Drug Use Investigation for Toviaz

May 14, 2021 updated by: Pfizer

DRUG USE INVESTIGATION FOR TOVIAZ

The purpose of this study is to collect effectiveness and safety information of fesoterodine related to their appropriate use in daily practice.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2521

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients prescribed fesoterodine (Toviaz) by investigators involved in protocol A0221096.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients prescribed fesoterodine (Toviaz).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are no exclustion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Fesoterodine (Toviaz)
Drug: Fesoterodine (Toviaz)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg orally. Toviaz will be dosed according to labeling. The administration and duration of therapy will be determined by the treating physician to meet the patient's needs for treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.
12 Weeks
Clinical Efficacy Rate
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Clinical efficacy rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Overall effectiveness of fesoterodine fumarate was determined by the investigator based on clinical symptoms and examinations. Clinical effectiveness was assessed according to the following categories: (1) effective, (2) ineffective, or (3) unassessable at week 12 of the treatment.
12 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. A treatment-related serious adverse event was a treatment-related adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; lifethreatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.
12 Weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Unexpected From Japanese Package Insert
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Expectedness of the adverse event was determined according to the Japanese package insert. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.
12 Weeks
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Cognitive Function Disorder
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Adverse events related to cognitive function disorder were identified by broad searches on the Standard MedDRA Queries (SMQ).
12 Weeks
Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, concentration, naming, repetition, comprehension, and ability to create a sentence and to copy two intersecting polygons. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. Mean change from baseline in the MMSE score at 12 weeks was presented along with the corresponding standard deviation.
Baseline, 12 Weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whom Received Concomitant CYP3A4 Inhibitors
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors included atazanavir, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and telithromycin.
12 Weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whom Received Concomitant CYP2D6 Inhibitors
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) inhibitors included quinidine and paroxetine. A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.
12 Weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whose Dose Was Increased From 4 mg to 8 mg
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
A treatment-related adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to fesoterodine fumarate in a participant who received fesoterodine fumarate. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate was assessed by the investigator.
12 Weeks
Satisfaction Rate
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
Satisfaction rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who were satisfied by fesoterodine fumarate treatment over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Satisfaction scale was assessed by the participants according to the following categories: (1) satisfied, (2) unsatisfied, (3) uncertain, or (4) unconfirmed.
12 Weeks
Change From Baseline in the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks
Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) was defined as the sum score (0 to 15) of the following four OAB symptoms: daytime frequency (2 at maximum), nighttime frequency (3 at maximum), urgency (5 at maximum), and urgency incontinence (5 at maximum). Higher score indicates worse symptoms. Mean change from baseline in the OABSS at 12 weeks was presented along with the corresponding standard deviation.
Baseline, 12 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 19, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 19, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 3, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 14, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • A0221096

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings