Nanocytology Test to Evaluate Skin Cancer in High Risk Patients

November 17, 2014 updated by: Joan Guitart, Northwestern University

Nanocytology Evaluation of Epidermal Cells to Assess Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Field Cancerization in High Risk Patients

The purpose of this study is to correlate pathological features from specimens in order to determine if this new molecular diagnostic technique can be used to detect risk of skin cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Squamous cell carcinoma is the culmination of a multistep carcinogenesis process that is preceded by early stages referred as squamous dysplasia and actinic keratosis. Squamous dysplasia (SD) also known as "field effect" is clinically characterized by xerosis (dry, scaly skin), lentigines and uneven pigmentation. While morphologically skin biopsies and cytology samples show only minimal changes, at the molecular level it is known that SD is characterized by small clone keratinocytes carrying mutations of the P53 gene. An optical technology called Partial Wave Spectroscopy (PWS) probes nanoscale structures in the order of tens to a few hundred nanometers. PWS is a light back-scattering techniques that uses light reflected off of a tissue sample. The measured biomarker is sensitive to the cytosolic and nucleic architecture within the cell and quantifies the nanoscale disorder, which conventional light microscopy fails to appreciate. PWS has allowed to identify various grades of structural disorder at the nanoscale level of colonic and pulmonary premalignant cell samples. Using PWS we aim to study the spectrum of cutaneous SD from patients at high risk for SCC development. Since squamous dysplasia is difficult to assess with routine histology and cytopathology and a grading system for squamous dysplasia by routine histology or cytology is not available, we propose to assess the value of PWS as a new and more sensitive imaging technique. By identifying the degree of SD at the molecular level, we may be able to intervene with close surveillance, early treatment and chemoprevention strategies to achieve lower morbidity by means of fewer and smaller skin cancers.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 89 years old, male and female, Fitzpatrick skin phototype I - III
  • Photodamage skin grades 3 - 4 (global assessment)
  • Medical history of precancerous lesions and or known history of SCC or healthy volunteers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects under 18 years old
  • Pregnant women or lactating mothers
  • Treatment with systemic chemotherapy within 4 weeks period before consent
  • Known HIV+ patients (self-reported)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Subjects at risk of skin cancer
Subjects at risk of skin cancer (sun-damaged skin) a superficial shave biopsy will be performed.
Procedure: Superficial shave biopsy
Sample will be obtained from random dorsal forearm skin sites without evidence of keratotic lesions. The site will be selected by the investigator. Skin will first be wiped with an alcohol pad and 1% lidocaine will be superficially infiltrated per standard skin surgical procedures. 30% trichloroacetic acid (TCA, standard chemical peel) will then be applied for five minutes. TCA will be neutralized using bicarbonate. Using a cytology brush (a small brush which is used to collect cells during the course of a biopsy) cells will be collected by gentle scraping surface of the skin. Then, a superficial shave biopsy specimen, obtained by using a dermablade (a flexible, one piece blade specifically designed for shave biopsy and excision of skin lesions) will be obtained.
Other: Subjects with healthy skin
Subjects without sun-damaged skin a superficial shave biopsy will be performed.
Procedure: Superficial shave biopsy
Sample will be obtained from random dorsal forearm skin sites without evidence of keratotic lesions. The site will be selected by the investigator. Skin will first be wiped with an alcohol pad and 1% lidocaine will be superficially infiltrated per standard skin surgical procedures. 30% trichloroacetic acid (TCA, standard chemical peel) will then be applied for five minutes. TCA will be neutralized using bicarbonate. Using a cytology brush (a small brush which is used to collect cells during the course of a biopsy) cells will be collected by gentle scraping surface of the skin. Then, a superficial shave biopsy specimen, obtained by using a dermablade (a flexible, one piece blade specifically designed for shave biopsy and excision of skin lesions) will be obtained.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nanocytology assessment of skin cancer risk
Time Frame: 1 year
The primary outcome measure is to correlate clinical phenotype (age, skin phototype, level of photodamage, history of prior skin cancers) with morphology and nuclear characteristics, in order to determine if this new molecular diagnostic technique can be used to detect early stages of skin carcinogenesis and identify high risk-patients.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare nanocytology assessment with pathological findings
Time Frame: 1 year
Secondary outcome measure is to compare PWS results and clinical phenotype with the evaluation of skin samples by routine cytology/pathology, as they relate to the clinical level of overall photodamaged and prior history of skin cancers.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northwestern University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Joan Guitart, MD, Northwestern University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 23, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 19, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JG05012013

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings