Comparative Study of a Smartphone-Linked Self-Monitoring System Versus a Traditional One for Improving Metabolic Control and Compliance to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (iNew Trend)

April 13, 2016 updated by: Sanofi

Comparative Efficacy of iBGStar Glucose Meter vs. Traditional Glucose Monitoring in Improving Metabolic Control and Compliance Towards Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Young Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of iBGstar as a component of the diabetes treatment vs. traditional blood glucose self-monitoring system for improving glycemic control after 6 months in young patients with type 1 diabetes. The study is intended also to demonstrate the superiority of iBGStar as a component of the diabetes treatment vs. usual blood glucose self-monitoring system for improving the compliance to self monitoring of blood glucose after 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The planned study duration will be 20 months (5 quarters) with screening/enrollment of 7 months, followed by 2-3 weeks of a qualification phase, a 6 month experimental phase, plus a 6 month follow-up in the post-trial observational phase.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
186

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Milano, Italy
        • Sanofi -Aventis Administrative Office

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 24 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Males and females
  • Age between 14-24 years
  • Any diabetes duration
  • Cared for by the diabetes center for at least 1 year
  • HbA1c ≥ 8%
  • Basal bolus treatment (any insulin)
  • Poor compliance with Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (less than 30% of the recommended Blood Glucose measurements recorded in the glucose meter in the two previous weeks, i.e. <16 Blood Glucose measurements in the last two weeks)
  • Written informed consent obtained from patient or legal representative (for minor)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with other insulin regimen or Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
  • Refusal or inability to give informed consent to participate in the study
  • Patients with short life expectancy
  • Patients with conditions/concomitant diseases making them non evaluable for the primary efficacy endpoint according to physician's judgment
  • Requirement for concomitant treatment that could bias primary evaluation
  • Patients with high likelihood of being unavailable for 6 and/or 12 months visits
  • Subject is the investigator, sub-investigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, other study site staff or relative of study site staff thus considered directly involved in the conduct of the study
  • Current addition/abuse of alcohol or drugs
  • Severe visual or dexterity impairment
  • Patients with any mental condition rendering them unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Subjects unlikely or unable to comply with the Protocol requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: iBGStar (Group A)
Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose will be managed with iBGStar and iBGStar Diabetes Manager Application (App) uploaded on iPhone for all duration of the study (6 months of experimental phase plus 6-months of observational phase). In the first 3 months, the patients in Group A will send their glycemic test values and notes by mail to the physician through Diabetes Manager App every 2 weeks. Afterwards until the visit V2 (six months), the patients in Group A will send their glycemic test values and notes by mail monthly. 9 reports in total.
Device: iBGStar
Active Comparator: Traditional Glucometer (Group B)
Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose will be managed with a traditional glucometer according to usual care for the first 6 months (experimental phase). In the 6 months post-trial follow-up (observational phase), Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose will be managed with iBGStar and iBGStar Diabetes Manager App.
Device: Traditional Glucometer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in HbA1c levels from baseline
Time Frame: baseline to six months
baseline to six months
Proportion of participants performing at least 30% of the recommended Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose tests after 6 months from randomization
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of participants with HbA1c ≤7.5%
Time Frame: at 6 months and 12 months
at 6 months and 12 months
Average number of recommended Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose tests daily, weekly, and monthly
Time Frame: at 6 months and 12 months
at 6 months and 12 months
Mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial glucose (PPG)
Time Frame: at 6 months and 12 months
at 6 months and 12 months
Mean Glycemic Variability
Time Frame: at 6 months and 12 months
at 6 months and 12 months
Average Insulin Dose
Time Frame: at 6 months and 12 months
at 6 months and 12 months
Number of Daily Injections
Time Frame: at 6 months and 12 months
at 6 months and 12 months
Number of Insulin Dose Adjustments
Time Frame: at 6 months and 12 months
at 6 months and 12 months
Quality of life: Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQOL) (young adults 18-24 years)
Time Frame: at 6 months and 12 months
at 6 months and 12 months
Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL-Y) (adolescents 14-17 years)
Time Frame: at 6 months and 12 months
at 6 months and 12 months
Participants satisfaction with SMBG meter assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: at 6 months and 12 months
at 6 months and 12 months
Number overall contacts between centers and participants
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Type of overall contacts between centers and participants
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sanofi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 13, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IBGST_L_05971

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings