Deescalating Carbapenems in Hospital Setting (CARBEPARGNE)

February 20, 2017 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Deescalating Carbapenems in Hospital Setting: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Carbapenem Continuation and Switch to Another Beta-lactam for the Treatment of Infections Due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae

The study aims to evaluate a deescalating therapeutic strategy (switch the carbapenem to another beta-lactam for which the isolated pathogen is susceptible) in patients with well-defined ESBL-PE infections (usual sites of infections and non severe infections).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Carbapenems are considered the antibiotics of choice for the treatment of infections due to expanded-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE). Their use is readily increasing because of the pandemic of ESBL-PE. However, the future of these drugs is challenged by the worldwide emergency of new resistance mechanisms in the same pathogens, particularly the carbapenemases. This resistance makes these drugs inactive and gives no therapeutic options for patients. Resistance to carbapenems is strongly associated with the use of these drugs, because of their large spectrum and strong impact on the host flora. Consequently, the correct use of these drugs is an important public health objective. In France, the CA-SFM (Committee on Antimicrobial of the French Society for Microbiology) has suggested alternative strategies with narrow spectrum beta-lactam for the treatment of ESBL-PE infections, including 3rd or 4th cephalosporins, cefoxitin and penicillins with beta-lactamase inhibitors. A recent analysis including 6 prospective cohort studies of bloodstream infections due to ESBL-producing Escherichia coli did not find an excess of mortality or a longer length of hospital stay for patients receiving penicillin with beta-lactamase inhibitors, as compared to patients treated with carbapenems, after adjusting by confounding factors. As patients receiving carbapenems seem to be more severely affected, the efficacy and safety of the alternative strategy remain unproved. A randomized study is therefore needed to evaluate a deescalating therapeutic strategy (switch the carbapenem to another beta-lactam for which the isolated pathogen is susceptible) in patients with well-defined ESBL-PE infections (usual sites of infections and non severe infections). The objectives of the present study are to demonstrate that the alternative strategy of deescalating therapy is not inferior to a strategy maintaining the carbapenem in terms of clinical cure, survival, lack of relapse and microbiological cure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
6

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Hospitalization in conventional ward; (3) Receiving a curative treatment with a carbapenem for at least 24 hours and less than 3 days for a recent infection due to an ESBL-PE, either initially or secondary documented
  • With a site of infection originating from the urinary, digestive or biliary tract
  • Identification of an ESBL-PE for which susceptibility results (by the method of discs) have shown to be susceptible to more narrow spectrum beta-lactams (cephalosporins, b-lactamase inhibitors, monobactams)
  • With sepsis signs and symptoms controlled after initiation of antibiotic therapy
  • For a community-acquired or hospital-acquired infection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Neutropenia (PNN < 500/mm3)
  • Hospitalization in intensive care unit or bone marrow transplant unit
  • Documented polymicrobial infection
  • Culture of an ESBL-PE susceptible to an orally active drug (such as fluoroquinolones, cotrimoxazole) and possible use of one of these drugs
  • Need to treat a EBLSE infection(s) wtih more than drug other than carbapenems
  • Need to maintain an association with an aminoglycoside
  • Colonization without signs and symptoms of sepsis
  • Sepsis signs and symptoms not controlled at the time of enrolment
  • Known allergy to beta-lactams
  • Failure to complete medical examination
  • Absence of signed written consent.
  • Patient without healthcare insurance (French social security, CMU or AME)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Maintaining carbapenem therapy
Intravenous therapy, Maintaining carbapenem therapy
Drug: Maintaining carbapenem therapy
Intravenous therapy, Maintaining carbapenem therapy
Active Comparator: Deescalation therapy
Switch for a narrow spectrum beta-lactam active on the causative ESBL-PE. Deescalation therapy
Drug: Deescalation therapy
Intravenous therapy Switch for a narrow spectrum beta-lactam active on the causative ESBL-PE.
Other Names:
  • Switch for a narrow spectrum beta-lactam active

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical response
Time Frame: 7 days after the end of therapy
The main outcome will be the favorable response defined by criteria adapted to site of infection including clinical cure with resolution of sepsis, survival, microbiological eradication either documented or suspected, and the absence of a new antibiotic course for the treatment of the same ESBL-PE) at day 7 after the end of therapy.
7 days after the end of therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vital status of patients
Time Frame: 60 days after the initiation of therapy
Vital status at day 60 after initiation therapy ; Relapse at day 60 following initiation of therapy
60 days after the initiation of therapy
absence of relapse of the infection due to the same ESBL-PE strain
Time Frame: 60 days after the initiation of therapy
Vital status at day 60 after initiation therapy ; Relapse at day 60 following initiation of therapy
60 days after the initiation of therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Phillipe LESPRIT, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P130949
  • AOM 13063 (Other Grant/Funding Number: French ministry)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings