Pre-emptive Kidney Transplantation Quality of Life (PreKiTQoL)
Evaluation of the Benefits Associated With Pre-emptive Kidney Transplantation. Prospective, Multicenter and Controlled Study of Quality of Life, Psychological Adjustment Processes and Medical Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Pre-emptive Kidney Transplant Compared to a Similar Population of Recipients After a Dialysis Period of Less Than Three Years
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Emmanuelle PAPUCHON
- Phone Number: +33 02 40 08 77 82
- Email: emmanuelle.papuchon@chu-nantes.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Lyon, France, 69437
- CHU LYON - Hôpitla E. Herriot - Médecine de transplantation et immunoclinique
-
Marseille, France, 13005
- CHU MARSEILLE - Hôpital de la Conception - Santé Publique
-
Nantes, France, 44093
- CHU NANTES - Hôtel Dieu-Jean Monnet - ITUN
-
Nice, France, 06002
- CHU NICE - Service de Néphrologie
-
Toulouse, France, 61059
- CHU TOULOUSE - Hôpitalt Rangueil - Service de Néphrologie
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients with a pre-emptive transplantation from deceased and living donor and patients who have experienced a pre-transplant dialysis period of less than 36 months (matched inclusion on recipient gender and center).
- Only first and single kidney transplantation will be considered.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Re-transplantation or simultaneous transplantation (kidney-pancreas for instance)
- Patients under guardianship.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
PPT
Patients with a pre-emptive kidney transplantation from deceased or living donors
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes completion every six months prior to surgery, at hospital discharge, and at 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months
|
|
PDT
Patients who have experienced a pre-transplant dialysis period of less than 36 months
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes completion every six months prior to surgery, at hospital discharge, and at 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
The change in quality of life, taking into account psychological adjustment of the patient (response shift). This criterion will be measured by a specifically developed questionnaire : ReTransQol |
through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
KTFS (Kidney Transplant Failure Score )
Time Frame: 12 month
|
The Kidney Transplant Failure Score (KTFS) at one year post transplantation will be compared between PPT versus PDT.
|
12 month
|
|
Post-transplantation time to return to work
Time Frame: 24 month
|
24 month
|
|
|
Generic quality of life
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
Generic QoL will be assessed with the SF36 every 6 months prior to surgery, at hospital discharge and at 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months and compared between PPT versus PDT.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
|
Anxiety and depressive disorders
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
Anxiety and depressive disorders will be assessed every six months prior to surgery, at hospital discharge, and at 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months and compared between PPT versus PDT using the questionnaire HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale)
|
through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
|
Subjective well-being
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
Subjective well-being will be assessed every six months prior to surgery, at hospital discharge and at 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months and compared between PPT versus PDT using the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS)
|
through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
|
Perceived stress
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
The perceived stress will be assessed every six months prior to surgery, at hospital discharge, and at 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months and compared between PPT versus PDT with the Perceived Stress Scale
|
through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
|
Coping strategies
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
The coping strategies will be assessed at 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months post transplantation and compared between PPT versus PDT with the Brief Cope
|
through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
|
Posttraumatic growth
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
The posttraumatic growth will be assessed at 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months post transplantation and compared between PPT versus PDT with the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI)
|
through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
|
Evolution of the Graft Filtration Rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
The evolution of the Graft Filtration Rate (GFR) will be compared between PPT versus PDT.
This clinical parameter will be collected at hospital discharge, and 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months post-transplantation. Renal function will be estimated using the 4-variables MDRD formula
|
through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
|
Evolution of daily proteinuria level
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
The evolution of the daily proteinuria level will be compared between PPT versus PDT.
This clinical parameter will be collected at hospital discharge, and 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months post-transplantation. Conventionally, proteinuria is diagnosed by a simple dipstick test
|
through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
|
Compliance of patients
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
Compliance of patients will be assessed every six months prior to surgery, at hospital discharge, and at 3, 6,12, 24, 36, 48, 72 months and compared between PPT versus PDT with the Girerd questionnaire
|
through study completion, an average of 5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Véronique SEBILLE, Nantes University Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Aurélie MEURETTE, Nantes University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- RC14_0078
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.