Impact of Home Monitoring to Decrease the Treatment Burden for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) (Liberty)

October 2, 2017 updated by: Retinal Consultants of Arizona

A Clinical Trial to Assess the Impact of Home Monitoring to Decrease the Treatment Burden for Neovascular Macular Degeneration (the LIBERTY Study).

A study to use in home technology to reduce the burden of in office visits and injections.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Without frequent measurement of vision to monitor disease progression some people may be under-treated, while others over-treated. Under-treatment can lead to severe and irreversible disease progression and associated loss of vision. Over-treatment is expensive, uncomfortable and potentially increases the risk of complications. A self-monitoring device such as DigiSight can help subjects keep close control of their treatment, but alleviate the burden of in office monitoring visits. A decreased number of office visits in combination with the home self-monitoring may provide an effective alternative dosing regimen, allowing the physician and subject to closely track the disease progression and treatment effect without the demands of monthly or frequent visits to the office.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Gilbert, Arizona, United States, 85296
        • Retinal Consultants of Arizona
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85210
        • Retinal Consultants of Arizona
      • Peoria, Arizona, United States, 85381
        • Retinal Consultants of Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85014
        • Retinal Consultants of Arizona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study
  • Age > 50 years
  • Choroidal neovascular membrane (CNV) secondary to AMD, as confirmed by the patient's medical history and a documented diagnosis of CNV
  • The study eye must have received at least 3 anti-Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments prior to the screening visit, with at least 2 anti-VEGF treatments over the preceding 3 months.
  • Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/32 to 20/200 Snellen equivalent in the study eye
  • Noted presence of intra- or sub-retinal fluid on OCT in the study eye
  • Adequate pupillary dilation to permit thorough ocular examination and testing in both eyes
  • Proficiency in using the DigiSight SightBook™ mobile vision assessment tool on study-supplied Apple iPad or iPod device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CNV in the study eye due to any reason other than AMD
  • Active uncontrolled glaucoma
  • Had any intraocular surgeries in the study eye within 3 months of enrollment or are known or likely candidates for intraocular surgery (including cataract surgery) in the study eye within 1 year of enrollment
  • Acute or chronic ocular or periocular infection in the study eye, uveitis or ocular inflammation in the study eye
  • Received Photo Dynamic Therapy (PDT) in the study eye within 60 days, or laser photocoagulation within 14 days prior to screening
  • Currently using any periocular or intravitreal steroids within 3 months prior to screening (study eye)
  • Unstable or severe cardiovascular disease, e.g., congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Functional class III/IV), myocardial infarction within 6 months, ventricular tachyarrhythmias requiring ongoing treatment, unstable angina, or critical limb ischemia
  • Poorly controlled diabetes
  • Cerebrovascular disease within 12 months prior to Screening
  • Dementia or neurodegenerative disease (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease)
  • Received any investigational product within 30 days prior to Screening
  • Inability to properly use the SightBook™ app

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Lucentis every 4 weeks
Lucentis 0.5mg administered intravitreally every four weeks for 12 months
Drug: Lucentis every 4 weeks
Lucentis 0.5mg administered intravitreally every four weeks for 12 months
Active Comparator: Lucentis every 12 weeks
Lucentis 0.5mg administered intravitreally every 12 weeks
Drug: Lucentis every 12 weeks
Lucentis 0.5mg administered intravitreally every twelve weeks for 12 months
Experimental: Treat and extend
Lucentis 0.5mg will be administered on an as needed basis after a loading dose using a treatment extending protocol and home monitoring.
Drug: Lucentis (Treat and extend)
Lucentis 0.5mg will be administered on an as needed basis after a loading dose using a treatment extending protocol and home monitoring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: 12 months
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as assessed by the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinoptahy Study (ETDRS) eye chart at a starting test distance of 4 meters, at Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central foveal thickness
Time Frame: 12 months
Central foveal thickness as determined by Spectral Domain-Ocular Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT).
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of office visits needed
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of office visits completed for patients on Arm C (treat-and-extend arm), compared to those on Arms A and B
12 months
Number of required injections
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of Lucentis® injections administered to patients in Arm C, compared to those on Arms A and B
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Retinal Consultants of Arizona

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Genentech, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Pravin U Dugel, MD, Retinal Consultants of Arizona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 24, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 2, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ML28727

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings