patient symptoms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18 and older
  • Diagnosed with right-handed or bilateral CTS. Participants will be treated only in the right hand.

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of traumatic or chronic neuromusculoskeletal disorders involving the right upper extremity.
  • Systemic diseases (e.g. diabetes, thyroid disease, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, renal failure, hemodialysis, sarcoidosis, amyloidosis)
  • Positive diagnosis of cervical disorders such as radiculopathy, spondylosis, tumor, and multiple sclerosis
  • Degenerative joint diseases in the right hand (e.g., Osteoarthritis)
  • Osteoporosis in the right hand
  • History of carpal tunnel release in the right hand
  • History of conservative CTS treatments in the right hand within the 3 months preceding study initiation (e.g. splinting, corticosteroid injections, oral anti-inflammatory medication, physical therapy)
  • Body mass index greater than 35
  • Women who are currently pregnant
  • Patients who have carpal tunnel release surgery scheduled for the next 12 weeks.
  • Patients who have taken pain medication within 2 weeks prior to initiation of the study.
  • Will not participate in other CTS treatment or therapies during this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CASA Arm
Arm that will be given the test intervention device.
A BOA brace with a balloon that is affixed internally. The device applies a small cyclic force of to the wrist. The cycles include a brief period of force applied, followed by a brief period of no force. The device is intended to be worn during hours of sleep.
Active Comparator: SOC Arm
Arm that is given a standard brace used for treating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome pain.
A BOA brace that can be adjusted to the arm of the participant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ SSS)
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 8 weeks

The BCTQ SSS is a validated, self-reported instrument used in the assessment of pain intensity for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Higher numbers are worse outcomes. Possible scores range from 1 ("normal", "no pain", or "without difficulty") to 5 ("very serious", "continued", "more than 5 times")

Change = (Baseline score - week 8 score)

Baseline and up to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Functional Status Scale (BCTQ FSS)
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 8 weeks

The BCTQ FSS is a validated, self-reported instrument used in the assessment of hand function for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Higher numbers are worse outcomes. Possible scores range from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (cannot perform activity at all due to symptoms)

Change = (Baseline score - week 8 score)

Baseline and up to 8 weeks
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 8 weeks

The MHQ is a valid and reliable instrument for the outcomes in comparing pain and task completion between right and left hands. For scales in sections I and II of the MHQ, higher numbers are worse outcomes. Possible scores range from 1 ("very good", "not at all difficult") to 5 ("very poor", very difficult")

For scales in sections III and IV of the MHQ, higher numbers are better outcomes. Possible scores range from 1 (always) to 5 (never).

For scales in sections V and VI of the MHQ, higher numbers are worse outcomes. Possible scores range from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree)

Change = (Baseline score - week 8 score)

Baseline and up to 8 weeks
Visual Analog Scales for pain, tingling, and numbness
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 8 weeks

Scales used to report pain, tingling, numbness intensity by the participant. Higher numbers are worse outcomes. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Change = (Baseline score - week 8 score)

Baseline and up to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

January 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No current plan exists. If data is shared in the future, it will only be deidentified data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on carpal arch space augmentation (CASA)

3
Subscribe