Safety and Efficacy of Ingenol Mebutate 0.05% Gel When Used After Cryotherapy in the Hypertrophic Actinic Keratoses

March 15, 2017 updated by: Gary Goldenberg, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

An Investigator-Initiated Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Ingenol Mebutate 0.05% Gel When Used After Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Actinic Keratoses (AK) on Dorsal Hands

Sequential therapy with cryosurgery and ingenol mebutate may optimize the treatment of hypertrophic AKs and also treat non-hypertrophic AKs in this anatomic location. Furthermore, use of ingenol mebutate will also be evaluated for potential treatment of subclinical lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators plan to treat 30 subjects. Each qualifying subject will have at least 3 hypertrophic AKs, defined as more than 3mm in thickness, on each dorsal hand. Cryotherapy will be standardized in all patients and for all treated lesions: 1-2 sprays, 5 seconds each, with a 5 second interval. All subjects will be treated with the same cryo-spray. Following cryotherapy, subjects will be randomized to treat either their right or left dorsal hand with ingenol mebutate gel. The decision to treat the right vs. the left hand will be chosen by chance, like flipping a coin. Neither the subject nor the study doctor will choose what arm receives the ingenol mebutate gel. The study doctor will not know which arm is treated with ingenol mebutate, so the subject should not reveal that information to him or her at any time during the study. Subjects will treat the randomized dorsal hand with ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel starting on the same day as the cryotherapy (Day 0). Subjects will utilize the once daily for two days regimen. Subjects will be followed on day 4 after their initial visit, day 8, day 15, day 29, and day 57, with a two day window period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 11370
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults at least 18 years old.
  • Subjects must be in good general health as confirmed by the medical history.
  • Subjects must be able to read, sign, and understand the informed consent
  • Prior to cryosurgery, subjects have at least 3 hypertrophic actinic keratoses on each dorsal hand.
  • Subject must be willing to forego any other treatments on the dorsum of the hands, including tanning bed use and excessive sun exposure while in the study.
  • Subject is willing and able to participate in the study as an outpatient, making frequent visits to the study center during the treatment and follow-up periods and to comply with all study requirements including concomitant medication and other treatment restrictions.
  • If subject is a female of childbearing potential she must have a negative urine pregnancy test result prior to study treatment initiation and must agree to use an approved method of birth control while enrolled in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a history of melanoma anywhere on the body.
  • Subjects with an unstable medical condition as deemed by the clinical investigator.
  • Subjects with non-melanoma skin cancer on the dorsum of the hands.
  • Subjects with any dermatologic disease in the treatment area that may be exacerbated by the treatment proposed or that might impair the evaluation of AKs.
  • Subjects who have previously been treated with ingenol mebutate: on the dorsum of the hands in the past 6 months; or outside of the study area within the past 30 days.
  • Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the study period.
  • Subjects who have experienced a clinically important medical event within 90 days of the visit (e.g., stroke, myocardial infarction, etc).
  • Subjects who have active chemical dependency or alcoholism as assessed by the investigator.
  • Subjects who have known allergies to any excipient in the study gel.
  • Subjects who are currently participating in another clinical study or have completed another clinical study with an investigational drug or device on the study area within 30 days prior to study treatment initiation.

  • Subjects who have received any of the following within 90 days prior to study treatment initiation:

    • interferon or interferon inducers
    • cytotoxic drugs
    • immunomodulators or immunosuppressive therapies (inhaled/ intranasal steroids are permitted)
    • oral or parenteral corticosteroids
    • topical corticosteroids if greater than 2 gm/day
    • any dermatologic procedures or surgeries on the study area (including any AK treatments)
  • Subjects who have used any topical prescription medications on the study area within 30 days prior to study treatment initiation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Combination Therapy
Cryotherapy followed by Ingenol Mebutate Gel
Drug: Ingenol Mebutate
Ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel
Other Names:
  • PEP005 Gel
Procedure: Cryotherapy
1-2 sprays, 5 seconds each, with a 5 second interval
Active Comparator: Cryotherapy Alone
Cryotherapy only
Procedure: Cryotherapy
1-2 sprays, 5 seconds each, with a 5 second interval

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of Combination Therapy vs Cryotherapy Alone
Time Frame: Day 57
To evaluate the safety of cryotherapy plus ingenol mebutate on dorsal hands and compare it to the safety of cryotherapy alone looking at Adverse Events.
Day 57

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Number of All Actinic Keratoses
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 57
To evaluate and compare the mean reduction in number of all AKs (hypertrophic and non-hypertrophic) on the dorsal hands of the combination cryotherapy- ingenol mebutate treated side vs. the cryotherapy alone side on Day 57 as compared to baseline
Baseline and Day 57
Change in Actinic Keratoses by Anatomic Site
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 57
To evaluate the number of AKs (both hypertrophic and non-hypertrophic) before therapy by anatomic site (dorsal hand) at Day 57 as compared to baseline
Baseline and Day 57

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
LEO Pharma

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 15, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GCO 13-0142

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings