Vaginal Pessary Versus Expectant Management for Placenta Previa

September 25, 2018 updated by: Pediatrix

Vaginal Pessary Versus Expectant Management for the Prevention of Delivery Prior to 36 Weeks in Women With Placenta Previa

The purpose of this study is to perform a large multi-center randomized trial comparing the role of vaginal pessary versus expectant management in women with placenta previa between 22w0d and 32w0d of gestation in prolonging gestation until ≥36 weeks. Secondary outcomes will assess duration of antepartum admission, total blood loss, gestational age at delivery, type of cesarean delivery, and a composite neonatal outcome. The hypothesis is that the use of a vaginal pessary in patients presenting with placenta previa between 22-32 weeks will decrease delivery prior to 36 weeks as compared to expectantly managing these patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

While the use of pessary in this scenario has not been previously assessed, it is reasonable to infer, from the data for use of pessary to prevent preterm birth, and the data regarding the efficacy of cervical cerclage in reducing bleeding and preterm birth in patients with placenta previa to this clinical conundrum. If cerclage improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with placenta previa, the use of a vaginal pessary should be a less-invasive but similarly efficacious alternative to maintain cervical length. The purpose of this study is to compare two treatment options reasonably used in clinical practice. Use of cervical pessary is not expected to increase antenatal costs beyond the minimal cost of the pessary. Additionally, given the results of the available clinical trials on cerclage maintaining cervical length and decreasing bleeding, this procedure has the potential to decrease the cost of both antepartum admissions for bleeding and neonatal care.

A substantial number of women with placenta previa will not hemorrhage until they reach the third trimester, thus, by allowing for enrollment and pessary placement as late as 32w0d, the intervention may be applied to the broadest "at risk" population. As previously mentioned literature on the use of cerclage in patients with placenta previa and short cervix are limited by a reduced number of eligible subjects and concern over safety issues has not been assuaged by these small studies. As pessary placement appears to carry little if any risk based on a number of published studies, eligibility can be expanded to any cervical length.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
17

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36617
        • University of South Alabama Medical Center
    • California
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90801-1428
        • Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
      • San Jose, California, United States, 95008
        • Good Samaritan Hospital
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
        • Presbyterian/St Luke's Hospital
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 95008
        • Denver Health and Hospital Authority
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • Norton Kosair Children's Hospital
    • Louisiana
      • Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70001
        • Tulane - Lakeside Hospital for Women and Children
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
        • Touro Infirmary
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor/Texas Children's Hospital & Pavilion
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122-4307
        • Swedish Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 54 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant age 18 years or older
  • Gestational age between 22w0d and 32w0d, inclusive, at time of enrollment
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Complete Placenta Previa
  • Intact Membranes
  • No allergies to material in pessary
  • Plan to deliver at PI's hospital
  • Informed consent obtained, signed/dated

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active preterm labor
  • Nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing
  • Intrauterine fetal death
  • Active bleeding (may be enrolled if hemostatic >48 hours)
  • Ruptured membranes
  • Any fetal condition likely to cause serious neonatal morbidity independent of gestational age: Fetal malformation likely to require surgery, Fetal malformation involving vital organs, Fetal viral infection, Hydrops fetalis,
  • Known Uterine Anomaly
  • Cervical Cerclage present at time of enrollment
  • Maternal condition that warrant continued hospitalization (example severe preeclampsia, Diabetes out of control, maternal heart disease)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Cervical Pessary Placement
For the patients assigned to receive a cervical pessary, they will be evaluated and fitted for a pessary by the physician within 3-4 days unless exclusion criteria develop. After it is placed she will be evaluated for comfort. She will be asked to leave it in at all times but informed that removal and withdrawal from the study is always her option.
Procedure: Cervical Pessary Placement
For the patients assigned to receive a cervical pessary, they will be evaluated and fitted for a pessary by the physician within 3-4 days unless exclusion criteria develop. After it is placed she will be evaluated for comfort. She will be asked to leave it in at all times but informed that removal and withdrawal from the study is always her option.
NO_INTERVENTION: Expectant Managment
Each participant will have standard care for placenta previa. This is the same care that a patient with a placenta previa would ordinarily receive even if she were not participating in the trial. The trial's participating investigators agree that the management outlined in this section is standard management for placenta previa.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease Delivery Prior to 36 weeks in patients with a gestational age of 22.0- 32.0 presenting with placenta previa.
Time Frame: day of birth
This outcome, a decrease in the number of delivery that occur before 36 weeks of pregnancy who have a diagnosed placenta previa. The gestational age is noted at the time of birth.
day of birth

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need for packed red blood cells or hematologic product replacement
Time Frame: from birth to 60 days
note the number of blood transfusions the baby received from birth until 60 days post birth
from birth to 60 days
Neonate or Fetal Death
Time Frame: From time of trial entry to 60 days post birth (approximately 34 weeks)
death of fetus or newborn up to 60 days post delivery
From time of trial entry to 60 days post birth (approximately 34 weeks)
Neonatal Outcomes
Time Frame: From Birth to 60 days of Age
Including birthweight, neonatal death, composite neonatal morbidity (any of the following: respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, proven sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, or perinatal death.) and specific neonatal morbidities including: Apgar <3 at 5 min, ICU admission, , cord pH, 7.1.
From Birth to 60 days of Age
Any adverse reactions to the cervical pessary.
Time Frame: from 0 to as many as 18 weeks.
unexpected adverse reaction such as cervical trauma, infection, allergy
from 0 to as many as 18 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pediatrix

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Obstetrix Medical Group

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Irene Stafford, MD, Baylor College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 5, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 14, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OBX0028

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Placenta Previa

Clinical Trials on Cervical Pessary Placement

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings