Coronally Advanced Flap With Two Different Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions

August 28, 2014 updated by: Guilherme Barrella, Paulista University

Coronally Advanced Flap With Two Different Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions: A Split-mouth RCT

This study compared the clinical outcomes of coronally advanced flap using two different surgical strategies in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The objective of this split-mouth, randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical outcomes of coronally advanced flap (CAF) using two different surgical strategies in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. Recessions were randomly treated according to a split-mouth design by means of: CAF with oblique interdental incisions (OBL technique) or CAF with horizontal interdental incisions (HOR technique). Marginal gingival recession (REC), clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket probing depth (PPD), height of keratinized tissue (HKT) and thickness of keratinized tissue (TKT) were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Patient-centered outcomes concerning morbidity and improvement in the esthetic appearance were recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Systemically healthy subjects
  • Patients should have bilateral Class I and II MGRs (Miller 1985) in maxillary tooth (at least three recession-type defects affecting adjacent teeth in each side of the maxilla).
  • At least 20 teeth and no sites with attachment loss and probing pocket depth (PPD) > 3 mm.
  • Full-mouth plaque and bleeding on probing of < 20%.
  • Involved tooth should present tooth vitality, absence of caries, restorations or extensive non-carious cervical lesion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of smoking.
  • Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory therapies in the previous 2 months.
  • Previous mucogingival surgery at the region to be treated
  • Systemic conditions that could affect tissue healing (e.g. diabetes).
  • Use of orthodontic appliances.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Horizontal incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using horizontal interdental incisions. An initial horizontal incision was made slightly coronal to the CEJ from the distal to the mesial papilla of the teeth with the recessions. A second incision, 1 to 2 mm apart and parallel to the first incision, was made apically. A sulcular incision was made to link the second incisions and the blade was inserted extending beyond the mucogingival junction, to create a uniform split-thickness flap. The tissue between the two incisions was partially removed to obtain a uniform receptor site that permitted primary closure. Approximation sutures to place the edge of the flap at the base of the remaining papilla were performed.
Procedure: Horizontal incisions
Performed by using horizontal interdental incisions. An initial horizontal incision was made slightly coronal to the CEJ from the distal to the mesial papilla of the teeth with the recessions. A second incision, 1 to 2 mm apart and parallel to the first incision, was made apically. A sulcular incision was made to link the second incisions and the blade was inserted (2 to 3 mm) extending beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ), to create a uniform split-thickness flap. The tissue between the two incisions was partially removed to obtain a uniform receptor site that permitted primary closure. Approximation sutures to place the edge of the flap at the base of the remaining papilla were performed. Passive closure of the wound margins without tension was achieved with interrupted coaptation.
Procedure: Oblique incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using oblique incisions in interdental areas, according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli & De Sanctis (2000). Oblique submarginal interdental incisions were performed and continued with the intrasulcular incisions at the recession defects, resulting in a envelop flap that was raised with a split-full-split approach in the coronal-apical direction. During coronal advancement, each surgical papilla was dislocated with respect to the de-epithelized anatomic papilla by the oblique incisions. Interrupted sutures were performed to stabilize single surgical papilla over the interdental connective tissue bed.
Experimental: Oblique incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using oblique incisions in interdental areas, according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli & De Sanctis (2000). Oblique submarginal interdental incisions were performed and continued with the intrasulcular incisions at the recession defects, resulting in a envelop flap that was raised with a split-full-split approach in the coronal-apical direction. During coronal advancement, each surgical papilla was dislocated with respect to the de-epithelized anatomic papilla by the oblique incisions. Interrupted sutures were performed to stabilize single surgical papilla over the interdental connective tissue bed.
Procedure: Horizontal incisions
Performed by using horizontal interdental incisions. An initial horizontal incision was made slightly coronal to the CEJ from the distal to the mesial papilla of the teeth with the recessions. A second incision, 1 to 2 mm apart and parallel to the first incision, was made apically. A sulcular incision was made to link the second incisions and the blade was inserted (2 to 3 mm) extending beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ), to create a uniform split-thickness flap. The tissue between the two incisions was partially removed to obtain a uniform receptor site that permitted primary closure. Approximation sutures to place the edge of the flap at the base of the remaining papilla were performed. Passive closure of the wound margins without tension was achieved with interrupted coaptation.
Procedure: Oblique incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using oblique incisions in interdental areas, according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli & De Sanctis (2000). Oblique submarginal interdental incisions were performed and continued with the intrasulcular incisions at the recession defects, resulting in a envelop flap that was raised with a split-full-split approach in the coronal-apical direction. During coronal advancement, each surgical papilla was dislocated with respect to the de-epithelized anatomic papilla by the oblique incisions. Interrupted sutures were performed to stabilize single surgical papilla over the interdental connective tissue bed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Marginal gingival recession to 6 months
Time Frame: baseline, and at 3 and 6 months post-surgery
baseline, and at 3 and 6 months post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
height of keratinized tissue
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Baseline, 3 and 6 months
thickness of keratinized tissue
Time Frame: baseline, 3 and 6 months
baseline, 3 and 6 months
Clinical attachment level
Time Frame: baseline, 3 and 6 months
baseline, 3 and 6 months
Probing deph
Time Frame: baseline, 3 and 6 months
baseline, 3 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Paulista University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Suzana Pimentel, PHD, Paulista University
  • Study Chair: Guilherme Barrella, MS, Paulista University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 1, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 1, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • U1111-1158-9611

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings