Evaluation of Non-Inferiority of Two Fast Follower Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (FIND)

December 8, 2017 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Evaluation of Non-Inferiority of Two Fast Follower Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Comparison to Geneexpert MTB/RIF

Assess sensitivity and specificity of two nucleic acid amplification tests, namely Epistem Genedrive® and MolbioTruenat™ in raw sputum compared to the WHO-endorsed GeneXpert® MTB/RIF assay using a gold standard of four cultures

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  • Estimate the accuracy of the Epistem Genedrive® and MolbioTruenat™ in raw sputum and in sputum pellets.
  • Assess the operational feasibility of Epistem Genedrive® and MolbioTruenat™
  • Determine and compare costs between the Epistem Genedrive®, MolbioTruenat™, and Xpert MTB/RIF tests

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
504

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with clinical suspicion of pulmonary TB.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Clinical suspicion of pulmonary TB (including cough ≥2 weeks and at least 1 other symptom typical of TB);

    • Age 18 years or above;
    • Willingness to have a study follow-up visit, if necessary, approximately two months after enrollment
    • Willingness to provide 3 sputum specimens at enrollment
    • Provision of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Receipt of ≥48 cumulative hours OR three or more doses of anti-TB treatment (defined as combination anti-TB therapy intended to treat active TB) within 60 days prior to completion of sputum collection;

    • Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. mentally impaired)
    • Enrolled individuals who do not provide a first sputum sample of ≥ 2ml and a second and third sputum sample of ≥ 1ml each will be classified as early exclusions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Investigational
• Participants will be asked to provide a total of three sputum samples over Days 1 and 2. The intent is for all samples to be collected before the subject starts any form of TB treatment. The first specimen (S1) should be 2 ml or greater in volume, and the second and third specimens (S2 and S3) should each be 1 ml or greater in volume. On Day 1, each participant will be asked to submit one spot sputum (S1) after enrollment and a second spot sputum after at least 2 hours (S2). Participants will be instructed to come back the following day (Day 2) and provide a third spot sputum (S3). In the event that a participant fails to return on Day 2, S3 may be collected a maximum of 7 days after enrollment, provided that no TB treatment has been initiated.
Other: Epistem Genedrive® and MolBio Truenat™
S1 will undergo direct smear and Epistem Genedrive® (optional for phase 2*) testing, before being homogenized with glass beads and split into three portions for testing with Epistem Genedrive®, MolBio Truenat™ and GeneXpert MTB/Rif® respectively. S2 and S3 will be randomized as to the order of testing using Epistem Genedrive® and MolBio Truenat™.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-inferiority of tests
Time Frame: 4 months
Non-inferiority of Epistem Genedrive® MTB iD Test and MolBio Truenat™ TB Assay to GeneXpert MTB/RIF using a non-inferiority margin of 5% for sensitivity in smear-positive, culture-positive; 7% for overall C+ sensitivity; and 3% for specificity in smear-negative, culture-negatives
4 months
Sensitivity and specificity of Epistem Genedrive® MTB iD
Time Frame: 4 months
Sensitivity and specificity of Epistem Genedrive® MTB iD Test on raw sputum before homogenization, homogenized raw sputum and sputum pellet against a gold standard of concentrated smear and four cultures.
4 months
Sensitivity and specificity of MolBio Truenat™ TB Assay
Time Frame: 4 months
Sensitivity and specificity of MolBio Truenat™ TB Assay on homogenized raw sputum and sputum pellet against a gold standard of concentrated smear and four cultures.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Failure rate for the Epistem Genedrive® system assay and for the MolBio Truenat™ assay
Time Frame: 10 months
Failure rate for the Epistem Genedrive® system assay and for the MolBio Truenat™ assay, expressed as the proportion of tests that require repeating due to an indeterminate or uninterpretable initial result (separately and together for tests performed on raw sputum and sputum pellet
10 months
Training needs for each assay
Time Frame: 10 months
Training needs for each assay assessed objectively by number of hours of training, number of runs required, and successful completion of a proficiency assessment by trainees; training needs also will be assessed subjectively by the trainers and by user questionnaires
10 months
Operational feasibility
Time Frame: 10 months
Operational feasibility will be assessed according to the infrastructure required to support each test, the robustness of the reagents and equipment (any breakdowns, storage requirements or contamination events), and the time it takes to run each test;
10 months
Cost-comparison between assays
Time Frame: 10 months
A cost-comparison between assays assessing the cost per sample run incorporating all costs involved in transport, equipment, reagents, personnel, etc. will be performed.
10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johns Hopkins University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Boston Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 23, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NA_00085221 (Other Identifier: Johns Hopkins University)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings