Effect of CTAP101 Capsules on Ca/iPTH in Advanced Breast/Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Denosumab/Zoledronic Acid

September 25, 2019 updated by: OPKO Health, Inc.

Effect of CTAP101 Capsules on Serum Calcium, Plasma Intact Parathyroid Hormone and Vitamin D Metabolites in Patients With Advanced Breast or Prostate Carcinomas With Metastases to Bone and Receiving Ongoing Therapy With Denosumab or Zoledronic Acid

This is an open-label exploratory study of CTAP101 Capsules in patients with bone metastases arising from either breast or prostate cancer, who are taking anti-resorptive therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a multi-center, open-label, repeat-dose study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of CTAP101 Capsules in subjects with bone metastases who are receiving ongoing therapy with denosumab or zoledronic acid. Following screening, approximately 12 eligible subjects with breast cancer and approximately 12 eligible subjects with prostate cancer, all of whom have metastases to bone and are undergoing treatment with anti-resorptive therapies, will receive CTAP101 Capsules at an initial daily oral dose of 30 μg (1 capsule) for 4 weeks. The daily dose may be increased in 30 μg (1 capsule) increments at 4-week intervals to a maximum of 300 μg or until serum calcium reaches >10.3 mg/dL for two consecutive visits (dose escalation phase) at which time the subject will suspend dosing until serum calcium is ≤10.0 mg/dL and will directly enter a 12-week maintenance phase, resuming treatment at a reduced daily dose, followed by a 2-week follow-up period. Subjects reaching the maximum dose without serum calcium reaching >10.3 mg/dL, will directly enter the 12-week maintenance phase, followed by a 2-week follow-up period. Serum markers for monitoring bone metabolism (including plasma iPTH, PTHrP, and serum free calcifediol), immune function and tumor burden will be measured during the treatment period. The FACT-BP Quality of Life Measurement in Patients with Bone Pain questionnaire will be used to explore the effect of the treatment, if any, on musculoskeletal pain. The genotype of vitamin D binding protein (DBP) will also be determined. Safety will be monitored through adverse events, serum and urine chemistries, hematology, and ECGs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
        • Coast Hematology-Oncology Associates
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33140
        • Mount Sinai Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • Illinois
      • Evergreen Park, Illinois, United States, 60805
        • Research by Design LLC
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
        • Inova Dwight and Martha Schar Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be diagnosed with bone metastases subsequent to breast (female subjects only) or prostate carcinoma, and will have received zoledronate or denosumab therapy for at least 3 months at the time of enrollment
  • Be at least 18 years of age
  • Have a life expectancy >12 months from the anticipated time of initiation of treatment
  • Serum calcium <9.8 mg/dL
  • Plasma iPTH ≥70 pg/mL if taking <1200 IU vitamin D
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >15 mL/min/1.73m2
  • If taking more than 1000 mg/day of elemental calcium, must be willing and able to discontinue or reduce their calcium use and/or use non-calcium based therapies for the duration of the study
  • Subjects receiving ≤2000 IU/day vitamin D (ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol) therapy must remain on a stable dose during the study. If taking more than 2000 IU/day of vitamin D (ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol), must be willing and able to reduce use to ≤2000 IU/day and remain on a stable dose for the duration of the study
  • Is willing and able to comply with study instructions and commit to all clinic visits for the duration of the study
  • Female subject of childbearing potential is neither pregnant nor lactating and must have a negative pregnancy test at the screen visit and a negative pregnancy test before dosing. All female subjects of childbearing potential and male subjects with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to use effective contraception (eg, implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, intrauterine device (IUD), sexual abstinence, vasectomy or vasectomized partner) for the duration of the study
  • Has the ability to read and understand subject Informed Consent Form (ICF).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spot urine Ca:Cr ratio >0.25 (>250 mg/g creatinine)
  • Known previous or concomitant serious illness (other than advanced cancer with metastatic bone disease) or medical condition, such as, HIV, significant gastrointestinal disease, or cardiovascular event that in the opinion of the investigator may worsen and/or interfere with participation in the study
  • History of neurological/psychiatric disorder, including psychotic disorder or dementia, or any other reason, which in the opinion of the investigator makes adherence to a treatment or follow-up schedule unlikely
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to any of the constituents of the investigational product

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CTAP101 Capsules
CTAP101 Capsules daily
Drug: CTAP101 Capsules
escalating doses
Other Names:
  • calcifediol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of repeated, escalating doses of CTAP101 on serum calcium and plasma iPTH levels
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
up to 52 weeks
Effect of repeated, escalating daily doses of CTAP101 on serum calcifediol
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
up to 52 weeks
Safety and tolerability of CTAP101
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
Measured by the number of participants with treatment related adverse events and abnormal physical examinations, vital signs, clinical laboratory tests (hematology, coagulation, and clinical chemistry, urine calcium, albumin and creatinine), and 12-lead ECG.
up to 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Effect of repeated, escalating daily doses of CTAP101 on vitamin d metabolites
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
up to 52 weeks
Effect of repeated, escalating doses of CTAP101 on serum phosphorus and spot urine calcium:creatinine ratio
Time Frame: up to 52 weeks
up to 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
OPKO Health, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 27, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 17, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 22, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 22, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 24, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CTAP101-CL-1017

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings