The Safety and Efficacy of a Peanut Immunotherapy Dissolving Film for Peanut Allergy

July 2, 2018 updated by: Johns Hopkins University
The purpose of this study is to determine if a new method of administration of peanut sublingual immunotherapy, a dissolving peanut film, is effective.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Peanut allergy is a common problem with no current treatment. Recent studies have shown some success with oral or sublingual immunotherapy for the treatment of food allergy. Oral treatment, which requires very high doses, is associated with a small but appreciable risk of systemic reactions. Sublingual immunotherapy, which utilizes much smaller doses, is safer but constraints inherent in the available methods of sublingual administration have limited the utility of this method. Typically sublingual immunotherapy for food allergy has used either fresh foods or a simple liquid extract. These methods are not optimized for practicality or dwell duration in the mouth, and, thus far, dosing has been limited by the ability to make concentrated extracts and by the volume of extract that can be applied to the sublingual space. This study is being conducted to determine if a dissolving peanut extract film, will improve efficacy for immunotherapy for peanut allergy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 50 years
  • Provide signed informed consent
  • Using appropriate birth control if subject is female and of child bearing age
  • Are available for the study duration

Healthy Volunteers Only

  • Regularly consume a meal sized portion (5 grams) of peanut at least twice per month during the proceeding 6 months

Peanut Allergic Subjects Only

  • Have a history of symptomatic reactivity to peanut
  • Have a positive skin prick test
  • Have a positive oral food challenge to peanut at a cumulative dose of less than 1 grams of peanut protein
  • Have self-injectable epinephrine available at home

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a history of severe anaphylaxis to peanut, defined as hypoxia, hypotension or neurological compromise as a result of ingestion of peanut.
  • Have a history of intubation related to asthma
  • Are pregnant or lactating
  • Have a viral Upper Respiratory Infection (URI) or gastroenteritis within 7 days of Oral food challenge
  • Have pulmonary function tests <80% of predicted (FEV1) or clinical history consistent with more than moderate persistent asthma
  • Are currently taking greater than medium dose inhaled corticosteroid (>500 mcg/day fluticasone or fluticasone equivalent)
  • Are unable to discontinue antihistamines for 5 days for long acting and 3 days for short acting prior to skin testing or food challenges
  • Have used systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to baseline visit
  • Are receiving omalizumab, beta-blocker, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or tricyclic antidepressant therapy. Subjects need to be off omalizumab for 6 months.
  • Have history of oral cancer.
  • Use oral tobacco (i.e., chew tobacco)
  • Have a chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis or rhinitis) requiring therapy (e.g., heart disease, diabetes)
  • Have participated in any interventional study for treatment of a food allergy in the past 12 months
  • Have a history of eosinophilic esophagitis

  • Have a severe reaction at initial double blind placebo-controlled food challenge, defined as either:

    • Life-threatening anaphylaxis, or
    • Reaction requiring hospitalization

Healthy Volunteers Only

  • History of any allergy to peanut

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Peanut Allergic
Only one intervention will be given. Peanut allergic study subjects, will receive gradually increasing doses of the dissolving peanut film.
Drug: Peanut Dissolving Film
Active Comparator: Healthy Volunteers
Healthy volunteers will receive active peanut dissolving films in an expedited manner in order to determine safety dissolving films.
Drug: Peanut Dissolving Film

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Proportion of Subjects That Discontinue the Study for Treatment Related Reasons
Time Frame: 18 months
No healthy volunteers discontinued the study for treatment related reasons. No active participants enrolled.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Proportion of Subjects Who Are Able to Tolerate the Full 10 Gram Peanut Protein Challenge at the Completion of the Study
Time Frame: 18 months
For peanut allergic subjects only
18 months
Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Effects With Therapy
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
The Rate of Medication Use With Therapy
Time Frame: 18 months
For peanut allergic subjects only.
18 months
Changes in Biomarkers (Peanut Specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG), Basophil Reactivity, and Salivary Biomarkers) From Baseline to the End of Therapy
Time Frame: 18 months
Only in peanut allergic subjects
18 months
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events With Dosing
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johns Hopkins University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Hugh Sampson, MD, Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai
  • Principal Investigator: Corinne Keet, MD, MS, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 3, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 3, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NA_00042409

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings