Renal and Bone Outcome After Switching Tenofovir to Different Antiretroviral Strategies (TDFOUT)

December 28, 2015 updated by: Jose L. Casado, Asociacion para el Estudio de las Enfermedades Infecciosas

A Prospective, Cohort Study of Renal and Bone Outcome After Changing Tenofovir in Patients With Renal Toxicity According to Antiretroviral Strategy

Renal outcome could be different after switching tenofovir to different antiretroviral strategies, in case of renal toxicity. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the importance of renal evolution in these patients, in terms of grade and time to renal improvement, according to the different options after interrupting tenofovir. The aim of this study was to explore the renal outcome after tenofovir according to new antiretroviral regimen.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Renal toxicity has become an important issue in a large number of HIV infected patients receiving a tenofovir-containing regimen. However, there are no data about the best antiretroviral regimen in patients switching tenofovir because of renal toxicity, in time, grade or persistence of renal improvement. Thus, patients with renal toxicity on tenofovir, defined as:

  • a progressive decrease of at least 25% of estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR, by chronic kidney disease-epi equation), or
  • confirmed value of GFR below 60 ml/min in two successive determinations, or
  • proximal tubular renal dysfunction, as indicated by the presence of at least 3 of the following parameters: proteinuria> 150 mg/g; excretion fractional of phosphorus in urine > 20%; glucosuria > 150 mg; or/and tubular proteinuria/albuminuria ratio above 0.4.

who changed to the combination of abacavir plus a third drug, or to a nucleoside analogues-free antiretroviral combination (dual therapy, monotherapy) will be followed for 1 year to establish the time and grade of improvement (defined as the lack of above criteria).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
245

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Hospital Ramon y Cajal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

HIV-infected patients in regular clinical and analytical follow up, receiving a tenofovir-containing regimen

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-infected patients
  • Older than 18 years
  • Receiving a Tenofovir-containing regimen, and with criteria of renal toxicity (see above)
  • Switching the antiretroviral regimen

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Patients receiving prolonged therapy with other nephrotoxic drugs
  • Patients not receiving or interrupting antiretroviral regimen

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Tenofovir switch
Patients switched tenofovir to different antiretroviral regimen according to physicians decision
Other: Tenofovir switch
Patients switched tenofovir to different antiretroviral regimen according to physicians decision

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Renal outcome
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Evolution of renal parameters after switching tenofovir according to antiretroviral drug or regimen used, in terms of GFR (glomerular filtration rate by Chronic Kidney Disease-epidemiological collaboration equation) improvement, increase in excretion fractional of phosphorus in urine, decrease in proteinuria, and in glycosuria. As control group, renal outcome will be evaluated in patients continuing TDF-based therapy
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antiviral efficacy
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Number of patients without virological failure, defined as an HIV RNA level above 37 copies/ml, 48 weeks after the change of tenofovir
48 weeks
Bone mineral density (BMD) changes
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Changes in BMD in the subgroup of patients with two successive BMD measurements, before and after TDF switch, according to baseline risk factors for BMD change (age, body mass index, hypovitaminosis D, secondary hyperparathyroidism), in comparison with patients continuing TDF
48 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antiviral safety
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Number (and percentage) and degree of adverse events, and percentage of therapy withdrawal, according to antiretroviral strategy after the change of tenofovir
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Asociacion para el Estudio de las Enfermedades Infecciosas

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jose L Casado, MD, Asociacion para el Estudio de las Enfermedades Infecciosas

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 28, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TDFOUT
  • 218/12 revised (Other Identifier: CEIC)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Disease

Clinical Trials on Tenofovir switch

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings