Preventing Depression in People With Epilepsy: an Extension of Project UPLIFT
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Rollins School of Public Health
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- University of Michigan
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- University of Texas Health Science Center
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
- University of Washington
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of epilepsy
- at least three months post initial diagnosis of epilepsy and either on medication or permission of the physician
- symptoms of depression, but absence of moderate-to-severe depression, (8 < CES-D < 27)
- 21 years of age and older
- English speaking
- had access to a telephone
- mentally stable, as determined by a score of > 26 on the Telephone Mini-Mental Status Exam (T-MMSE)
- willing to participate
- willing to complete assessments three times
Exclusion Criteria:
- no diagnosis of epilepsy
- less than 3 months since diagnosis of epilepsy
- no depressive symptom (CES-D <8)
- severe depression (CES-D > 27)
- suicidal ideation
- previous participation in Project UPLIFT
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Project UPLIFT (Treatment)
Participants randomly assigned to the Treatment group receive the UPLIFT Intervention immediately after completing the Baseline Assessment.
Participants can chose to participate in the Web- or phone-delivery of UPLIFT.
|
Developed for home-based treatment of depression in people with epilepsy, Project UPLIFT is based upon Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for depression.
It includes 8 modules, group-delivered by either telephone or Web.
Trainees and people with epilepsy co-facilitate the groups, supervised by a licensed mental health professional.The co-facilitators are trained and supervised by the Principal Investigator, a Georgia-licensed clinical psychologist and Associate Professor of Behavioral Science and of Epidemiology in public health.
Activities are designed to increase knowledge about depression; monitoring, challenging, and changing thoughts; coping and relaxing; attention and mindfulness; focusing on pleasure; the importance of reinforcement, and preventing relapse.
|
|
Experimental: Project UPLIFT (TAU Waitlist Control)
Participants randomly assigned to the Treatment-as Usual (TAU) Waitlist Control group will also receive the UPLIFT intervention.
However, TAU Waitlist Control participants will begin the Intervention 8 weeks after completing the Baseline Assessment.
During the initial 8 weeks, participants in this group will continue whatever treatment they are currently undergoing to prevent or treat mild depressive symptoms.
Participants can chose to participate in the Web- or phone-delivery of UPLIFT.
|
Developed for home-based treatment of depression in people with epilepsy, Project UPLIFT is based upon Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for depression.
It includes 8 modules, group-delivered by either telephone or Web.
Trainees and people with epilepsy co-facilitate the groups, supervised by a licensed mental health professional.The co-facilitators are trained and supervised by the Principal Investigator, a Georgia-licensed clinical psychologist and Associate Professor of Behavioral Science and of Epidemiology in public health.
Activities are designed to increase knowledge about depression; monitoring, challenging, and changing thoughts; coping and relaxing; attention and mindfulness; focusing on pleasure; the importance of reinforcement, and preventing relapse.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (at 0 week) , Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at16 weeks)
|
Changes in depressive symptoms are measured using the modified Beck Depression Inventory (mBDI).
|
Baseline (at 0 week) , Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at16 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in seizure severity
Time Frame: Baseline (0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
Changes in seizure severity measured using the Liverpool Seizure Severity.
|
Baseline (0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
|
Changes in Depression and Mindfulness Knowledge and Skills
Time Frame: Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
The changes are measured using an internally consistent scale assessing knowledge and skills associated with depression and mindfulness.
The scale includes 18 true-false items assessing knowledge of depression based on the content of the UPLIFT modules.
The scale also includes 13 Likert-scale assessing mindfulness skills based on the content of the UPLIFT modules.
|
Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
|
Changes in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
Changes in depressive symptoms are measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
|
baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
|
Changes in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
Changes in depressive symptoms are measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).
|
baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
|
Changes in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
Changes in depressive symptoms are measured using the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E).
|
baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
|
Change in Seizure Activity
Time Frame: Baseline (0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
Change measured using self-reported number of seizures in the past 4 weeks.
|
Baseline (0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Satisfaction with Life
Time Frame: Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
Changes are measured using the Satisfaction with Life Scale (Denier, E., et al., The satisfaction with life scale.
Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985)
|
Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
|
Changes in Sleep Quality
Time Frame: Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
The study uses the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index to assess changes in sleep quality.
|
Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
|
Changes in Depression Coping Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
The study uses Perraud, S., Development of the Depression Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (DCSES).
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 2000 to assess changes in depression coping self-efficacy.
|
Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
|
Changes in Self Compassion
Time Frame: Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
The study uses Neff, K.D. and R. Vonk, Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: two different ways of relating to oneself.
J Pers, 2009.
77(1): p. 23-50.. to assess changes in self compassion.
|
Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
|
Changes in Physical and Mental Health Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
The study uses the Centers for Disease Control's Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (BRFSS) questionnaire to assess changes in physical and mental health quality of life.
|
Baseline (at 0 week), Interim (at 8 weeks), Follow-up (at 16 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nancy J Thompson, MPH, PhD, Emory University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00026786
- 5RC1MD004563-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- 09042433 (Other Identifier: Other)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.