A Two-part Study in Edoxaban-treated Healthy Subjects to Establish a Punch Biopsy Bleeding Model and to Evaluate the Effect of a 4-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate on Anticoagulation

February 8, 2019 updated by: Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.
This Phase 1 study consists of 2 parts. Part 1 will be an open-label, randomized, 2 treatment, 2-way crossover study. Part 2 will be a double-blind (Sponsor unblinded), randomized, placebo controlled, sequential descending prothrombin complex concentrate dose, 2 sequence, 2 period crossover study. In both parts of the study, the assessor of BD and BV will remain blinded. In Part 2 of the study, both the subject and the clinic staff involved in study conduct will be blinded (with the exception of the pharmacist or nurse who prepares the blinded individual treatments from open-label supplies). The study programmer and statistician will also be blinded to treatment assignment. The Sponsor will remain unblinded for both parts of the study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66211
        • Quintiles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy subjects between 18 and 45 years of age, with a body mass index between 18 and 30 kg/m2, and weighing ≤ 110 kg.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women of childbearing potential without proper contraceptive measures and women who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Women of childbearing potential who participate in the study must agree to use proper contraceptive measures from screening through 13 weeks after the last dose of study drug.
  • Subjects with history of unexplained syncope. Subjects who have prior clearance of vasovagal events may be included.
  • Subjects who have used any drugs or substances known to be strong inhibitors or strong inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5 enzymes or P-glycoprotein within 28 days prior to the first dosing.
  • Subjects who have used any other nonprescription drugs (including herbal supplemental), except acetaminophen (up to 3 g/day) within 14 days prior to check-in.
  • Subjects with history of major bleeding, major trauma, or major surgical procedure of any type within 6 months of dosing.
  • Subjects with history of peptic ulcer, gastrointestinal bleeding (including hematemesis, melena, and rectal bleeding), or bleeding from hemorrhoids.
  • Subjects with history of minor bleeding episodes such as epistaxis, rectal bleeding (spots of blood on toilet paper), and gingival bleeding within 3 months before the first dose.
  • Subjects who have any family history, suspected or documented, of coagulopathy.
  • Subjects who have participated in a previous edoxaban study within 6 months prior to the first dose.
  • Subjects who used anticoagulants (eg, warfarin, low molecular weight heparin), antiplatelet agents (eg, clopidogrel), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and/or acetylsalicylic acid 30 days prior to punch biopsy or who expect to use these during the study.
  • Subjects with hemoglobin levels below 12 g/dL (men) or 11 g/dL (women) at screening.
  • Subjects with creatinine clearance ≤ 80 mL/min (based on the Cockcroft-Gault equation).
  • Subjects who are considered inappropriate for the punch biopsy procedure based on inability to visualize surface blood vessels, and history or likelihood of forming keloid scars.
  • Subjects with known heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
  • Subjects who have a platelet count, PT, or INR outside of the normal range at baseline.
  • Subjects with history or current evidence of clinically significant cardiac, hepatic, renal, pulmonary, endocrine, neurologic, infectious, gastrointestinal, hematologic, or oncologic disease as determined by screening history, physical examination, laboratory test results, or 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG).

In addition, for Part 2:

  • Subjects who are deficient in Factor V Leiden mutation.
  • Subjects who are deficient in protein S, protein C, antithrombin, or factor II, or have prothrombin 20210A mutation.
  • Subjects with known anaphylactic or severe systemic reactions to Beriplex P/N or any components in Beriplex P/N including heparin; FII, FVII, FIX, and FX; proteins C and S; antithrombin III; and human albumin.
  • Subjects with current or history of disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Part 1 - 60mg edoxaban
Treatment A: single oral dose of 60 mg edoxaban (1 × 60 mg tablet)
Drug: 60mg edoxaban
Experimental: Part 1 - 180mg edoxaban
Treatment B: single oral dose of 180 mg edoxaban (3 × 60 mg tablet)
Drug: 180mg edoxaban
Experimental: Part 2 - 60mg edoxaban and 50 IU/kg Beriplex P/N
Dose cohort 1: 60 mg edoxaban + 50 IU/kg Beriplex P/N in 1 period and placebo (0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP), in the other period
Drug: 60mg edoxaban
Drug: 50 IU/kg Beriplex P/N
Experimental: Part 2 - 60mg edoxaban and 20 IU/kg Beriplex P/N
Dose cohort 2: 60 mg edoxaban + 25 IU/kg Beriplex P/N in 1 period and placebo (0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP), in the other period
Drug: 60mg edoxaban
Drug: 25 IU/kg Beriplex P/N
Experimental: Part 2 - 60mg edoxaban and 10 IU/kg Beriplex P/N
Dose cohort 3: 60 mg edoxaban + 10 IU/kg Beriplex P/N in 1 period and placebo (0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP), in the other period
Drug: 60mg edoxaban
Drug: 10 IU/kg Beriplex P/N

