Effect of Pre- and Probiotics on P-cresol Plasma Levels in Patients Bearing a Kidney Allograft

July 1, 2014 updated by: Bruna Guida, Federico II University
The purpose of this study is to establish whether a short treatment with the synbiotic combination Probinul neutro® may decrease the plasma concentration of the uremic toxin p-cresol in patients bearing a kidney allograft. The effect of this treatment on plasma levels of immunosuppressant drugs will be evaluated as well.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Marked alterations in the gut microbiome take place in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) that show an overgrowth of aerobic bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae, Halomonadaceae, Moraxellaceae, and Pseudomonadaceae and a decrease of anaerobic bacteria such as Lactobacillaceae and Prevotellaceae. These changes also occur after kidney transplantation. The dysbiotic microflora produces toxic compounds such as phenols, indoles, and amines that are absorbed through the intestinal mucosa and cause systemic toxicity. Compelling evidence showed the association of one of these compounds, p-cresol and of its main metabolite p-cresylsulfate, to cardiovascular risk and mortality in CKD. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies decreasing the generation or absorption of this uremic toxin are expected to have a favorable impact on the clinical course of the disease. In the present study, the effect of the synbiotic Probinul neutro® on p-cresol concentration in patients bearing a kidney allograft will be evaluated. Synbiotics are associations of prebiotics and probiotics. Probiotics are living microorganisms such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species that are administered to repopulate the gut with a "normal" microflora. Prebiotics are non-digestible food adjuncts that can be selectively fermented by probiotics or by normal intestinal microflora. In synbiotics the prebiotic and probiotic components synergize to restore the normal gut microflora. Indeed, the probiotic and prebiotic components of the synbiotic may both affect the gut microbiome through with different mechanisms. Probiotics contain bacteria that are part of the normal microbiome and are lowered in CKD such as anaerobes of Bifidobacterium sp. and facultative anaerobes of Lactobacillus sp. These bacterial species, unable to convert aromatic aminoacids into p-cresol, may replace by competition the p-cresol-producing bacteria of the dysbiotic microflora because of their ability to release substances toxic for the dysbiotic microflora such as the bacteriocins, and to activate innate and adaptive immunity. Prebiotics, instead, promote the growth of non-p-cresol producing commensal flora, including lactobacilli and bifidobacteria that selectively metabolize the oligosaccharides contained in prebiotic. The combined activity of pre- and probiotic is expected to reduce the production of p-cresol in the gut by decreasing the bacterial species generationg this compound. We recently showed that a short term treatment with Probinul neutro® causes, indeed, a decrease in p-cresol plasma levels in patients with satge III/IV CKD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Naples, Italy, 80131
        • Recruiting
        • Nutrition Unit of the Federico II University of Naples
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bruna Guida, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous renal allograft transplantation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe infections
  • diabetes
  • malignancy
  • history of food intolerance
  • autoimmune disorders
  • severe malnutrition or clinical conditions requiring artificial feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: CONTROL
Patient in the CONTROL arm will receive a powder containing only tapioca-resistant starch comparable in colour, texture and taste to the synbiotic.
Dietary supplement: CONTROL
Placebo will be taken at home for four weeks as 5 g powder packets to be dissolved in water three times a day far from meals.
Other Names:
  • PLACEBO
EXPERIMENTAL: SYNBIOTIC
Patients in this group will receive Probinul neutro® a synbiotic preparation containing (perpacket): lyophilised bacteria (5×109 Lactobacillus plantarum, 2×109 Lactobacillus casei subsp. rhamnosus and 2×109 Lactobacillus gasseri, 1×109 Bifidobacterium infantis and 1×109 Bifidobacterium longum, 1×109 Lactobacillus acidophilus, 1×109 Lactobacillus salivarius and 1×109 Lactobacillus sporogenes and 5×109 Streptococcus thermophilus), prebiotic inulin (2.2 g; VB Beneo Synergy 1) and 1.3 g of tapioca-resistant starch.
Dietary supplement: SYNBIOTIC
Probinul Neutro® will be taken at home for four weeks as 5 g powder packets to be dissolved in water three times a day far from meals.
Other Names:
  • Probinul Neutro®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in p-cresol plasma concentration
Time Frame: one month
Total p-cresol (free and glucurono- or sulpho-conjugates) plasma concentration will be assessed by reverse phase HPLC at baseline, 15 and 30 days after starting synbiotic treatment.
one month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in bowel habits
Time Frame: one month
Defecation frequency or ease, stool shape, upper or lower abdominal pain, frequency of borborygms or flatus will be assessed by asking the patients to fill a a form for the scored evaluation of GI symptoms and stool characteristics
one month
Change in plasma immunosuppressant drug concentration
Time Frame: one month
Plasma concentration of the different immunosuppressant assumed by the patient (mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporin, tacrolimus, everolimus or sirolimus) will be assessed at baseline, 15 and 30 days after the beginning of the study.
one month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Federico II University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bruna Guida, MD, Federico II University of Naples

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2015

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 1, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Syn-Graft Study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings