Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness in Chronic Heart Failure (CASA) Trial (CASA)

July 28, 2017 updated by: David Bekelman, M.D., Denver Research Institute
Chronic heart failure is an important public health problem as it is a leading cause of disability, hospitalization, death, and costs. People who live with advanced chronic heart failure suffer from numerous symptoms that affect their daily lives. The investigators are conducting a randomized clinical trial to evaluate a symptom management and psychosocial care intervention to improve health status (symptom burden, functioning, and quality of life). The results will be directly relevant to patients and families who suffer with this illness, as well as to providers, payers, and other researchers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

317

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • Denver Health
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80220
        • VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System(ECHCS)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years of age or older
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Consistent access to a telephone
  • Patients have a primary care or other provider who is willing to facilitate intervention medical recommendations
  • A diagnosis of heart failure with at least one of the following:

[hospitalization primarily for heart failure in the year prior (including current); taking at least 20 mg oral furosemide (or equivalent) daily in a single or divided dose; Brain natriuretic peptide(BNP) ≥ 100 or N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP) ≥ 500; EF≤40%]

  • Report a low health status (KCCQ-SF≤70)
  • Bothered by at least one target symptom:

[Pain; Depression; Fatigue; Breathlessness]

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of dementia
  • Active substance abuse or dependence, defined by either a diagnosis of abuse or dependence or an AUDIT-C ≥ 8, or self-reported substance abuse in the past 3 months
  • Comorbid metastatic cancer
  • Nursing home resident
  • Heart Transplant recipient
  • LVAD recipient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CASA Intervention

The CASA (Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness) intervention includes 3 components:

  • A nurse (RN) follows structured algorithms to help patients with symptoms, specifically breathlessness, fatigue, pain, and depression.
  • A social worker provides structured counseling targeting adjustment to illness and depression if present.
  • A collaborative care model of care delivery, in which the nurse and social worker meet weekly with a primary care provider, cardiologist and palliative care specialist. This team makes medical recommendations to the intervention subjects' providers and supervises the nurse and social worker.

Most of the nurse and social worker visits are by phone.

CASA Intervention

The CASA (Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness) intervention includes 3 components:

A nurse (RN) follows structured algorithms to help patients with symptoms, specifically breathlessness, fatigue, pain, and depression.

A social worker provides structured counseling targeting adjustment to illness and depression if present.

A collaborative care model of care delivery, in which the nurse and social worker meet weekly with a primary care provider, cardiologist and palliative care specialist. This team makes medical recommendations to the intervention subjects' providers and supervises the nurse and social worker.

Most of the nurse and social worker visits are by phone.

No Intervention: Usual Care
Patients in the control group will continue to receive care at the discretion of their providers, which may include referral to cardiology, palliative care, or mental health. If patients self-report depression on baseline surveys, this information will be given to their provider, and patients will be given resources. Patients will have the same amount of interaction with research assistants as the intervention patients, completing questionnaires and participating in study visits at the same frequency.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall score
Time Frame: 6 months
The KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire that measures heart failure-specific health status. The KCCQ is reliable, sensitive to clinical change, and predicts hospitalization and mortality. The study will test whether there is a difference in KCCQ overall score between the intervention and control groups at 6 months.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score
Time Frame: 6 months
The PHQ-9 is a 9-item valid and reliable instrument that provides a continuous measure of depressive symptoms and is 88% sensitive and specific for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. The PHQ-9 was developed in medically-ill outpatients, including patients with heart failure.
6 months
Difference in symptom distress, measured using the General Symptom Distress Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
The General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS)includes a measure of overall symptom distress and ability to manage symptoms.
6 months
Difference in Self-care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI)
Time Frame: 12 months
The SCHFI is a valid and reliable 22-item self-report measure of self-care that includes three self-care scales: maintenance, management, and confidence
12 months
Difference in Satisfaction with Healthcare
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Difference in pain using the PEG
Time Frame: 6 months
The PEG items assess average pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and interference with general activity (G).
6 months
Change in fatigue using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue measure
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Change in Dyspnea
Time Frame: 6 months
PEG pain measure modified to assess breathlessness
6 months
Change in Sheehan Disability Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
Measure of functioning
12 months
Change in Quality of Life at the End of Life (QUAL-E)
Time Frame: 12 months
The QUAL-E is a valid and reliable self-report measure of several domains, each scored separately, of quality of life in advanced illness. We will use the relationship with health care system, preparation, life completion, and global quality of life sub-scales.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Bekelman, MD, MPH, Denver Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 3, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5R01NR013422-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 11-0969 (Other Identifier: Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB))

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on CASA Intervention

Subscribe