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding duration 60mg edoxaban
Time Frame: Day 1
To assess the variability and effect size of bleeding duration (BD) following punch biopsy in healthy subjects administered 60 mg edoxaban
Day 1
Bleeding volume 60mg edoxaban
Time Frame: Day 1
To assess the variability and effect size of bleeding volume (BV) following punch biopsy in healthy subjects administered 60 mg edoxaban
Day 1
Bleeding duration 180mg edoxaban
Time Frame: Day 1
To assess the variability and effect size of bleeding duration (BD) following punch biopsy in healthy subjects administered 180 mg edoxaban
Day 1
Bleeding volume 180mg edoxaban
Time Frame: Day 1
To assess the variability and effect size of bleeding volume (BV) following punch biopsy in healthy subjects administered 180 mg edoxaban
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prothrombin Time
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate the reversal of the effect of 60 mg edoxaban on Prothrombin Time (PT), International Normalized Ratio (INR), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), and Thrombin Generation Assay (TGA) parameters by Beriplex P/N
Day 1
International Normalized Ratio
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate the reversal of the effect of 60 mg edoxaban on Prothrombin Time (PT), International Normalized Ratio (INR), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), and Thrombin Generation Assay (TGA) parameters by Beriplex P/N
Day 1
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate the reversal of the effect of 60 mg edoxaban on Prothrombin Time (PT), International Normalized Ratio (INR), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), and Thrombin Generation Assay (TGA) parameters by Beriplex P/N
Day 1
Thrombin Generation Assay
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate the reversal of the effect of 60 mg edoxaban on Prothrombin Time (PT), International Normalized Ratio (INR), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), and Thrombin Generation Assay (TGA) parameters by Beriplex P/N
Day 1
procoagulant markers D dimer
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate the effects of Beriplex P/N following 60 mg edoxaban on the procoagulant markers D dimer and prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 (F1 + 2)
Day 1
prothrombin fragment F1 + 2
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate the effects of Beriplex P/N following 60 mg edoxaban on the procoagulant markers D dimer and prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 (F1 + 2)
Day 1
coagulation factor concentrations
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate the effects of Beriplex P/N following 60 mg edoxaban on coagulation factor concentrations
Day 1
cmax of edoxaban and its active metabolite, D21-2393
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate single dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of edoxaban and its active metabolite, D21-2393
Day 1
tmax of edoxaban and its active metabolite, D21-2393
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate single dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of edoxaban and its active metabolite, D21-2393
Day 1
AUC 0-24 of edoxaban and its active metabolite, D21-2393
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate single dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of edoxaban and its active metabolite, D21-2393
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 2, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DU176b-A-U158

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and applicable supporting clinical trial documents may be available upon request at https://vivli.org/. In cases where clinical trial data and supporting documents are provided pursuant to our company policies and procedures, Daiichi Sankyo will continue to protect the privacy of our clinical trial participants. Details on data sharing criteria and the procedure for requesting access can be found at this web address: https://vivli.org/ourmember/daiichi-sankyo/

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Studies for which the medicine and indication have received European Union (EU) and United States (US), and/or Japan (JP) marketing approval on or after 01 January 2014 or by the US or EU or JP Health Authorities when regulatory submissions in all regions are not planned and after the primary study results have been accepted for publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Formal request from qualified scientific and medical researchers on IPD and clinical study documents from clinical trials supporting products submitted and licensed in the United States, the European Union and/or Japan from 01 January 2014 and beyond for the purpose of conducting legitimate research. This must be consistent with the principle of safeguarding study participants' privacy and consistent with provision of informed consent.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings