Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1 Alpha as a Novel Biomarker in Septic Shock

October 12, 2016 updated by: University of Florida
The purpose of this research study is to determine if a chemical marker in the blood, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1 alpha), can be used to predict subject's hospital outcomes when the subject is diagnosed with sepsis. Sepsis is defined as either the presence of pathogenic organisms or their toxins in the blood and tissues. Sepsis is one of the most significant challenges in critical care medicine. The investigators propose that hypoxia-induced expression of HIF-1 alpha will correlate with the clinical features of Sepsis and in the future, HIF-1 alpha may be used as a biomarker in Sepsis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Sepsis is one of the most significant challenges in critical care. Septic shock (SS) is the most severe form of sepsis and is associated with higher mortality, significant financial expenses and longer lengths of stay. Pathophysiological mechanisms of SS include 3 key components: 1) bacterial overgrowth, 2) spill of bacterial product into the blood causing hemodynamic insufficiency, and 3) both lead to tissue hypoxia (TH). To date the biomarkers of sepsis/SS are limited to hemodynamic parameters. However, aggressive fluid resuscitation does not fully prevent development of tissue hypoxia (TH). To date the investigators are limited in appreciating TH by measurement of lactic acid (LA), which is neither an early nor an accurate marker. Unfortunately, LA has limited predictive value in SS due to its complex metabolism. Thus, there is an acute need for biomarkers that would aid diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis/septic shock.

Cellular responses/adaptations to hypoxia rely on the transcription hypoxia-inducible factor HIF, a heterodimeric protein composed of a constitutively expressed subunit and an inducible (types 1, 2, and 3) subunit. More recently HIF was identified in diverse tissues including blood; it has been also shown that HIF expression in blood cells is representative of systemic tissues in hypoxic conditions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
63

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Normal healthy controls recruited from the community. Subjects with sepsis admitted to the University of Florida Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Septic patients

  • Age 18 ≤ 80 years
  • Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential
  • Meets two or more of Systemic Inflammatory Response System (SIRS) criteria (tachypnea, tachycardia, hypo/hyperthermia, leukopenia/leukocytosis)
  • Evidence of tissue hypo-perfusion, or organ dysfunction by any of the following
  • Sepsis induced hypotension with systolic blood pressure <90
  • Lactate above 1.5 mmol/Liter
  • Urine output below 0.5 mL/kg/hr for more than 2 hours despite adequate fluid resuscitation
  • Tissue hypoxia
  • Bilirubin > 2 mg/dl in absence of liver cirrhosis
  • Creatinine (CR)> 2.0 mg/dL, Acute Kidney Injury as evident by CR increase by 0.5 mg/dL from baseline
  • Platelet count < 100,000
  • Coagulopathy with international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5

Inclusion: Healthy Controls

  • Age and gender-matched to sepsis patients
  • Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential
  • Never smoker (<1 pack year history)

Exclusion Criteria: Septic patients

  • History of Malignancy, including carcinoma during the preceding 5 years.
  • Recent surgery, within 48 hours, or anticipated surgery within 24 hours
  • Contraindication for neck/chest central venous line
  • History of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to inclusion
  • Transfer from another institution
  • History of cirrhosis
  • Transplant recipient
  • Known HIV
  • Use of ≥ 15 mg prednisone daily or equivalent
  • Severe anemia: hematocrit ≤ 20

Exclusion: Healthy Controls

  • History of Malignancy, including carcinoma during the preceding 5 years.
  • Taking any prescription medications, other than any type of prescribed hormonal birth control.
  • Current smoking history and/or > 1 pack year history
  • Current use (within the last week) anti-inflammatory medications, such as aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen and/or prednisone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Septic patients
Blood Draw Biological samples: The investigators will collect blood and compare the expression of HIF complex in 3 distinct ways: between patients and controls, within the same patient in a time-dependent fashion, and between different patients.
Procedure: Septic patients
The investigators will draw two sets of blood samples. One at baseline, 10 mL, and another, 24 hours later, 10 mL, for a total of 20 mL.
Healthy Control
The investigators will collect blood and compare the expression of HIF complex in 3 distinct ways: between patients and controls, within the same patient in a time-dependent fashion, and between different patients.
Procedure: Healthy Control
The investigators will draw 10 mL, once, during baseline for a total of 10 mL among the healthy control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hypoxia-inducible factor as a predictive biomarker of sepsis.
Time Frame: Baseline,
Hypoxia-inducible factor will be measured at initial diagnosis (baseline) and 24 hours later in subjects with clinical presentation of sepsis and correlated with lactic acidosis.
Baseline,
Hypoxia-inducible factor as a predictive biomarker of sepsis
Time Frame: 24 hours
Hypoxia-inducible factor will be measured at initial diagnosis (baseline) and 24 hours later in subjects with clinical presentation of sepsis and correlated with lactic acidosis.
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the role of HIF complex as biomarker and its correlation with "Survive the Sepsis Campaign 2012" gold standard septic shock severity and morbidity/mortality predictors.
Time Frame: 28 days
At discharge a detailed chart analysis will be performed for the first 24 hrs, survival at 28 day; correlations of clinical course-derived data and serum cytokine content with the HIF content/expression and function will be analyzed by Spearman's rank correlation test.
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Florida

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wael Nasser, MD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 12, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB201200142

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Septic patients

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings