Peripheral Nerve Blocks vs Periarticular Local Anesthetic Injection for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Continuous Femoral and Single Injection Sciatic Peripheral Nerve Blocks vs Periarticular Injection With Ropivacaine or Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) on Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic in Rochester
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physiological status I-III
- Patients presenting for unilateral primary total knee replacement.
- No focal neurologic deficit of the surgical lower extremity.
- Cognitively intact with the ability to sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Chronic pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia or complex regional pain syndrome
- History of long term use of daily opioids (>1 months) with oral morphine equivalent (OME) >5mg/day.
- Body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2
- Allergies to medications used in this study such as: fentanyl, hydromorphone, ketorolac, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, local anesthetics, oxycodone, OxyContin, tramadol, ondansetron, droperidol, or dexamethasone, celecoxib
Major systemic medical problems such as:
- Severe renal disorder defined as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <50 units/m2
- Cardiovascular disorders defined as congestive heart failure (CHF) New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV
- Severe hepatic disorder defined as current or past diagnosis of acute/subacute necrosis liver, acute hepatic failure, chronic liver disease, cirrhosis (primary biliary cirrhosis), fatty liver, chronic hepatitis/toxic hepatitis, liver abscess, hepatic coma, hepatorenal syndrome, other disorders of liver.
- Impaired cognitive function or inability to understand the study protocol
- Contraindication to a regional anesthesia technique (e.g., preexisting neuropathy in the operative extremity, coagulopathy [platelets < 100,000, International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.5], refusal, etc.).
- Previous contralateral knee replacement managed with regional or periarticular injection
- Unable to follow-up at the 3 month interval at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota
- Pregnancy or breast feeding (women of child-bearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Peripheral Nerve Block (PNB)
This group received a continuous femoral nerve block and a single injection sciatic nerve block consisting of the following: Peripheral nerve blocks with Bupivacaine.
|
Subjects received Bupivacaine 0.5% preoperatively, then Bupivacaine 0.2% upon post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival via femoral nerve block, then Bupivacaine 0.25% via single-injection sciatic nerve.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Ropivacaine (PAI-R)
This group received intra articular injection with Ropivacaine, a total volume of 120 milliliters (mL) injected in the periarticular structures by the surgeon.
Following the current, standardized practice for periarticular infiltration, approximately 30 - 40 mL of solution was injected into the posterior capsule just prior to cementing the implants in place and 40 - 50 mL of solution injected into the medial and lateral retinaculum while the cement was hardening and prior to deflation of the tourniquet.
The remaining volume of approximately 40 mL was injected into the quadriceps tendon and subcutaneous tissue prior to skin closure.
|
Subjects received an intra articular injection with Ropivacaine, a total volume of 120 milliliters (mL) injected in the periarticular structures by the surgeon.
Ropivacaine dose depended upon body weight: 50-74.9
kg: 200 mg, 75-99.9
kg: 300 mg, 100-125 kg: 400 mg.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Liposomal Bupivacaine (PAI-L)
This group received Intra articular injection with liposomal bupivacaine, a total volume of 120 milliliters (mL) injected in the periarticular structures by the surgeon.
Following the current, standardized practice for periarticular infiltration, approximately 30 - 40 mL of solution was injected into the posterior capsule just prior to cementing the implants in place and 40 - 50 mL of solution injected into the medial and lateral retinaculum while the cement was hardening and prior to deflation of the tourniquet.
The remaining volume of approximately 40 mL was injected into the quadriceps tendon and subcutaneous tissue prior to skin closure.
|
Subjects received an intra articular injection with liposomal bupivacaine, a total volume of 120 mL injected in the periarticular structures by the surgeon.
Patients weighing 50-125 kg received 266mg of Liposomal Bupivacaine.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Pain Post-Operative Day (POD) 1 (Morning)
Time Frame: Post-Operative Day 1, approximately 6 am to 12:00 pm
|
Pain was measured on a 1-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS) with 0=no pain, and 10=worst pain imaginable.
|
Post-Operative Day 1, approximately 6 am to 12:00 pm
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Average Pain Post-Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Time Frame: Post-operative Day 0, approximately 12 pm to 12 am
|
Pain was measured on a 1-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS) with 0=no pain, and 10=worst pain imaginable.
|
Post-operative Day 0, approximately 12 pm to 12 am
|
|
Maximum Pain Post-PACU
Time Frame: Post-operative Day 0, approximately 12 pm to 12 am
|
Pain was measured on a 1-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS) with 0=no pain, and 10=worst pain imaginable.
|
Post-operative Day 0, approximately 12 pm to 12 am
|
|
Average Pain POD 1 (24 Hours)
Time Frame: POD 1, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
Pain was measured on a 1-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS) with 0=no pain, and 10=worst pain imaginable.
|
POD 1, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
|
Maximum Pain POD 1 (24 Hours)
Time Frame: POD 1, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
Pain was measured on a 1-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS) with 0=no pain, and 10=worst pain imaginable.
|
POD 1, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
|
Average Pain POD 2 (24 Hours)
Time Frame: POD 2, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
Pain was measured on a 1-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS) with 0=no pain, and 10=worst pain imaginable.
|
POD 2, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
|
Maximum Pain POD 2 (24 Hours)
Time Frame: POD 2, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
Pain was measured on a 1-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS) with 0=no pain, and 10=worst pain imaginable.
|
POD 2, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
|
Preoperative Daily Opioid Use
Time Frame: baseline
|
Opioid consumption will be documented in the patient electronic medical record by the nursing staff caring for the patient.
|
baseline
|
|
Intraoperative Opioid Use
Time Frame: During the procedure, approximately 2 hours after start of the procedure
|
Opioid consumption was documented in the patient electronic medical record by the nursing staff caring for the patient.
|
During the procedure, approximately 2 hours after start of the procedure
|
|
PACU Opioid Use
Time Frame: Approximately 2 hours after entry in PACU
|
Opioid consumption was documented in the patient electronic medical record by the nursing staff caring for the patient.
|
Approximately 2 hours after entry in PACU
|
|
POD 0 Post-PACU Opioid Use
Time Frame: POD 0, approximately 12 pm to 12 am
|
Additional opioid medications that were taken by subjects (recorded at the same time as the time points for measuring pain).
Opioid consumption was documented in the patient electronic medical record by the nursing staff caring for the patient.
|
POD 0, approximately 12 pm to 12 am
|
|
POD 1 Opioid Use
Time Frame: POD 1, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
Additional opioid medications that were taken by subjects (recorded at the same time as the time points for measuring pain).
Opioid consumption was documented in the patient electronic medical record by the nursing staff caring for the patient.
|
POD 1, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
|
POD 2 Opioid Use
Time Frame: POD 2, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
Additional opioid medications that were taken by subjects (recorded at the same time as the time points for measuring pain).
Opioid consumption was documented in the patient electronic medical record by the nursing staff caring for the patient.
|
POD 2, approximately 12 am to 12 am next day
|
|
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: Approximately 3 days
|
The hospital length of stay was measured from the date of admittance until the date of discharge.
|
Approximately 3 days
|
|
Balance Testing on Operative Leg Using Unipedal Stance Time
Time Frame: baseline, approximately 12 weeks
|
In order to measure clinical balance, unipedal stance time (UST) was collected as an indicator of balance and fall risk.
Timing (in seconds) began upon withdrawal of support and continued until the uplifted foot returned to the floor, the subject required support, or if the subject reached a time limit of 30 seconds.
The best performance of three repetitions was recorded for analysis.
Normative values for the UST are available.
A UST threshold of 30 seconds yields a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 58% in identifying those with a history of falls.
The first five seconds of unipedal stance is indicative of dynamic balance; inability to maintain unipedal stance for five seconds is a significant predictor of injurious falls.
|
baseline, approximately 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sandra Kopp, MD, Mayo Clinic
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 14-002083
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.